You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: Sanders & Wyden put it in the Senate bill: "SEC. 1332. WAIVER FOR STATE INNOVATION" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. Sanders & Wyden put it in the Senate bill: "SEC. 1332. WAIVER FOR STATE INNOVATION"
As another DU'er pointed out, too, there are also improvements in the Senate version -- for one, Kucinich's bill provided for States to merely seek federal funding, where the Sanders-Wyden language instructs that federal funding actually be provided.

(I couldn't find anything in the reconciliation version that changes this, so the language must be remaining as is -starts on Page 212 of the Senate bill):


SEC. 1332. WAIVER FOR STATE INNOVATION.
(a) APPLICATION.—
(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may apply to the Secretary for the waiver of all or any requirements described in paragraph (2) with respect to health insurance coverage within that State for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2017. Such application shall—
(A) be filed at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may require;
(B) contain such information as the Secretary may require, including—
(i) a comprehensive description of the State legislation and program to implement a plan meeting the requirements for a waiver under this section; and
(ii) a 10-year budget plan for such plan that is budget neutral for the Federal
Government; and
(C) provide an assurance that the State has enacted the law described in subsection (b)(2).
(2) REQUIREMENTS.—The requirements described in this paragraph with respect to health insurance coverage within the State for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, are as follows:
(A) Part I of subtitle D.
(B) Part II of subtitle D.
(C) Section 1402.
(D) Sections 36B, 4980H, and 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(3) PASS THROUGH OF FUNDING.—With respect to a State waiver under paragraph (1), under which, due to the structure of the State plan, individuals and small employers in the State would not qualify for the premium tax credits, cost-sharing reductions, or small business credits under sections 36B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or under part I of subtitle E for which they would otherwise be eligible, the Secretary shall provide for an alternative means by which the aggregate amount of such credits or reductions that would have been paid on behalf of participants in the Exchanges established under this title had the State not received such waiver, shall be paid to the State for purposes of implementing the State plan under the waiver. Such amount shall be determined annually by the Secretary, taking into consideration the experience of other States with respect to participation in an Exchange and credits and reductions provided under such provisions to residents of the other States.
(4) WAIVER CONSIDERATION AND TRANSPARENCY.—
(A) IN GENERAL.—An application for a waiver under this section shall be considered by the Secretary in accordance with the regulations described in subparagraph (B).
(B) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall promulgate regulations relating to waivers under this section that provide—
(i) a process for public notice and comment at the State level, including public hearings, sufficient to ensure a meaningful level of public input;
(ii) a process for the submission of an application that ensures the disclosure of—
(I) the provisions of law that the State involved seeks to waive; and
(II) the specific plans of the State to ensure that the waiver will be in compliance with subsection (b);
(iii) a process for providing public notice and comment after the application is received by the Secretary, that is sufficient to ensure a meaningful level of public input and that does not impose requirements that are in addition to, or duplicative of, requirements imposed under the Administrative Procedures Act, or requirements that are unreasonable or unnecessarily burdensome with respect to State compliance;
(iv) a process for the submission to the Secretary of periodic reports by the State concerning the implementation of the program under the waiver; and
(v) a process for the periodic evaluation by the Secretary of the program under the waiver.
(C) REPORT.—The Secretary shall annually report to Congress concerning actions taken by the Secretary with respect to applications for waivers under this section.
(5) COORDINATED WAIVER PROCESS.—The Secretary shall develop a process for coordinating and consolidating the State waiver processes applicable under the provisions of this section, and the existing waiver processes applicable under titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act, and any other Federal law relating to the provision of health care items or services. Such process shall permit a State to submit a single application for a waiver under any or all of such provisions.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama blocks single-payer at the state level defendandprotect  Mar-20-10 09:40 PM   #0 
  - So much for "Change".  Odin2005   Mar-20-10 09:41 PM   #1 
  - I still have change  DJ13   Mar-20-10 09:42 PM   #2 
  - Chains you can believe in.  Political Heretic   Mar-20-10 09:43 PM   #3 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-20-10 09:45 PM   #6 
  - nice  d_b   Mar-20-10 10:14 PM   #22 
  - There ya go....  readmoreoften   Mar-20-10 10:41 PM   #34 
  - Vile  kenny blankenship   Mar-20-10 09:44 PM   #4 
  - Where is this quote....cause I couldn't find it at the link......  FrenchieCat   Mar-20-10 09:44 PM   #5 
  - "Kucinich Amendment Dropped From Health Care Bill" . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:02 PM   #14 
  - What a Letdown. n/t  OhioChick   Mar-20-10 09:46 PM   #7 
  - Do you have a source? Your link is from blog entries from 2009.  NYC_SKP   Mar-20-10 09:50 PM   #8 
  - This thread can be studied for the difference between the  FrenchieCat   Mar-20-10 09:51 PM   #9 
  - "Pelosi Bill Strips Right of States to Adopt Single Payer" . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:04 PM   #15 
     - thank you for that n/t  upi402   Mar-21-10 01:16 AM   #48 
  - That doesn't even sound possible. I think more information is needed  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 09:53 PM   #10 
  - His amendment was removed back in November by the committee  tammywammy   Mar-20-10 09:55 PM   #11 
  - Multiple sources would be a good idea at this point, with no disrespect intended  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:01 PM   #12 
  - Huffington Post/Washington Independent . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:08 PM   #16 
     - Thank you for those links.  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:12 PM   #17 
        - How about Florida 2000? Are you kidding?  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:13 PM   #19 
           - Well, that's a good point. I was thinking it was more like trying to block  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:15 PM   #24 
              - Homosexual marriage would be the same thing -- DOMA . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:31 PM   #30 
  - No. It was not removed by the committee.  bvar22   Mar-20-10 11:01 PM   #40 
     - Thanks for the correction. n/t  tammywammy   Mar-20-10 11:18 PM   #41 
     - So he caved AND lost his amendment?  aquart   Mar-21-10 12:04 AM   #44 
     - Dennis hasn't "caved" nearly as many times as Obama over the last year.  bvar22   Mar-21-10 10:26 PM   #84 
     - have you noticed the pattern too?  Donnachaidh   Mar-21-10 07:59 PM   #69 
     - Thank you!! Kucinich also made clear in the Goodman interview ...  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:09 PM   #70 
  - More info --  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:12 PM   #18 
     - I totally missed this wrinkle, too. n/t  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:13 PM   #21 
     - So in otherwords, you don't have any real sources that back up  FrenchieCat   Mar-20-10 10:15 PM   #23 
        - Huffington Post and Kucinich, himself, are not "sources" . . .????  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:24 PM   #27 
        - Did you read the thread? The poster is catching up with this bit of things.  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:34 PM   #32 
  - Pelosi said today she won't allow a seperate vote, "not on single payer, not on anything"  Better Believe It   Mar-20-10 10:02 PM   #13 
  - ERISA would not necessarily block the PA plan, according to some.  drm604   Mar-20-10 10:13 PM   #20 
  - As it was put ... "bill provides no safeguards to protect states from lawsuits ...  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:28 PM   #28 
     - It provides no protection from lawsuits but...  drm604   Mar-20-10 10:53 PM   #37 
        - As I said I was totally unaware of this whole issue . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 11:30 PM   #43 
  - Bullshit  Zomby Woof   Mar-20-10 10:16 PM   #25 
  - With respect, Gavin is not known for his legislative acumen.  EFerrari   Mar-20-10 10:50 PM   #36 
  - Gavin conveniently leaves out  Luminous Animal   Mar-21-10 02:26 PM   #65 
     - SF was sued under ERISA and "costly legal fight for the city." --  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:19 PM   #71 
  - Obama: "I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care program."  Karmadillo   Mar-20-10 10:17 PM   #26 
  - What was it Pelosi said: "He was in favor of a lot of things during the campaign . ..  defendandprotect   Mar-20-10 10:30 PM   #29 
     - You're right. I looked up the link. I guess the ends justify the lies.  Karmadillo   Mar-21-10 10:59 AM   #55 
        - Thank you . . . and it just struck me that Pelosi is working directly against CA citizens' interests  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:24 PM   #73 
           - They don't sleep. They have to keep swimming or they drown.  Karmadillo   Mar-21-10 08:54 PM   #78 
  - "Nancy Pelosi acting on Obama's instructions has stripped the Kucinich amendment from HR 3200"  Cali_Democrat   Mar-20-10 10:33 PM   #31 
  - See here . . . "stripped from the bill by Nancy Pelosi behind closed doors"--  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 09:13 PM   #81 
  - see! they told us Kucinich never accomplishes anything!  G_j   Mar-20-10 10:35 PM   #33 
  - what a load of pig crap!  Aramchek   Mar-20-10 10:47 PM   #35 
  - LINKS from 2009? WTF.... huh?.... and....unbelievable....14 RECS??? Do You People Even READ???  NYC_SKP   Mar-20-10 11:00 PM   #38 
  - This is DU  tammywammy   Mar-20-10 11:01 PM   #39 
  - Sanders & Wyden put it in the Senate bill: "SEC. 1332. WAIVER FOR STATE INNOVATION"  quiet.american   Mar-20-10 11:28 PM   #42 
  - Well, in the Goodman interview with Kucinich . ..  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:30 PM   #75 
  - Why are you posting something from LAST YEAR?  WeekendWarrior   Mar-21-10 12:08 AM   #45 
  - past pull dated? n/t  upi402   Mar-21-10 12:12 AM   #46 
  - Irrelevent. HR3200 is dead. Let's talk about the current bill. nt  johnaries   Mar-21-10 12:16 AM   #47 
  - Single payer is "irrelevant"?  Lorien   Mar-21-10 01:56 AM   #51 
  - I think they have the bill they want.  laughingliberal   Mar-21-10 08:29 PM   #74 
  - We are talking about the "current bill" -- and a safeguard for states that want single payer . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:38 PM   #76 
  - From what I've been reading the waiver date of 2017 on Sec.1332 is more the problem  suffragette   Mar-21-10 01:41 AM   #49 
  - It does seem like the 2017 date is the real problem.  drm604   Mar-21-10 09:25 AM   #53 
  - The best way would probably be to have clearcut language  suffragette   Mar-21-10 11:57 AM   #56 
  - I agree wholeheartedly that it would be much better to have language  drm604   Mar-21-10 12:14 PM   #57 
     - We're both looking for the silver lining  suffragette   Mar-21-10 12:47 PM   #60 
        - Maybe The Keystone State can be the keystone for single payer.  drm604   Mar-21-10 01:08 PM   #61 
           - Symbolic and appropriate  suffragette   Mar-21-10 01:29 PM   #62 
              - My Uncle and cousins and their families are in the Spokane area  drm604   Mar-21-10 02:05 PM   #63 
                 - Spokane is on the other side of the Cascade mountains  suffragette   Mar-21-10 02:19 PM   #64 
                    - I got to live in Vancouver for five weeks for work back in '96.  drm604   Mar-21-10 02:27 PM   #66 
                       - Lucky you  suffragette   Mar-21-10 03:56 PM   #67 
  - Guess by 2017, the insurance companies would feel better about competition . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 09:16 PM   #82 
  - Even more confusing . .. meanwhile, insurance companies have used ERISA for harassment  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 08:48 PM   #77 
     - I hope PNHP as it right and we can push past ERISA  suffragette   Mar-21-10 10:36 PM   #85 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-21-10 01:53 AM   #50 
  - WTF?!  earth mom   Mar-21-10 04:33 AM   #52 
  - Yes  Trillo   Mar-21-10 10:36 AM   #54 
  - President Obama and Speaker Pelosi made  ProSense   Mar-21-10 12:17 PM   #58 
  - Reread what you've posted . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 09:00 PM   #79 
  - K & R  SlingBlade   Mar-21-10 12:44 PM   #59 
  - K and WTF.  NYC_SKP   Mar-21-10 05:02 PM   #68 
  - what, our state wants SIngle Payer?  tigereye   Mar-21-10 08:22 PM   #72 
  - I think a lot of states would go in that direction, it's what citizens wants . . .  defendandprotect   Mar-21-10 09:05 PM   #80 
     - wow, thanks for the info!  tigereye   Mar-21-10 10:50 PM   #86 
  - Is that true?  Tomorrows Dream   Mar-21-10 09:26 PM   #83 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC