rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-17-10 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 52. You apparently have a problem with the OP. Just wondering how you stood on the issue, nm |
| -Fool me infinitely, shame on... whom? |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 09:47 PM |
#0 |
 -
And don't ya just love this bullshit about there are not enough votes for a Public Option? |
LakeSamish706 |
Mar-16-10 09:52 PM |
#1 |
  -
And it's a triple sell-out |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:04 PM |
#5 |
| -
I was a big dummy. |
hulka38 |
Mar-16-10 09:53 PM |
#2 |
| -
"First, progressives got suckered..." |
ProSense |
Mar-16-10 09:58 PM |
#3 |
| -
No one that hasn't been insulted already |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:07 PM |
#6 |
| -
Yeah, fools. n/t |
ProSense |
Mar-16-10 10:09 PM |
#8 |
| -
Is this the part where you stop all sense of pretense and laugh at the face of liberals |
liberation |
Mar-17-10 04:45 PM |
#42 |
| -
Oh look, |
ProSense |
Mar-17-10 11:30 PM |
#75 |
| -
Always ready to throw gasolene on the fire. Why do you have such hatred for |
rhett o rick |
Mar-17-10 05:00 PM |
#47 |
| -
I'm fooled no more by the administration or party. |
mmonk |
Mar-16-10 09:58 PM |
#4 |
| -
I hear more and more people saying that. |
dixiegrrrrl |
Mar-16-10 10:08 PM |
#7 |
| -
Why do you think the SCOTUS had to rule that way on corporate $$$? |
Greyhound |
Mar-17-10 03:44 PM |
#37 |
| -
They need to be reminded of Lincoln's quote: |
Individualist |
Mar-16-10 10:10 PM |
#9 |
| -
Probably should be updated |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:12 PM |
#10 |
| -
As per the sciences of behavioral and statistical psychology |
tom_paine |
Mar-16-10 11:13 PM |
#22 |
| -
I'm still looking for the enlightment at either end of the tunnel |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 11:25 PM |
#23 |
| -
I agree with no money and no straight ticket voting |
dflprincess |
Mar-17-10 04:23 PM |
#40 |
| -
so we've got a president that cuts deals behind our backs |
Enrique |
Mar-16-10 10:17 PM |
#11 |
| -
Sad but true |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:21 PM |
#12 |
| -
Right ... promised there would not be any government run health care plan . .. |
defendandprotect |
Mar-16-10 10:22 PM |
#13 |
| -
I just think he came of age during Reaganomics and fundamentally believes it |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:28 PM |
#16 |
| -
Then he is either very intellectually dishonest , or too chickenshit to register Republican |
liberation |
Mar-17-10 04:51 PM |
#43 |
| -
If Obama and Rahm are of one mind . . . we're in a lot of trouble . . . |
defendandprotect |
Mar-17-10 07:46 PM |
#59 |
| -
Do you think that excuses everything that he does? |
gleaner |
Mar-17-10 11:26 PM |
#74 |
| -
And yet there are still large numbers of "true believers" against all verifiable data, they |
ShortnFiery |
Mar-16-10 10:25 PM |
#14 |
| -
"There's one born every minute." |
Forkboy |
Mar-16-10 10:26 PM |
#15 |
| -
And today we have threads |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 10:29 AM |
#36 |
| -
Sometimes reading DU feels like a bad Orwellian dream... |
liberation |
Mar-17-10 04:57 PM |
#46 |
| -
Well, a lot of that is what I consider |
defendandprotect |
Mar-17-10 07:48 PM |
#60 |
| -
Alas... |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:37 PM |
#17 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-16-10 11:38 PM |
#25 |
| -
IMHO, the "DLC" thing is a distraction |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 07:20 AM |
#33 |
| -
The politicians yes, but I think that most party members are still traditional Dems. |
Lorien |
Mar-17-10 09:23 PM |
#63 |
| -
DK, Grayson, and Weiner all played footsie with the... |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 09:55 PM |
#68 |
| -
Holy cow! I recced this and the count went up by 3. |
Jim Sagle |
Mar-16-10 10:40 PM |
#18 |
| -
They can use a voter like you in Chicago! n/t |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 10:53 PM |
#20 |
| -
I am soooooo fuckin' disgusted with this president and the so-called Dems. |
kath |
Mar-16-10 10:46 PM |
#19 |
| -
It's amazing what can be accomplished under the banner of |
lwcon |
Mar-16-10 11:07 PM |
#21 |
| -
How much "lesser" are they at this point? nt |
Lorien |
Mar-16-10 11:39 PM |
#26 |
| -
Indeed |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 05:37 AM |
#29 |
| -
And now he's promising not to back Progressives who vote against his wealthcare bill |
Lorien |
Mar-16-10 11:37 PM |
#24 |
| -
More accurately he said no help to ANYONE that votes no. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 12:15 AM |
#28 |
| -
His help did wonders for Martha Coakley! |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 06:14 AM |
#31 |
| -
On another thread... |
Javaman |
Mar-17-10 04:04 PM |
#38 |
| -
That's not why she lost. She ran a godawful campaign. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 04:51 PM |
#44 |
| -
How is the strategy of shitting on the base working out for the Dems? |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 09:45 PM |
#65 |
| -
That's the attitude of a self-perpetuating defeatist. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 10:06 PM |
#69 |
| -
Try "realist" |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 10:49 PM |
#71 |
| -
Here's what I see. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 11:04 PM |
#72 |
| -
It would be a war... |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 11:08 PM |
#73 |
| -
That's not exactly true. Ezra Klein talked about this last week. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 12:09 AM |
#27 |
| -
Do you have additional beliefs that wash away... |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 05:51 AM |
#30 |
| -
And, of course, this line of reasoning magically evaporated, as well |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 07:27 AM |
#34 |
| -
The NYT was an embarrassingly badly sourced article. |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 04:53 PM |
#45 |
| -
In other words, you only accept hearsay as long as it fits your narrative... |
liberation |
Mar-17-10 05:07 PM |
#50 |
| -
I'm not the one going off on the subject of crappy reporting. nt |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 09:22 PM |
#62 |
| -
Funny, I could swear the whole premise of your post was how the NYT was a bad journalistic source |
liberation |
Mar-17-10 09:48 PM |
#66 |
| -
I refer you to |
Lord Helmet |
Mar-17-10 10:24 PM |
#70 |
| -
K & R nt |
LWolf |
Mar-17-10 07:10 AM |
#32 |
| -
thx! n/t |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 10:01 AM |
#35 |
| -
Democrats win Democracy loses. Fuck all Parties not for the People. |
pundaint |
Mar-17-10 04:04 PM |
#39 |
| -
If you read the actual article---novel idea for some, I understand---the language you highlight |
Atticus |
Mar-17-10 04:44 PM |
#41 |
| -
So where does the buck stop when we dont get single payer and we dont get a PO? nm |
rhett o rick |
Mar-17-10 05:03 PM |
#48 |
| -
And, your post has WHAT to do with mine? nt |
Atticus |
Mar-17-10 05:24 PM |
#51 |
| -
You apparently have a problem with the OP. Just wondering how you stood on the issue, nm |
rhett o rick |
Mar-17-10 05:30 PM |
#52 |
| -
My problem with the OP is simply what I stated: it is a selective quote of something said by |
Atticus |
Mar-17-10 07:14 PM |
#55 |
| -
I understand. Sorry, I got one hell of a chip on my shoulder. nm |
rhett o rick |
Mar-17-10 07:19 PM |
#56 |
| -
Thanks. No problem. These are aggravating times. nt |
Atticus |
Mar-17-10 07:28 PM |
#57 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-17-10 05:05 PM |
#49 |
| -
It's Over Johnny |
merkins |
Mar-17-10 06:31 PM |
#53 |
| -
I like your idea of "Progressive Underground". Anyone can call themselves |
rhett o rick |
Mar-17-10 07:38 PM |
#58 |
| -
Progressive Underground -- count me in |
troubledamerican |
Mar-17-10 08:54 PM |
#61 |
| -
If this bill is so great, why don't House Dems want to openly vote for it? |
SandWalker1984 |
Mar-17-10 06:54 PM |
#54 |
| -
Isn't that just perfect? |
lwcon |
Mar-17-10 09:43 PM |
#64 |
| -
I think duplicity is the word you were searching for. kr nt |
ooglymoogly |
Mar-17-10 09:49 PM |
#67 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread