Brother Buzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 11. unrecommended for test purposes only |
|
Net recommendation: +16 votes (Your vote: -1)
|
| -I just noticed something new on the rec/unrec feature... |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 02:51 PM |
#0 |
-
K n R |
Duer 157099 |
Mar-03-10 02:52 PM |
#1 |
 -
ROFL! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 02:53 PM |
#5 |
-
K&R #72 for, all I see is "Your vote +1)" - it would help more to see |
UTUSN |
Mar-03-10 03:09 PM |
#24 |
 -
I agree and would like to add |
Tuesday Afternoon |
Mar-04-10 11:38 AM |
#113 |
-
Genius! Brilliant! You've written an OP *about* the unrec function AND you've got positive recs!!!! |
NYC_SKP |
Mar-03-10 07:07 PM |
#68 |
-
Wow, Nice grab Peggy |
AsahinaKimi |
Mar-04-10 06:43 AM |
#105 |
-
I was just about to post about it! |
Hissyspit |
Mar-03-10 02:52 PM |
#2 |
-
Cool! |
SharonRB |
Mar-03-10 02:52 PM |
#3 |
 -
LOL California Peggy trolling for recs! |
Hissyspit |
Mar-03-10 02:53 PM |
#6 |
  -
I am NOT! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 02:56 PM |
#10 |
   -
Tres cool. |
Hissyspit |
Mar-03-10 02:59 PM |
#13 |
   -
66 Votes in nine minutes. |
Hissyspit |
Mar-03-10 03:05 PM |
#20 |
  -
That's those Californians for ya! |
northofdenali |
Mar-03-10 03:36 PM |
#40 |
  -
Yup. Always knew she was a devious one. |
closeupready |
Mar-03-10 04:10 PM |
#53 |
   -
At least she didn't title it: "Recommend this thread if you want to find out what happens if you |
Hissyspit |
Mar-03-10 10:58 PM |
#98 |
  -
+1. . lololol |
annabanana |
Mar-03-10 05:45 PM |
#66 |
 -
truly. |
roguevalley |
Mar-03-10 10:23 PM |
#89 |
-
HOLY COW !!! YESSSSSSS!!!! |
lamp_shade |
Mar-03-10 02:52 PM |
#4 |
-
K&R...n/t |
Oceansaway |
Mar-03-10 02:53 PM |
#7 |
-
I found it right before I opened this discussion...way cool....... |
Tippy |
Mar-03-10 02:54 PM |
#8 |
-
Oh sure, give away the secret! Give back your DU decoder ring! |
leftofcool |
Mar-03-10 02:55 PM |
#9 |
 -
PFFFFFFTTTTTTTTTT! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 03:04 PM |
#19 |
-
unrecommended for test purposes only |
Brother Buzz |
Mar-03-10 02:56 PM |
#11 |
 -
Me too ...lol...as in, "Me too!" |
Echo In Light |
Mar-03-10 03:01 PM |
#15 |
 -
Oh good! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 03:02 PM |
#16 |
 -
I can't unrec a California Peggy post, even for test purposes. |
jgraz |
Mar-03-10 03:05 PM |
#21 |
 -
LOL....me too :D |
slutticus |
Mar-03-10 05:26 PM |
#61 |
-
excellent tool for those of us with Alzheimerrrr...what was I saying? |
yurbud |
Mar-03-10 02:58 PM |
#12 |
 -
LOL! |
inna |
Mar-03-10 03:14 PM |
#26 |
-
sometimes I go back and try to hit rec again and again or I'll type a disagreement to a post |
yurbud |
Mar-03-10 03:20 PM |
#31 |
-
Would be useful feature for Republicans. |
JBoy |
Mar-03-10 03:01 PM |
#14 |
 -
Ha! |
meeshrox |
Mar-03-10 03:43 PM |
#44 |
-
I saw it. Not much use to me. |
Liberal_in_LA |
Mar-03-10 03:03 PM |
#17 |
 -
I don't understand the point of it, either. |
inna |
Mar-03-10 03:15 PM |
#27 |
-
I didn't get it at first either, but... |
pipi_k |
Mar-03-10 08:26 PM |
#72 |
-
Actually, that makes perfect sense! Thanks for the explanation, and... |
inna |
Mar-03-10 09:17 PM |
#83 |
-
No problem... |
pipi_k |
Mar-03-10 09:24 PM |
#85 |
-
It's a trick, it's a trick, I tell you. California Peggy just wants to get on the Greatest Page, so |
Arkansas Granny |
Mar-03-10 03:03 PM |
#18 |
 -
Honestly, my dear Arkansas Granny! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 03:06 PM |
#22 |
-
Your evil plan is working! |
jgraz |
Mar-03-10 03:24 PM |
#35 |
-
I think it's a hoot, especially after all the whining we hear about "unrecs". |
Arkansas Granny |
Mar-03-10 03:34 PM |
#39 |
-
Testing 123 n/t |
Paper Roses |
Mar-03-10 03:58 PM |
#50 |
-
K & R! It happened for me , too. |
TheDebbieDee |
Mar-03-10 03:06 PM |
#23 |
-
'Your vote + 1' |
Bobbie Jo |
Mar-03-10 03:10 PM |
#25 |
-
I like new |
Solly Mack |
Mar-03-10 03:16 PM |
#28 |
-
Interesting. Though, I usually remember how I vote. |
Behind the Aegis |
Mar-03-10 03:17 PM |
#29 |
-
Kewl. |
northofdenali |
Mar-03-10 03:19 PM |
#30 |
-
I had to try it with the unrec just to see what it does |
tandot |
Mar-03-10 03:20 PM |
#32 |
 -
NO worries, my dear tandot! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 03:23 PM |
#34 |
-
Would you please educate me... |
cameozalaznick |
Mar-03-10 03:23 PM |
#33 |
 -
Unless you unrecommend a thread, you won't be able to tell. |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 03:26 PM |
#36 |
 -
The official cover was un-rec = keep certain threads off Greatest Page |
Echo In Light |
Mar-03-10 03:54 PM |
#48 |
-
Skinner's in on it. All of it. |
Robb |
Mar-03-10 05:35 PM |
#64 |
-
If there were no ulterior agenda, both would have been displayed from unrec's inception |
Echo In Light |
Mar-04-10 06:55 AM |
#106 |
-
Well, I give a little poo about it |
dbmk |
Mar-04-10 11:19 AM |
#111 |
-
It doesn't matter anyway since its been a failure. |
Political Heretic |
Mar-04-10 12:53 PM |
#119 |
-
I was speculating as to the 'whys' of its implementation, not overall/sustained effectiveness |
Echo In Light |
Mar-04-10 01:09 PM |
#121 |
-
k&r |
Swamp Rat |
Mar-03-10 03:26 PM |
#37 |
-
That's kind of like saying "Hey, I've got this wierd thing in my eye" |
jobycom |
Mar-03-10 03:32 PM |
#38 |
-
Pretty cool! |
Lugnut |
Mar-03-10 03:38 PM |
#41 |
-
I voted to unrec, just to see what would happen. |
Blue-Jay |
Mar-03-10 03:39 PM |
#42 |
-
UNREC!!11! |
progressoid |
Mar-03-10 03:40 PM |
#43 |
-
Seems pointless |
DJ13 |
Mar-03-10 03:47 PM |
#45 |
-
You just got a rec so I could see what happened |
ArcticFox |
Mar-03-10 03:52 PM |
#46 |
-
I don't believe it's the *best system, but I do believe it's an improvement. |
Uncle Joe |
Mar-03-10 03:52 PM |
#47 |
 -
Kinda weird, isn't it...the resistance to displaying both |
Echo In Light |
Mar-03-10 03:55 PM |
#49 |
-
I view recommendations in the same light as votes. |
Uncle Joe |
Mar-03-10 04:10 PM |
#52 |
-
+1 |
Echo In Light |
Mar-03-10 04:11 PM |
#54 |
-
re'd. How could I possibly resist for California Peggy! |
lunatica |
Mar-03-10 04:04 PM |
#51 |
-
You asked what I think |
customerserviceguy |
Mar-03-10 04:20 PM |
#55 |
 -
I appreciate your response. (nt) |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 04:23 PM |
#56 |
-
The Unrecommend should still be deep sixed |
SlingBlade |
Mar-03-10 04:35 PM |
#57 |
 -
+1 -- seems a silly feature |
LuckyLib |
Mar-03-10 04:40 PM |
#58 |
 -
Rather see it improved taking into account objections. |
Mithreal |
Mar-03-10 05:29 PM |
#62 |
 -
In that case, we should also get rid of "rec", amirite? |
Blue-Jay |
Mar-03-10 05:31 PM |
#63 |
-
Yeah, that's fun! I noticed it about 5 minutes ago -- |
Hekate |
Mar-03-10 04:57 PM |
#59 |
 -
Where's rec & unrec buttons |
julian09 |
Mar-03-10 07:09 PM |
#69 |
-
At the bottom of the OP (original post) there's a line that says... |
Hekate |
Mar-03-10 10:56 PM |
#97 |
-
Meh |
Mithreal |
Mar-03-10 05:00 PM |
#60 |
-
You made me click rec! |
Jazzgirl |
Mar-03-10 05:44 PM |
#65 |
 -
I think she tricked us all. nt |
rhett o rick |
Mar-04-10 02:09 PM |
#125 |
-
This is cool. |
noamnety |
Mar-03-10 06:51 PM |
#67 |
-
Looks like no more less-than sign either |
slutticus |
Mar-03-10 07:50 PM |
#70 |
 -
You're absolutely right! I just noticed that. |
inna |
Mar-03-10 08:26 PM |
#73 |
-
They sort of do for the threads that are 50/50 |
slutticus |
Mar-03-10 08:32 PM |
#76 |
-
Look at this, though. |
madfloridian |
Mar-03-10 07:57 PM |
#71 |
-
I like it too |
malaise |
Mar-03-10 08:27 PM |
#74 |
-
Yay! I recorded rec #400! |
Cerridwen |
Mar-03-10 08:27 PM |
#75 |
-
K&R |
Cetacea |
Mar-03-10 08:35 PM |
#77 |
-
how many voted to unrec? |
djp2 |
Mar-03-10 08:50 PM |
#78 |
-
Booo!!! |
Clio the Leo |
Mar-03-10 08:50 PM |
#79 |
 -
Hey, whatever it takes to keep you out of trouble! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 09:01 PM |
#80 |
-
.... |
Clio the Leo |
Mar-03-10 09:04 PM |
#81 |
-
Dunno, lemme try it - "Net recommendation: +422 votes (Your vote: +1)", hm... |
bridgit |
Mar-03-10 09:06 PM |
#82 |
-
CaliforniaPeggy, I'm rec'ing your post because I feel like it and |
saltpoint |
Mar-03-10 09:21 PM |
#84 |
-
Yes to see how many unrecs would be nice! Might make it actually mean something! |
sce56 |
Mar-03-10 09:30 PM |
#86 |
-
I like it. Sorry I unrec your post just to try it out. |
rhett o rick |
Mar-03-10 09:42 PM |
#87 |
-
I just tried it. Sorry for that unrec, but you've got plenty to spare. |
pnorman |
Mar-03-10 10:21 PM |
#88 |
-
And your OP is now the most important story on DU |
Lorien |
Mar-03-10 10:26 PM |
#90 |
-
I think that unrec's should be required to post, and like say something. |
azul |
Mar-03-10 10:27 PM |
#91 |
-
how did this post get +463 recs? |
inna |
Mar-03-10 10:28 PM |
#92 |
 -
At +648 now. Holy molly. That must be an all-time record! (Or not?!?) |
inna |
Mar-04-10 12:10 PM |
#116 |
-
Update: Ended up at +688 after 24 hours. |
inna |
Mar-04-10 02:58 PM |
#126 |
-
Peg, I think you've broken the rec record.......... |
northofdenali |
Mar-03-10 10:38 PM |
#93 |
-
My dear CaliforniaPeggy, |
bleever |
Mar-03-10 10:43 PM |
#94 |
-
I just need to confess -- |
truedelphi |
Mar-03-10 10:49 PM |
#95 |
-
Grand Mom-key Pile! |
Ellipsis |
Mar-03-10 10:49 PM |
#96 |
-
Kicking for proof. I call bullshit. I don't believe it! |
NYC_SKP |
Mar-03-10 11:43 PM |
#99 |
 -
My VERY DEAR NYC_SKP! |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Mar-03-10 11:50 PM |
#100 |
-
And SHE'LL DO IT! YES, INDEED!!! |
NYC_SKP |
Mar-04-10 12:15 AM |
#101 |
-
Aw shucks, |
rabs |
Mar-04-10 12:25 AM |
#102 |
 -
And I thought I needed to get a life. |
rhett o rick |
Mar-04-10 02:08 PM |
#124 |
-
I'm going to kick this just for the halibut. |
northofdenali |
Mar-04-10 01:09 AM |
#103 |
-
I just unrecc'd your post.... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Mar-04-10 05:41 AM |
#104 |
-
Gee, this is more fun than video games |
TheCowsCameHome |
Mar-04-10 07:27 AM |
#107 |
-
625 must be a "REC" record! |
beac |
Mar-04-10 10:29 AM |
#108 |
-
I think it should also track it on your own page as to how many rec's and unrec's you've given |
Skink |
Mar-04-10 10:29 AM |
#109 |
-
IBTL - Just kidding. |
myrna minx |
Mar-04-10 10:31 AM |
#110 |
-
it always shows +1 for me, I don't get it :( n/t |
arthritisR_US |
Mar-04-10 11:27 AM |
#112 |
-
unrecommended |
JAbuchan08 |
Mar-04-10 11:51 AM |
#114 |
-
Oops! Hit the wrong choice. How do you change it? (Answer: You don't.) |
Towlie |
Mar-04-10 12:09 PM |
#115 |
-
Whodathunkit? It works! |
tango-tee |
Mar-04-10 12:35 PM |
#117 |
-
everyone else seems to be recommending the OP, so I will too! |
mike_c |
Mar-04-10 12:47 PM |
#118 |
-
662 recs, now thats a bunch |
madokie |
Mar-04-10 12:59 PM |
#120 |
-
Also noticed the wider Video Titles which allow a bit more description to be read - THANKS DU!! |
tomm2thumbs |
Mar-04-10 01:15 PM |
#122 |
-
un-rec'd - does not belong on greatest page |
TrogL |
Mar-04-10 01:41 PM |
#123 |