You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #46: You just got a rec so I could see what happened [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
46. You just got a rec so I could see what happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -I just noticed something new on the rec/unrec feature... CaliforniaPeggy  Mar-03-10 02:51 PM   #0 
  - K n R  Duer 157099   Mar-03-10 02:52 PM   #1 
  - ROFL!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 02:53 PM   #5 
     - K&R #72 for, all I see is "Your vote +1)" - it would help more to see  UTUSN   Mar-03-10 03:09 PM   #24 
     - I agree and would like to add  Tuesday Afternoon   Mar-04-10 11:38 AM   #113 
     - Genius! Brilliant! You've written an OP *about* the unrec function AND you've got positive recs!!!!  NYC_SKP   Mar-03-10 07:07 PM   #68 
     - Wow, Nice grab Peggy  AsahinaKimi   Mar-04-10 06:43 AM   #105 
  - I was just about to post about it!  Hissyspit   Mar-03-10 02:52 PM   #2 
  - Cool!  SharonRB   Mar-03-10 02:52 PM   #3 
  - LOL California Peggy trolling for recs!  Hissyspit   Mar-03-10 02:53 PM   #6 
  - I am NOT!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 02:56 PM   #10 
  - Tres cool.  Hissyspit   Mar-03-10 02:59 PM   #13 
  - 66 Votes in nine minutes.  Hissyspit   Mar-03-10 03:05 PM   #20 
     - That's those Californians for ya!  northofdenali   Mar-03-10 03:36 PM   #40 
  - Yup. Always knew she was a devious one.  closeupready   Mar-03-10 04:10 PM   #53 
  - At least she didn't title it: "Recommend this thread if you want to find out what happens if you  Hissyspit   Mar-03-10 10:58 PM   #98 
  - +1. . lololol  annabanana   Mar-03-10 05:45 PM   #66 
  - truly.  roguevalley   Mar-03-10 10:23 PM   #89 
  - HOLY COW !!! YESSSSSSS!!!!  lamp_shade   Mar-03-10 02:52 PM   #4 
  - K&R...n/t  Oceansaway   Mar-03-10 02:53 PM   #7 
  - I found it right before I opened this discussion...way cool.......  Tippy   Mar-03-10 02:54 PM   #8 
  - Oh sure, give away the secret! Give back your DU decoder ring!  leftofcool   Mar-03-10 02:55 PM   #9 
  - PFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTT!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 03:04 PM   #19 
  - unrecommended for test purposes only  Brother Buzz   Mar-03-10 02:56 PM   #11 
  - Me too ...lol...as in, "Me too!"  Echo In Light   Mar-03-10 03:01 PM   #15 
  - Oh good!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 03:02 PM   #16 
  - I can't unrec a California Peggy post, even for test purposes.  jgraz   Mar-03-10 03:05 PM   #21 
  - LOL....me too :D  slutticus   Mar-03-10 05:26 PM   #61 
  - excellent tool for those of us with Alzheimerrrr...what was I saying?  yurbud   Mar-03-10 02:58 PM   #12 
  - LOL!  inna   Mar-03-10 03:14 PM   #26 
     - sometimes I go back and try to hit rec again and again or I'll type a disagreement to a post  yurbud   Mar-03-10 03:20 PM   #31 
  - Would be useful feature for Republicans.  JBoy   Mar-03-10 03:01 PM   #14 
  - Ha!  meeshrox   Mar-03-10 03:43 PM   #44 
  - I saw it. Not much use to me.  Liberal_in_LA   Mar-03-10 03:03 PM   #17 
  - I don't understand the point of it, either.  inna   Mar-03-10 03:15 PM   #27 
     - I didn't get it at first either, but...  pipi_k   Mar-03-10 08:26 PM   #72 
        - Actually, that makes perfect sense! Thanks for the explanation, and...  inna   Mar-03-10 09:17 PM   #83 
           - No problem...  pipi_k   Mar-03-10 09:24 PM   #85 
  - It's a trick, it's a trick, I tell you. California Peggy just wants to get on the Greatest Page, so  Arkansas Granny   Mar-03-10 03:03 PM   #18 
  - Honestly, my dear Arkansas Granny!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 03:06 PM   #22 
     - Your evil plan is working!  jgraz   Mar-03-10 03:24 PM   #35 
     - I think it's a hoot, especially after all the whining we hear about "unrecs".  Arkansas Granny   Mar-03-10 03:34 PM   #39 
     - Testing 123 n/t  Paper Roses   Mar-03-10 03:58 PM   #50 
  - K & R! It happened for me , too.  TheDebbieDee   Mar-03-10 03:06 PM   #23 
  - 'Your vote + 1'  Bobbie Jo   Mar-03-10 03:10 PM   #25 
  - I like new  Solly Mack   Mar-03-10 03:16 PM   #28 
  - Interesting. Though, I usually remember how I vote.  Behind the Aegis   Mar-03-10 03:17 PM   #29 
  - Kewl.  northofdenali   Mar-03-10 03:19 PM   #30 
  - I had to try it with the unrec just to see what it does  tandot   Mar-03-10 03:20 PM   #32 
  - NO worries, my dear tandot!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 03:23 PM   #34 
  - Would you please educate me...  cameozalaznick   Mar-03-10 03:23 PM   #33 
  - Unless you unrecommend a thread, you won't be able to tell.  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 03:26 PM   #36 
  - The official cover was un-rec = keep certain threads off Greatest Page  Echo In Light   Mar-03-10 03:54 PM   #48 
     - Skinner's in on it. All of it.  Robb   Mar-03-10 05:35 PM   #64 
        - If there were no ulterior agenda, both would have been displayed from unrec's inception  Echo In Light   Mar-04-10 06:55 AM   #106 
           - Well, I give a little poo about it  dbmk   Mar-04-10 11:19 AM   #111 
           - It doesn't matter anyway since its been a failure.  Political Heretic   Mar-04-10 12:53 PM   #119 
              - I was speculating as to the 'whys' of its implementation, not overall/sustained effectiveness  Echo In Light   Mar-04-10 01:09 PM   #121 
  - k&r  Swamp Rat   Mar-03-10 03:26 PM   #37 
  - That's kind of like saying "Hey, I've got this wierd thing in my eye"  jobycom   Mar-03-10 03:32 PM   #38 
  - Pretty cool!  Lugnut   Mar-03-10 03:38 PM   #41 
  - I voted to unrec, just to see what would happen.  Blue-Jay   Mar-03-10 03:39 PM   #42 
  - UNREC!!11!  progressoid   Mar-03-10 03:40 PM   #43 
  - Seems pointless  DJ13   Mar-03-10 03:47 PM   #45 
  - You just got a rec so I could see what happened  ArcticFox   Mar-03-10 03:52 PM   #46 
  - I don't believe it's the *best system, but I do believe it's an improvement.  Uncle Joe   Mar-03-10 03:52 PM   #47 
  - Kinda weird, isn't it...the resistance to displaying both  Echo In Light   Mar-03-10 03:55 PM   #49 
     - I view recommendations in the same light as votes.  Uncle Joe   Mar-03-10 04:10 PM   #52 
        - +1  Echo In Light   Mar-03-10 04:11 PM   #54 
  - re'd. How could I possibly resist for California Peggy!  lunatica   Mar-03-10 04:04 PM   #51 
  - You asked what I think  customerserviceguy   Mar-03-10 04:20 PM   #55 
  - I appreciate your response. (nt)  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 04:23 PM   #56 
  - The Unrecommend should still be deep sixed  SlingBlade   Mar-03-10 04:35 PM   #57 
  - +1 -- seems a silly feature  LuckyLib   Mar-03-10 04:40 PM   #58 
  - Rather see it improved taking into account objections.  Mithreal   Mar-03-10 05:29 PM   #62 
  - In that case, we should also get rid of "rec", amirite?  Blue-Jay   Mar-03-10 05:31 PM   #63 
  - Yeah, that's fun! I noticed it about 5 minutes ago --  Hekate   Mar-03-10 04:57 PM   #59 
  - Where's rec & unrec buttons  julian09   Mar-03-10 07:09 PM   #69 
     - At the bottom of the OP (original post) there's a line that says...  Hekate   Mar-03-10 10:56 PM   #97 
  - Meh  Mithreal   Mar-03-10 05:00 PM   #60 
  - You made me click rec!  Jazzgirl   Mar-03-10 05:44 PM   #65 
  - I think she tricked us all. nt  rhett o rick   Mar-04-10 02:09 PM   #125 
  - This is cool.  noamnety   Mar-03-10 06:51 PM   #67 
  - Looks like no more less-than sign either  slutticus   Mar-03-10 07:50 PM   #70 
  - You're absolutely right! I just noticed that.  inna   Mar-03-10 08:26 PM   #73 
     - They sort of do for the threads that are 50/50  slutticus   Mar-03-10 08:32 PM   #76 
  - Look at this, though.  madfloridian   Mar-03-10 07:57 PM   #71 
  - I like it too  malaise   Mar-03-10 08:27 PM   #74 
  - Yay! I recorded rec #400!  Cerridwen   Mar-03-10 08:27 PM   #75 
  - K&R  Cetacea   Mar-03-10 08:35 PM   #77 
  - how many voted to unrec?  djp2   Mar-03-10 08:50 PM   #78 
  - Booo!!!  Clio the Leo   Mar-03-10 08:50 PM   #79 
  - Hey, whatever it takes to keep you out of trouble!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 09:01 PM   #80 
     - ....  Clio the Leo   Mar-03-10 09:04 PM   #81 
  - Dunno, lemme try it - "Net recommendation: +422 votes (Your vote: +1)", hm...  bridgit   Mar-03-10 09:06 PM   #82 
  - CaliforniaPeggy, I'm rec'ing your post because I feel like it and  saltpoint   Mar-03-10 09:21 PM   #84 
  - Yes to see how many unrecs would be nice! Might make it actually mean something!  sce56   Mar-03-10 09:30 PM   #86 
  - I like it. Sorry I unrec your post just to try it out.  rhett o rick   Mar-03-10 09:42 PM   #87 
  - I just tried it. Sorry for that unrec, but you've got plenty to spare.  pnorman   Mar-03-10 10:21 PM   #88 
  - And your OP is now the most important story on DU  Lorien   Mar-03-10 10:26 PM   #90 
  - I think that unrec's should be required to post, and like say something.  azul   Mar-03-10 10:27 PM   #91 
  - how did this post get +463 recs?  inna   Mar-03-10 10:28 PM   #92 
  - At +648 now. Holy molly. That must be an all-time record! (Or not?!?)  inna   Mar-04-10 12:10 PM   #116 
     - Update: Ended up at +688 after 24 hours.  inna   Mar-04-10 02:58 PM   #126 
  - Peg, I think you've broken the rec record..........  northofdenali   Mar-03-10 10:38 PM   #93 
  - My dear CaliforniaPeggy,  bleever   Mar-03-10 10:43 PM   #94 
  - I just need to confess --  truedelphi   Mar-03-10 10:49 PM   #95 
  - Grand Mom-key Pile!  Ellipsis   Mar-03-10 10:49 PM   #96 
  - Kicking for proof. I call bullshit. I don't believe it!  NYC_SKP   Mar-03-10 11:43 PM   #99 
  - My VERY DEAR NYC_SKP!  CaliforniaPeggy   Mar-03-10 11:50 PM   #100 
     - And SHE'LL DO IT! YES, INDEED!!!  NYC_SKP   Mar-04-10 12:15 AM   #101 
  - Aw shucks,  rabs   Mar-04-10 12:25 AM   #102 
  - And I thought I needed to get a life.  rhett o rick   Mar-04-10 02:08 PM   #124 
  - I'm going to kick this just for the halibut.  northofdenali   Mar-04-10 01:09 AM   #103 
  - I just unrecc'd your post....  Jeff In Milwaukee   Mar-04-10 05:41 AM   #104 
  - Gee, this is more fun than video games  TheCowsCameHome   Mar-04-10 07:27 AM   #107 
  - 625 must be a "REC" record!  beac   Mar-04-10 10:29 AM   #108 
  - I think it should also track it on your own page as to how many rec's and unrec's you've given  Skink   Mar-04-10 10:29 AM   #109 
  - IBTL - Just kidding.  myrna minx   Mar-04-10 10:31 AM   #110 
  - it always shows +1 for me, I don't get it :( n/t  arthritisR_US   Mar-04-10 11:27 AM   #112 
  - unrecommended  JAbuchan08   Mar-04-10 11:51 AM   #114 
  - Oops! Hit the wrong choice. How do you change it? (Answer: You don't.)  Towlie   Mar-04-10 12:09 PM   #115 
  - Whodathunkit? It works!  tango-tee   Mar-04-10 12:35 PM   #117 
  - everyone else seems to be recommending the OP, so I will too!  mike_c   Mar-04-10 12:47 PM   #118 
  - 662 recs, now thats a bunch  madokie   Mar-04-10 12:59 PM   #120 
  - Also noticed the wider Video Titles which allow a bit more description to be read - THANKS DU!!  tomm2thumbs   Mar-04-10 01:15 PM   #122 
  - un-rec'd - does not belong on greatest page  TrogL   Mar-04-10 01:41 PM   #123 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC