You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: "We've had this discussion long enough." [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "We've had this discussion long enough."
True enough Sen. Udall, the policy stinks and it is way past time for repeal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -DADT vote could happen next month... cynatnite  Apr-21-10 08:25 PM   #0 
  - "Congressional aides said both approaches are likely to face opposition from the White House"  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 08:26 PM   #1 
  - Really?  sharp_stick   Apr-21-10 09:11 PM   #7 
     - Gee, I don't know. Why not call the White House and make sure it's not the case?  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 09:12 PM   #9 
        - Why  sharp_stick   Apr-21-10 09:13 PM   #11 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-21-10 09:15 PM   #14 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-21-10 09:16 PM   #15 
           - Maybe you should trust the sources because they've formally signed on to the repeal bill(s)  ruggerson   Apr-21-10 09:22 PM   #16 
              - It's all the media's fault.  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 09:41 PM   #18 
                 - .  Bluebear   Apr-22-10 01:13 PM   #22 
                    - .  Bluebear   Apr-22-10 03:17 PM   #23 
  - Good. If it were up to Obama I don't think DADT would ever be repealed.  katandmoon   Apr-21-10 08:27 PM   #2 
  - How is Udall "only" within 1 or 2 votes since Dems hold a 2-3 seat majority on the committee?  LonePirate   Apr-21-10 08:34 PM   #3 
  - "Congressional aides said both approaches are likely to face opposition from the White House"  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 08:50 PM   #5 
     - .  Bluebear   Apr-22-10 01:20 AM   #20 
  - Why do we have to have a taxpayer funded study ?  HillbillyBob   Apr-21-10 08:34 PM   #4 
  - Because it pushes the decision past the elections. Again.  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 09:06 PM   #6 
     - "We've had this discussion long enough."  tnlefty   Apr-21-10 09:11 PM   #8 
        - 'But the most significant factor may be how far the White House is willing to go opposing the idea"  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 09:14 PM   #12 
           - Or not n/t  sharp_stick   Apr-21-10 09:15 PM   #13 
           - I know and I wonder who might think opposing it would be  tnlefty   Apr-21-10 09:41 PM   #17 
              - The best to Mom and congrats on her recovery :))  Bluebear   Apr-21-10 10:51 PM   #19 
  - Right the fuck on! Roll it right on through.  ruggerson   Apr-21-10 09:12 PM   #10 
  - K&R  NJmaverick   Apr-22-10 06:30 AM   #21 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC