You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: No, not really. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, not really. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -U.S. military suffers major defeat in Korengal Valley, forced to retreat JohnyCanuck  Apr-23-10 02:57 PM   #0 
  - No, not really. nt  Captain Hilts   Apr-23-10 02:58 PM   #1 
  - We're #1! We're #1!  FiveGoodMen   Apr-23-10 02:59 PM   #2 
  - Wow, that's some pretty strong propaganda...  NaturalHigh   Apr-23-10 02:59 PM   #3 
  - Indeed, Sir: The Close Is Fascinating....  The Magistrate   Apr-23-10 03:04 PM   #5 
  - I for one think the running dogs of Capitalism will soon pay for their crimes.  bemildred   Apr-23-10 03:54 PM   #22 
     - Being, Sir, Myself, A Black-Hearted Reactionary Running-Dog Of Capitalist-Road Revisionism  The Magistrate   Apr-23-10 07:01 PM   #45 
        - Patience, brother. nt  Robb   Apr-25-10 10:42 AM   #48 
  - "What's so bad about deserters? Smirk." - xCommander AWOL (R)  SpiralHawk   Apr-25-10 10:48 AM   #51 
  - Military forces lose wars when they are forced to fight under political constraints. n/t  jody   Apr-23-10 03:04 PM   #4 
  - So.. How many "political constraints" did the Soviets have in Afghanistan?  Fumesucker   Apr-23-10 03:08 PM   #7 
  - Soviet troops were not allowed to conduct unconstrained operations as they did in WWII. n/t  jody   Apr-23-10 03:12 PM   #9 
     - Ever seen what Berlin looked like after the Soviets took it?  Fumesucker   Apr-23-10 03:17 PM   #11 
     - Your "win the Afghan hearts and mind" is a political goal, not a military one. The issue was whether  jody   Apr-23-10 03:28 PM   #14 
     - & the British Empire before them? 'Splain that, Einstein.  elehhhhna   Apr-23-10 04:03 PM   #26 
     - Please restate your question in an intelligent form. n/t  jody   Apr-23-10 04:06 PM   #29 
        - lol. no thanks.  elehhhhna   Apr-23-10 04:09 PM   #32 
     - From what I've learned, Soviet troops leveled whole towns and villages in retaliation.  Selatius   Apr-23-10 04:24 PM   #35 
        - Understand and that's why under present conditions Obama should bring our troops home. n/t  jody   Apr-23-10 04:27 PM   #36 
  - What "political constraints" are hindering our forces?  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 03:16 PM   #10 
  - Clearly, we must destroy Afghanistan in order to save it.  Fumesucker   Apr-23-10 03:21 PM   #12 
  - It is full of Afghans.  kenny blankenship   Apr-23-10 03:32 PM   #15 
  - Numerous, one example is on scene commanders require a legal opinion before they attack a suspected.  jody   Apr-23-10 03:34 PM   #16 
     - This sounds suspiciously like the Freeper argument "If we just loosened the ROE,  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 03:40 PM   #18 
        - Your assertion "Freeper argument" suggests you know nothing about war particularly recent ones like  jody   Apr-23-10 03:51 PM   #21 
           - There you go.  bemildred   Apr-23-10 03:56 PM   #23 
           - Innocent civilians benefit from "constraints". So I really don't know what you're saying.  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 03:56 PM   #24 
              - I agree" Innocent civilians benefit from 'constraints'" but troops die under political constraints.  jody   Apr-23-10 04:05 PM   #27 
                 - I asked you what you meant by "constraints", and you brought up  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 04:09 PM   #31 
                    - Yes to the question. Whether those rules save more innocent lives than it cost troop lives is open  jody   Apr-23-10 04:14 PM   #33 
                    - I wouldn't want any family member of mine to be guilty of firing upon innocent civilians.  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 04:42 PM   #37 
                       - You, as would I, avoided answering the question how many lives for your father. Yet we expect teen  jody   Apr-23-10 04:57 PM   #41 
                          - IED's are the main killer of troops there. Not firefights. So, no, I don't think  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 05:04 PM   #42 
                             - I see we disagree. I've enjoyed the exchange. Have a good day and goodbye. n/t  jody   Apr-23-10 05:07 PM   #43 
                    - And by the way, it was under BOOSH that we occupied this valley. Obama didn't order them there.  TwilightGardener   Apr-23-10 04:16 PM   #34 
                       - They remain their under President Obamas's orders  Thothmes   Apr-23-10 06:58 PM   #44 
                          - No--they don't. The whole point of the article is that they LEFT the Korengal Valley.  TwilightGardener   Apr-25-10 10:19 AM   #46 
  - Military forces lose wars for lots of reasons.  bemildred   Apr-23-10 03:50 PM   #20 
     - My post was to exonerate the grunts and blame presidents and congress for the debacle. We can  jody   Apr-23-10 03:57 PM   #25 
     - Indeed. nt  bemildred   Apr-23-10 04:06 PM   #28 
     - are you the jody ....  retired af major   Apr-25-10 10:39 AM   #47 
     - This is at the heart of Clausewitz's famous quote about war being a continuation of politics  cemaphonic   Apr-23-10 04:50 PM   #38 
        - Well, it all boils down to what "won" means.  bemildred   Apr-23-10 04:56 PM   #40 
  - This man is a deserter who fought in Iraq but deserted when ordered to deploy to Afghanistan.  DevonRex   Apr-23-10 03:06 PM   #6 
  - we should have been gone 9 yrs ago.  Mari333   Apr-23-10 03:09 PM   #8 
  - US military up to its old tricks. Put some guys out in an exposed position, dare the enemy to mount  kenny blankenship   Apr-23-10 03:25 PM   #13 
  - The Sovs could have told them how this was going to play out.  11 Bravo   Apr-23-10 03:38 PM   #17 
  - (facepalm)  BlooInBloo   Apr-23-10 03:42 PM   #19 
  - What an idiot.  Robb   Apr-23-10 04:07 PM   #30 
  - No! No! Its "strategic withdrawal". Or, some other Pentagonese rationalization.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Apr-23-10 04:53 PM   #39 
  - Promoting mutiny in the ranks of the military is a federal felony. n/t  WeDidIt   Apr-25-10 10:44 AM   #49 
  - Jesus, that is some clumsy agitprop. nt  Codeine   Apr-25-10 10:45 AM   #50 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC