You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Yes, if "punish" means reasonable, progressive taxation based on income, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-21-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
35. Yes, if "punish" means reasonable, progressive taxation based on income,
including capital gains as income.

And while I'm at it, if there's no inheritance tax (estate tax) on the richest fraction of the top one percent, why should there be tax on the poor schmuck who's lucky enough to win a big lottery. We can't even treat the lucky poor as we do the rich who were lucky by birth. IMO, they've both won the lottery, and they should be taxed equally. Call it a luck tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC