You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: No Bigtree, that is simply untrue [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. No Bigtree, that is simply untrue
We largely left them alone, both through the Clinton and early parts of the Bush administration, doing little more than expressing out disapproval and hoping they would ease up a bit. The last war before 2000 that the US was involved in was in Bosnia, where we were defending the Muslim population against Serbian genocide.

We did not provoke the Taliban in any significant way, nor did we force them to support bin Laden's quasi-military ambitions, nor did we force bin Laden himself to organize attacks on September 11 that killed over 3,000 people (I do not subscribe to LIHOP or MIHOP conspiracy theories). No country in the world with the military capability to respond would accept such an attack on its territory. That is not opportunistic militarism, it is simple self-defense. To believe that any country would let such an incident go by without responding is delusional.

No, you can argue all day about the degree to which our strategy in Afghanistan has been productive or not (and I'd agree that the answer is 'not' to a large degree, though not completely). but there is simply no disputing the fact that the Taliban were operating a violent oppressive regime of their own free will before we entered into any direct conflict with them. And yes, it is appropriate to compare them iwht the Nazis or any other tyrranical government through history. Their misdeeds took place on a smaller scale, but were both systematic and directed at the entire population under their control.

I can understand things like the Taliban's hunting down and killing of communists. I don't like it, but the USSR killed a lot of Afghans during and following their invasion of that country, up to 2 million by some accounts. It's understandable hat a new government would want to get rid of anyone who had supported the soviet occupation. What is not understandable is going on to crush your own population with religious extremism that didn't even have the bad excuse of being an indigenous tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -In 30 days, 150+ civilians killed in Af-Pak conflict Robb  Mar-15-10 10:00 AM   #0 
  - Robb, considering the opposition to HCR it's clear there are many  NJmaverick   Mar-15-10 10:07 AM   #1 
  - "Lives are just political pawns to them."  Forkboy   Mar-15-10 11:36 AM   #8 
  - boy, we sure 'saved a lot of lives' in Afghanistan this month  bigtree   Mar-15-10 11:42 AM   #9 
     - Do you appreciate how many lives would be lost if the Taliban were to take control?  NJmaverick   Mar-15-10 11:50 AM   #10 
     - And if Spartacus had a Piper Cub . . .  bigtree   Mar-15-10 12:01 PM   #11 
        - Just like violence against the Nazis and Imperial Japan saved millions of lives  NJmaverick   Mar-15-10 12:13 PM   #14 
           - so you think the militarized Taliban resistance is just like the Nazis and Imperial Japan?  bigtree   Mar-15-10 12:17 PM   #15 
              - What's unbelievable is that you think the Taliban is benign  NJmaverick   Mar-15-10 01:42 PM   #17 
     - "Cheering" isn't accurate, although it does provoke a response.  Robb   Mar-15-10 02:10 PM   #18 
        - it was 'deadly for civilians because NATO accounted for a great deal of civilians killed  bigtree   Mar-15-10 07:09 PM   #22 
           - I point to what statistics there are, and you guess.  Robb   Mar-15-10 07:36 PM   #25 
              - Robb, we're unnecessarily killing Afghans, calling all of them Taliban  bigtree   Mar-15-10 07:53 PM   #26 
                 - Pointing out a decrease is NOT "pushing past" the problem.  Robb   Mar-15-10 08:40 PM   #29 
                    - It's a weak straw  bigtree   Mar-15-10 09:49 PM   #32 
                       - If the strategy were as you've chosen to define it, you'd be correct  Robb   Mar-16-10 07:34 AM   #34 
                          - I listened to the President  bigtree   Mar-16-10 10:18 AM   #35 
                             - You hear what you want to hear  Robb   Mar-16-10 03:12 PM   #36 
  - We have no power over the actions of the Taliban  wtmusic   Mar-15-10 10:16 AM   #2 
  - The likelihood of ISAF leaders perusing DU for policy ideas  Robb   Mar-15-10 03:31 PM   #20 
  - Why are they killing each other?  asdjrocky   Mar-15-10 10:22 AM   #3 
  - For once I agree with you, at least in part.  Robb   Mar-15-10 10:34 AM   #4 
     - Obviously killing more people hasn't worked so far.  asdjrocky   Mar-15-10 11:08 AM   #5 
        - We're actually killing *fewer*  Robb   Mar-15-10 02:38 PM   #19 
           - we didn't escalate this occupation to 'open schools' in Afghanistan  bigtree   Mar-15-10 07:28 PM   #24 
  - mission being accomplished  branders seine   Mar-15-10 11:14 AM   #6 
  - you're bashing us for not condemning the Taliban here? You can't be serious.  bigtree   Mar-15-10 11:34 AM   #7 
  - That anger of the Taliban should be aimed at legal military targets...  Ozymanithrax   Mar-15-10 12:04 PM   #12 
  - I don't think the Taliban should be attacking anybody  bigtree   Mar-15-10 12:09 PM   #13 
     - I may not agree with what they think is good government...  Ozymanithrax   Mar-15-10 12:23 PM   #16 
  - The Taliban were killing fellow Afghans long before we invaded Afghanistan  anigbrowl   Mar-15-10 07:59 PM   #27 
     - so, we just jumped right in  bigtree   Mar-15-10 08:03 PM   #28 
        - No Bigtree, that is simply untrue  anigbrowl   Mar-15-10 08:42 PM   #30 
           - I'm referring to our present escalation  bigtree   Mar-15-10 09:25 PM   #31 
              - I appreciate that and respect your view although I disagree with it  anigbrowl   Mar-15-10 10:17 PM   #33 
  - Kick for the evening. nt  Robb   Mar-15-10 06:52 PM   #21 
  - Excellent OP. Kick, Rec. n/t.  apocalypsehow   Mar-15-10 07:19 PM   #23 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC