You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: Deleted message [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
  -Central Figure in CDC Vaccine Cover-Up Absconds With $2M babsbunny  Mar-15-10 07:57 PM   #0 
  - Thanks for posting this but I'm not surprised and suspected something like this was going on.  earth mom   Mar-15-10 08:10 PM   #1 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-10 09:53 PM   #11 
  - Very interesting stuff  Sugarcoated   Mar-15-10 11:21 PM   #14 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-10 08:12 PM   #2 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-15-10 09:49 PM   #8 
     - DUPE  Odin2005   Mar-15-10 09:50 PM   #9 
  - Here come the unreccers. Thanks for posting, RFKjr is always worth reading. K & R nt  glitch   Mar-15-10 08:47 PM   #3 
  - Just great.  Archae   Mar-15-10 08:57 PM   #4 
  - I don't think the guy disappearing proves a cover up.  Chal   Mar-15-10 09:04 PM   #5 
  - Exactly.  Archae   Mar-15-10 09:19 PM   #6 
  - I didn't know you were responding to post #1,  Chal   Mar-15-10 09:33 PM   #7 
  - Don't even bother. These vaccines=autism  liberalhistorian   Mar-17-10 02:15 PM   #39 
  - McCarthy's son isn't even autistic.  Odin2005   Mar-15-10 09:52 PM   #10 
  - Vaccinations prior to 1989 are irrelevant in regard to this subject.  Silver Gaia   Mar-16-10 04:23 AM   #18 
  - +1000  happy_liberal   Mar-16-10 12:27 PM   #22 
  - "There IS legitimate reason for concern."  HiFructosePronSyrup   Mar-16-10 01:03 PM   #24 
  - It's as bad as the "refrigerator mom" theory  liberalhistorian   Mar-17-10 02:16 PM   #40 
  - Really? Which leading scientists?  SemiCharmedQuark   Mar-16-10 08:58 PM   #28 
  - Not everyone who smokes gets lung cancer, either. DUH.  WinkyDink   Mar-17-10 02:23 PM   #41 
  - yep.  laundry_queen   Mar-17-10 02:33 PM   #43 
  - Exactly  Sugarcoated   Mar-18-10 02:37 PM   #53 
  - I don't think  laundry_queen   Mar-17-10 02:30 PM   #42 
  - Politics . . . money  Sugarcoated   Mar-15-10 10:36 PM   #12 
  - How do we know he's "disappeared?" He's not responding to reporters' calls & emails.  Garbo 2004   Mar-15-10 10:47 PM   #13 
  - I think this is important for people to see  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 12:44 AM   #15 
  - urgh  omega minimo   Mar-16-10 01:14 AM   #16 
  - The Government LIED?  Why Syzygy   Mar-16-10 02:09 AM   #17 
  - And some people wonder why authority is questioned.  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 08:55 PM   #26 
     - I wonder why it is not questioned;  Why Syzygy   Mar-18-10 01:39 AM   #47 
  - This is very significant  autorank   Mar-16-10 04:49 AM   #19 
  - Kick  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 12:10 PM   #20 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-16-10 12:12 PM   #21 
  - LOL  HiFructosePronSyrup   Mar-16-10 12:37 PM   #23 
  - LOL  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 02:34 PM   #25 
  - LOL. Leave it to HuffPo to jump on the anti vax bandwagon. Doesn't change Wakefield being exposed  SemiCharmedQuark   Mar-16-10 08:57 PM   #27 
  - Some maybe  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 09:02 PM   #30 
     - "Some just want to get to the truth."  HiFructosePronSyrup   Mar-16-10 11:45 PM   #33 
     - I see your point.  Sugarcoated   Mar-17-10 02:00 PM   #36 
        - It's been proven that there is no connectino.  HiFructosePronSyrup   Mar-17-10 02:34 PM   #45 
     - I'm just going to ditto your post. eom  laundry_queen   Mar-17-10 02:34 PM   #44 
  - Meh...  SidDithers   Mar-16-10 09:00 PM   #29 
  - I do believe it's too late to unrec.  Sugarcoated   Mar-16-10 09:03 PM   #31 
     - Unrecc'd in spirit, if not actual fact...nt  SidDithers   Mar-17-10 12:16 AM   #35 
        - Did you just use the word spirit?  Sugarcoated   Mar-17-10 02:03 PM   #37 
  - Kick!  earth mom   Mar-16-10 11:43 PM   #32 
  - And this changes the overwhelming majority of the research  nemo137   Mar-16-10 11:50 PM   #34 
  - Once again, RFK, Jr, drops a steaming turd of ignorance  semillama   Mar-17-10 02:07 PM   #38 
     - In this whole thread, yours is the post I would recommend  Orrex   Mar-17-10 06:36 PM   #46 
     - Looks like he forged docs, held simultaneous full time positions  upi402   Mar-18-10 02:03 AM   #48 
     - And even if true, this addresses any of the science how, exactly? n/t  semillama   Mar-18-10 09:49 AM   #50 
        - Well, I'm just thinking of the word "yet"  upi402   Mar-18-10 02:12 PM   #52 
     - +1000  amborin   Mar-18-10 02:15 AM   #49 
     - Exactly, thank you!  liberalhistorian   Mar-18-10 10:35 AM   #51 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC