You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Rosa Parks acted as an individual. So did the others in what became "an organized group" AFTER [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Rosa Parks acted as an individual. So did the others in what became "an organized group" AFTER
she did what she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Taking a stand has never produced any meaningful political change anonymous171  Mar-13-10 03:55 PM   #0 
  - I'll take a principle stand, and K&R this thread.  bvar22   Mar-13-10 05:14 PM   #1 
  - depends, doesn't it?  cali   Mar-13-10 05:16 PM   #2 
  - It's not a broad generalization if it is true. nt  anonymous171   Mar-13-10 05:17 PM   #3 
     - sure it's a broad generalization. it couldn't possibly be ore of one  cali   Mar-13-10 05:19 PM   #4 
        - Name one movement that succeeded by politely asking for the elite to grant recognize their rights.  anonymous171   Mar-13-10 08:35 PM   #29 
  - a lot depends if you're part of an organized group (Rosa Parks) or engaging in empty posturing  KittyWampus   Mar-13-10 05:20 PM   #5 
  - empty posturing is promising a public option on the campaign trail  Donnachaidh   Mar-13-10 05:40 PM   #8 
  - No, that is out and out lying.  alarimer   Mar-13-10 08:51 PM   #34 
  - Rosa Parks acted as an individual. So did the others in what became "an organized group" AFTER  omega minimo   Mar-13-10 06:03 PM   #10 
  - Are you saying that the Democratic Party was lying to the American  sabrina 1   Mar-13-10 06:04 PM   #11 
  - Rosa Parks part of a group? Ummmmm....no. That's in your Texas "history" book.  WinkyDink   Mar-13-10 06:38 PM   #20 
  - Rosa Parks had been involved in the civil rights movement prior to her act of civil disobedience  antigone382   Mar-13-10 08:04 PM   #22 
  - I'm sure many incrementalists thought that Rosa Parks was simply posturing as well  anonymous171   Mar-13-10 08:21 PM   #23 
  - change has occurred because the people DEMANDED it  RainDog   Mar-13-10 05:22 PM   #6 
  - Making a futile and self-defeating stand never helped anyone.  LostInAnomie   Mar-13-10 05:27 PM   #7 
  - You forgot the word immediately at the end of your statement.  athenasatanjesus   Mar-13-10 05:47 PM   #9 
  - No one ever takes a stand that's futile and self-defeating. It's impotent observers who call it that  omega minimo   Mar-13-10 06:05 PM   #12 
  - That's exactly what the elite want you to think... just like a perpetual LOSER  ShamelessHussy   Mar-13-10 06:19 PM   #15 
  - You'd have been great to have around in 1775.  WinkyDink   Mar-13-10 06:40 PM   #21 
  - Someone should tell that to Obama. nt  anonymous171   Mar-13-10 08:25 PM   #24 
  - The belive of those who fall for anything  ShamelessHussy   Mar-13-10 06:09 PM   #13 
  - I've always liked a George Bernard Shaw quote:  spoony   Mar-13-10 06:09 PM   #14 
  - You see things; and you say, Why? But I dream things that never were; and I say, Why not?"  ShamelessHussy   Mar-13-10 06:26 PM   #16 
  - Unfortunately the democrats always try and adapt themselves to the political world  athenasatanjesus   Mar-13-10 06:31 PM   #17 
  - Pround Unreasonable Man here!  Odin2005   Mar-13-10 08:36 PM   #31 
  - Taking a stand is not the same as voting against progress.  ProSense   Mar-13-10 06:34 PM   #18 
  - exactly  JI7   Mar-13-10 08:26 PM   #25 
  - Shoving for profit health insurance further down our throats is not progress.  EFerrari   Mar-13-10 08:30 PM   #27 
  - Yep. It actually inhibits progress since it further entrenches the insurance industry. nt  anonymous171   Mar-13-10 08:33 PM   #28 
  - +1000  Echo In Light   Mar-14-10 08:18 AM   #36 
  - Fascist economics is Progress?  Odin2005   Mar-13-10 08:38 PM   #32 
  - But I bet he would have opposed it if it had required African-Americans  Lydia Leftcoast   Mar-13-10 08:39 PM   #33 
  - What a fucking crock!  ibegurpard   Mar-13-10 06:34 PM   #19 
  - Good point. Kucinich might well be the only person it *hasn't* ever worked for.  BlooInBloo   Mar-13-10 08:27 PM   #26 
  - The only thing in the middle of the road is yellow stripes and roadkill.  Odin2005   Mar-13-10 08:36 PM   #30 
  - But, but...  lwcon   Mar-14-10 06:48 AM   #35 
  - Taking a run never did either, but it's better for your heart.  Kablooie   Mar-14-10 01:45 PM   #37 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC