You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: Not relevant (unfortunately) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Not relevant (unfortunately)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -sarah palin flew all the way to knoxville, tn. to put a 22 yr. old in prison for hacking emails spanone  Apr-23-10 12:35 PM   #0 
  - 50 years? Christ.  Teaser   Apr-23-10 12:37 PM   #1 
  - It's ridiculous  malaise   Apr-27-10 08:41 AM   #54 
  - He was wrong  proud2BlibKansan   Apr-23-10 12:38 PM   #2 
  - agreed, but her attorneys are asking for the full 50 years...the client instructs her lawyers  spanone   Apr-23-10 12:40 PM   #4 
  - ahhhh its a criminal trial...the local state attorney is in charge  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:01 PM   #10 
  - Federal, FYI. It's US attorneys for the prosecution. nt  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:12 PM   #22 
     - i stand corrected  spanone   Apr-23-10 03:38 PM   #41 
  - Do you have a link?  hack89   Apr-23-10 01:05 PM   #13 
  - my reference was an m$nbc report where they called 'palin's attorneys' grandstanders  spanone   Apr-23-10 01:09 PM   #19 
  - this is a criminal trial. She is a witness, not the plaintiff.  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:10 PM   #21 
  - I would think he'd take a few year's of probation plus a year's of house arrest  Hawkeye-X   Apr-23-10 01:37 PM   #32 
  - I hope the bimbo meant 50 seconds  Hawkeye-X   Apr-23-10 01:36 PM   #31 
  - +1.  YOY   Apr-23-10 12:45 PM   #6 
  - And the Goldman Sachs execs go Scot free.  Cleita   Apr-23-10 12:57 PM   #9 
  - Agreed.  NaturalHigh   Apr-23-10 03:42 PM   #42 
  - Did she charge the courts $100,000 for her appearance?  johnnie   Apr-23-10 12:39 PM   #3 
  - lmao... classic.  greencharlie   Apr-23-10 12:46 PM   #7 
  - Maybe he can do military service rather than jail time...  mitchum   Apr-23-10 12:42 PM   #5 
  - stupid stupid kid  sui generis   Apr-23-10 12:51 PM   #8 
  - Meanwhile, Sarah and Todd's criminal activity goes unpunished  ecstatic   Apr-23-10 01:03 PM   #11 
  - 50 years for this and that little shit bag that tried to tap a phone line gets nothing  Arctic Dave   Apr-23-10 01:04 PM   #12 
  - Hard to beleive that a deal like that was not offered. Wonder why it wasn't taken  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:09 PM   #18 
  - He hasn't been *sentenced* to 50 years  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:18 PM   #25 
  - He did something very stupid and should be held accountable under the law  bluestateguy   Apr-23-10 01:05 PM   #14 
  - I remember this, but did he really "hack" her E-mail  NeedleCast   Apr-23-10 01:05 PM   #15 
  - Its called a social engineering hack...guessing all or part of it based on knowledge of the person  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:07 PM   #17 
  - It's the unauthorized use rather than the method employed to get into it  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:16 PM   #24 
  - Technically, it wasn't hacking.  Sheltiemama   Apr-23-10 04:37 PM   #51 
  - Really have to wonder how it got this far.  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:05 PM   #16 
  - Hell hath no fury like a grifter subjected to a sting.  foxfeet   Apr-23-10 01:10 PM   #20 
  - If you can't do the time, don't do the crime  Clintonista2   Apr-23-10 01:13 PM   #23 
  - tennessee republican politics...his dad is a dem rep...1st grand jury returned no indictment  spanone   Apr-23-10 03:44 PM   #44 
     - If he doesn't get a fair trial, I'll be just as outraged as you are  Clintonista2   Apr-23-10 04:27 PM   #49 
  - On the upside...  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:19 PM   #26 
  - Not relevant (unfortunately)  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:21 PM   #28 
  - Hmm, yes and no  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 01:35 PM   #30 
     - I agree its a tactic the defense may use but I do not see it having much in the way of traction  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 01:40 PM   #34 
        - I see she mostly confined her complaints to the intrusion on her personal privacy  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 02:18 PM   #38 
           - Still wondering if a deal was offered and if so why was it not taken  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-23-10 02:26 PM   #39 
  - The webmail is insecure? Maybe it needs therapy?  Dreamer Tatum   Apr-23-10 02:13 PM   #37 
  - 50 years?  Cali_Democrat   Apr-23-10 01:20 PM   #27 
  - UP TO 50 years  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 02:10 PM   #36 
     - I know that 50 years is the total possible and not the actual.  Cali_Democrat   Apr-23-10 03:32 PM   #40 
        - Well I'm glad you feel special :-)  anigbrowl   Apr-23-10 03:50 PM   #45 
           - Okay it's not too high  Cali_Democrat   Apr-23-10 03:58 PM   #48 
  - ..and she is happy to crow about e-mails stolen from climate scientists  Viking12   Apr-23-10 01:23 PM   #29 
  - I expect that from her...  JuniperLea   Apr-23-10 01:38 PM   #33 
  - Steal an email....get 50 years...  kentuck   Apr-23-10 01:40 PM   #35 
  - Fifty years sounds about right to me.  Llewlladdwr   Apr-23-10 03:42 PM   #43 
  - Then what do you suggest for Murder? How about rape? n/t  n2doc   Apr-27-10 08:58 AM   #55 
  - I wasn't aware mail fraud statutes applied to email.  surrealAmerican   Apr-23-10 03:53 PM   #46 
  - 50 years is a bit much...should be 5 minimum......it is series shit  opihimoimoi   Apr-23-10 03:57 PM   #47 
  - I live in Knoxville.  Sheltiemama   Apr-23-10 04:32 PM   #50 
  - Meanwhile the O'Keefe Gang gets off with a slap on the wrist...  MinM   Apr-27-10 08:39 AM   #52 
  - Did she get her $100,000 speaking fee?  lame54   Apr-27-10 08:40 AM   #53 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC