You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: And the Chinese Exclusion Act [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. And the Chinese Exclusion Act
When white workers building the Central Pacific Railroad began threatened to strike for higher wages in 1865, the Railroad first brought in Chinese workers, whom they treated pretty much like slaves. The Chinese proved to be cheap, fast and innovative and CPR began widescale recruitment of Chinese workers. When white workers refused to work alongside the poorly paid Chinese workers, the railroad hired only Chinese. By the end of the project, 15,000 of 17,000 railroad workers were Chinese.

The Chinese were coerced into accepting conditions worse than those given white workers and prevented from seeking recourse. Whites got $35 a month plus free board and lodging; Chinese got $26-35 without food and houses. Chinese workers did strike in 1866 for better conditions (equivalent to what the white workers were receiving). Apparently Chinese workers were whipped and stopped from looking for other work. To break the striked, the railroad company tried to get 10,000 African Americans to replace the Chinese. The attempt failed. Central Pacific RR stopped provisions to Chinese workers, starved them out. Stopped the strike.

When the railroad work ended, the Chinese were left abandoned in a racist California, without citizenship status and without wives. Leland Stanford, the head of Central Pacific Railroad, didn't care about the condition of these workers, just using them and leaving them to the whims of the California whites. (That's Stanford University to you and me.)

In the end, the US government passed the Chinese Exclusion Act.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act

"By 1860 the Chinese were the largest immigrant group in California. The Chinese workers provided cheap labor and did not use any of the government infrastructure (schools, hospitals, etc.) because the Chinese migrant population was predominantly made up of male adults. <3> As time passed and more and more Chinese migrants arrived in California violence would often break out in cities such as Los Angeles. By 1878 the congress decided to act and passed legislation excluding the Chinese, but this was vetoed by President Hayes. California, in its zeal for excluding the Chinese, declared a holiday on March 6th, 1881 in order to hold widespread demonstrations to support the anti-Chinese legislation. Once the Chinese Exclusion Act was finally passed in 1882, California went further in its discrimination against the Chinese by passing various laws that were later proved unconstitutional.<4> After the act was passed most Chinese families were faced with a dilemma: stay in the United States alone or go back to China to reunite with their families.<5> Newspapers around the country and especially in California started to discredit and blame the Chinese for most things, i.e. white unemployment. The police also discriminated against the Chinese by using the slightest opportunity to arrest them. Although there was widespread dislike for the Chinese, some capitalists and entrepreneurs resisted their exclusion based on economic factors. <6>"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC