Reply #120: your misrepresentations matter little to any students who might have been spied on, probably. nor

[Hannah Bell]

does your seeming inability to admit & correct your misrepresentation of a matter of fact.

they might, however, matter to those you falsely (based on the public record so far) accused of pedophilia/voyeurism.



i've not seen *any* of the pictures in question; the only information i have is:

1) the plantiffs say there were pictures of "partially undressed" students, including at least one of the robbins child sleeping.
2) the respondents say they were "no salacious or inappropriate" pictures.


From that information, which is the *only* public information available, I can deduce that thus far there were NO pictures of naked children.

Your individual speculations about what MIGHT be found on any further pictures in addition to the 56K already viewed aren't admissable in court.

Nor are the speculations of other DUers that there were photos of kids having sex & whacking off, or of their parents or siblings doing the same.

And so far, despite all the dire predictions of massive kid-porn spying, there's not one iota of evidence for any of it.