You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: different times [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
shedevil69taz Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. different times
I didn't live in them, I don't know the answer to that.

I think what you are getting at though is that women and people with dark skin had no choice in being what they are, and equating homosexual behavior as something one doesn't choose to be.

I don't ever get involved in that debate, as its usually what causes the most division and yes hatred on both sides. Some people's religous convictions tell them that its wrong, and that it is infact a choise, and they shouldn't support people or organizations that condone homosexual behavior. Whether or not they are right or wrong I don't know. I do know that thier religeous beliefs do not make thier service any less honorable, and if we give them the chance to get out when we repeal DADT I would not think less of them if they choose to take it.

All I am saying is that we should decide beforehand under what conditions we allow those people to leave the service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -DOD reportedly examining IF, rather than how, to repeal DADT FreeState  Mar-23-10 05:39 PM   #0 
  - Quelle surprise.  foxfeet   Mar-23-10 05:49 PM   #1 
  - LOL - well it seems like the more we push the more they ignore  FreeState   Mar-23-10 05:56 PM   #2 
  - Nothing surprises me anymore when people are handed s**t and see ice cream...n/t  joeybee12   Mar-23-10 05:59 PM   #3 
  - Do we know who is on the review panel?  Starry Messenger   Mar-23-10 06:03 PM   #4 
  - The article doesn't match the headline  Renew Deal   Mar-23-10 06:09 PM   #5 
  - Really?  FreeState   Mar-23-10 06:15 PM   #8 
     - This is the part that should be bolded  Renew Deal   Mar-23-10 06:20 PM   #9 
        - So you skipped over the word "reportedly" in the OP title? n/t  FreeState   Mar-23-10 06:30 PM   #10 
        - dupe n/t  FreeState   Mar-23-10 06:30 PM   #11 
  - the President has spoken.  spanone   Mar-23-10 06:11 PM   #6 
  - You just change the law. Just like other militaries have done...  Hissyspit   Mar-23-10 06:15 PM   #7 
  - perspective of a noncommissioned officer  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 07:07 PM   #12 
  - You realize its been examined over and over already right?  FreeState   Mar-23-10 07:54 PM   #13 
  - broken link  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 09:38 PM   #14 
     - Bluntly, this is just like serving with black people.  riderinthestorm   Mar-23-10 10:20 PM   #16 
        - different times  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 11:18 PM   #21 
           - No difference. And being gay isn't a choice. That IS what is right  riderinthestorm   Mar-23-10 11:39 PM   #23 
              - I think  shedevil69taz   Mar-24-10 12:26 AM   #26 
  - The way to "mitigate any negative feelings of those opposed to it" is to PUT THEM THE FUCK OUT  cherokeeprogressive   Mar-23-10 10:23 PM   #17 
     - the responsibilities at hand  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 10:46 PM   #18 
     - UCMJ Article 134 n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Mar-23-10 11:02 PM   #19 
     - I'm sure other present and former military can correct me,  riderinthestorm   Mar-23-10 11:02 PM   #20 
        - I would hope  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 11:37 PM   #22 
           - You are already serving with gay service members.  riderinthestorm   Mar-23-10 11:41 PM   #24 
              - I know there are  shedevil69taz   Mar-23-10 11:51 PM   #25 
                 - I truly thank you for your service but anyone who objects to serving with gays is a bigot  riderinthestorm   Mar-24-10 10:14 AM   #27 
     - Don't forget about the Law of Unintended Consequences...  MicaelS   Mar-24-10 10:28 AM   #28 
        - I've already served, so your question about whether or not I'd be willing to be drafted is a  cherokeeprogressive   Mar-24-10 12:02 PM   #29 
           - In the Army...  MicaelS   Mar-24-10 12:40 PM   #30 
  - In some areas of high enlistment, this could be a problem... at first, anyway.  MissMarple   Mar-23-10 10:15 PM   #15 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC