You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #28: Sorry, the oath is not the same thing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MOD Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Sorry, the oath is not the same thing
as the contract itself. When you contract with the gov't you agree to be bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice and accept other constraints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -No more military blogs, emails must be reviewed AnnInLa  May-02-07 09:38 AM   #0 
  - Censorship. It's the American way in Bush's America.  AndyA   May-02-07 09:39 AM   #1 
  - Ok, I can maybe understand the blog thing, but personal emails? WTF?  Nickster   May-02-07 09:40 AM   #2 
  - Haven't soldiers ALWAYS been encourage to write letters to their families? Until now that is.  Blue State Native   May-02-07 09:49 AM   #10 
     - Nothing new. Military personnel in combat zones have always been censored.  TahitiNut   May-02-07 11:22 AM   #48 
  - Kick.  Heidi   May-02-07 09:41 AM   #3 
  - If we let our troops have Free Speech, pretty soon everyone would want it.  dicksteele   May-02-07 09:41 AM   #4 
  - What a shame! So now the soldiers  Justyce   May-02-07 09:42 AM   #5 
  - I'm sure all emails will not be stopped, only  AnnInLa   May-02-07 11:04 AM   #42 
  - Infuriating for the soldiers, I'm sure; is this even legal? nt  babylonsister   May-02-07 09:44 AM   #6 
  - Here's the permalink  displacedtexan   May-02-07 09:46 AM   #7 
  - The troops signed up and  MOD   May-02-07 09:47 AM   #8 
  - That isn't exactly true...but YOU know that  Horse with no Name   May-02-07 09:49 AM   #11 
  - Which part, isn't  MOD   May-02-07 09:56 AM   #12 
     - Just looking over my oath of office...  Squatch   May-02-07 10:02 AM   #13 
     - That is your oath not  MOD   May-02-07 10:06 AM   #15 
        - I am beyond my contractural obligation to the Army.  Squatch   May-02-07 10:12 AM   #19 
           - So now you admit that  MOD   May-02-07 10:15 AM   #21 
              - I admit that the truth and the BS you're spewing are two different things  Squatch   May-02-07 10:18 AM   #24 
     - "United States Military Oath of Allegiance" READ THIS. Where does it say you lose your right to FREE  in_cog_ni_to   May-02-07 10:09 AM   #17 
     - Sorry, the oath is not the same thing  MOD   May-02-07 10:25 AM   #28 
        - Are you having problems reading?  Squatch   May-02-07 10:29 AM   #30 
     - Welcome to DU - MOD  Zywiec   May-02-07 11:14 AM   #46 
  - Many of the troops signed up because they wanted to fight for our country  Horse with no Name   May-02-07 10:17 AM   #23 
  - They can't have the soldiers telling their families that they are miserable under  Horse with no Name   May-02-07 09:49 AM   #9 
  - CONTROL THE FLOW OF INFORMATION. Keep the troops in the dark and keep the public  in_cog_ni_to   May-02-07 10:06 AM   #14 
  - Can't see how this doesn't violate the first amendment  Lobster Martini   May-02-07 10:09 AM   #16 
  - Repeat after me,  MOD   May-02-07 10:13 AM   #20 
     - Man, are you completely talking from your ass, or what?  Squatch   May-02-07 10:17 AM   #22 
     - More likely he is just "concerned"  Horse with no Name   May-02-07 10:19 AM   #26 
        - More likely *another* goosestepping RW automaton  Squatch   May-02-07 10:22 AM   #27 
           - That's a good one  MOD   May-02-07 10:32 AM   #32 
              - Aha. So you really are an expert because you live *near* an AFB.  Squatch   May-02-07 10:34 AM   #33 
                 - Atleast I know the difference  MOD   May-02-07 10:40 AM   #36 
                    - Very telling, "I 'ALMOST' joined"  Horse with no Name   May-02-07 10:48 AM   #39 
                       - Ten years ago  MOD   May-02-07 10:56 AM   #40 
     - Reading Comprehension problem?  in_cog_ni_to   May-02-07 10:18 AM   #25 
     - So they get to defend the Constitution...they just don't get to have the benefits derived therefrom.  Old and In the Way   May-02-07 10:30 AM   #31 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   May-02-07 11:06 AM   #44 
     - the Constitution still fucking applies  alarimer   May-02-07 11:17 AM   #47 
  - Well, unfortunately, this shows the military what they are fighting for.  Frustratedlady   May-02-07 10:10 AM   #18 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   May-02-07 10:25 AM   #29 
  - Soon they will need political officers attached to each company.  Old and In the Way   May-02-07 10:35 AM   #34 
  - They already have them  htuttle   May-02-07 10:48 AM   #38 
  - Now, to the point....  frogcycle   May-02-07 10:37 AM   #35 
  - We say the same thing but  MOD   May-02-07 10:45 AM   #37 
  - This will hit the RW harder than progressives  AnnInLa   May-02-07 11:00 AM   #41 
  - So Congress must have used these blogs and emails as support for pulling the troops out  Nikki Stone1   May-02-07 11:05 AM   #43 
  - Haven't soldiers in war usually had their correspondence screened?  kineta   May-02-07 11:13 AM   #45 
  - Of course military mailed has always been censored.  Zywiec   May-02-07 11:27 AM   #49 
  - Yes, they/we have.  TahitiNut   May-02-07 11:27 AM   #50 
  - Update: Interview with the bozo in the mil who wrote this new regulation  AnnInLa   May-02-07 12:02 PM   #51 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC