You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: Sheesh. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
52. Sheesh.
1) the information isn't available "publicly" for 70 years!
2) they are also a precious resource for historians.
3) furure generations should be denied the right to geneologica information just because Great-grandparents weren't interested?
4) Believe it or not, future generations might actually find "scandals" a little bit interesting WITHOUT putting a value judgement on it. It helps round out the names on a list into more than names on a list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Genealogists trying to stop the planned destruction of 2010 census images. madfloridian  Mar-01-10 04:20 PM   #0 
  - K&R  lazarus   Mar-01-10 04:26 PM   #1 
  - Finding family on a census is a special moment.  madfloridian   Mar-01-10 04:33 PM   #2 
     - I hope the genealogists fail. The census was never meant for them to exploit.  Towlie   Mar-02-10 09:04 AM   #45 
        - I can't believe what you are saying. How inhumane. The census has a 70 year lock  peacetalksforall   Mar-02-10 09:19 AM   #46 
        - What is not legitimate about census data?  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-02-10 10:58 AM   #56 
        - I second Raleigh's comment. My family is extremely grateful for the genealogy work I've done.  bulloney   Mar-02-10 11:55 AM   #61 
        - Passing a law restricting census data for 40 years would be a drastic shortening of the lock time  Posteritatis   Mar-02-10 12:15 PM   #64 
           - Thanks - so I discovered reading further on.  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-04-10 09:35 AM   #80 
        - My family data is on those findings and maybe you can have them  jwirr   Mar-02-10 12:57 PM   #67 
        - I agree, my mother is 91 and she was in the 1920 census  goclark   Mar-02-10 06:55 PM   #75 
        - "Exploit"? That is a bizarre choice of words.  WinkyDink   Mar-02-10 06:50 PM   #73 
  - Okay I'll bite.  madfloridian   Mar-01-10 04:34 PM   #3 
  - Can't imagine the reasons for the unrecs but what concerns me  Fire1   Mar-01-10 04:47 PM   #7 
     - It's to stop ACORN from turning us all into negroes, or something  nxylas   Mar-02-10 06:38 AM   #42 
  - The 1890 census records were burned, but not intentionally.  Gormy Cuss   Mar-01-10 04:42 PM   #4 
  - The last time I went to the archives building, I was informed that  Shell Beau   Mar-01-10 08:15 PM   #26 
     - Yeah, that's to protect privacy.  Gormy Cuss   Mar-01-10 09:01 PM   #29 
        - I bet. That is pretty cool.  Shell Beau   Mar-01-10 09:26 PM   #31 
  - I don't see a need to destroy them either  kctim   Mar-01-10 04:46 PM   #5 
  - too bad my privacy more important than some hobbyist's family tree, sheesh  pitohui   Mar-01-10 04:47 PM   #6 
  - To many people and cultures, lineage is more than a mere  Fire1   Mar-01-10 04:51 PM   #8 
  - Then let them sign an option to keep their own records safe  Cronus Protagonist   Mar-01-10 05:03 PM   #13 
  - For most, it's not a hobby, it's about knowing where one came from  KingFlorez   Mar-01-10 04:56 PM   #11 
  - Plus there is really only the most basic of information in most census years.  csziggy   Mar-02-10 01:38 AM   #36 
  - Wow! What an unpleasant post.  madfloridian   Mar-01-10 05:00 PM   #12 
  - Do you know that the Census records are not made available to the public for 72 years?  LiberalFighter   Mar-01-10 05:26 PM   #15 
  - To check out the claims that some people were making  pipi_k   Mar-01-10 05:48 PM   #16 
     - I was looking at the 1930 census recently  dalaigh lllama   Mar-01-10 07:34 PM   #20 
     - They should have box to indicate if an idiot lives in the home.  LiberalFighter   Mar-01-10 08:03 PM   #22 
        - Actually one of the census records I got from Indiana did record  jwirr   Mar-02-10 01:15 PM   #68 
     - I know.  LiberalFighter   Mar-01-10 07:58 PM   #21 
     - There were a few yearbook panics in my hometown a few years ago actually  Posteritatis   Mar-01-10 08:06 PM   #24 
     - Oh geez...Obituaries!  pipi_k   Mar-01-10 08:22 PM   #28 
     - For anyone who does want to see the questions, here is a link to them  csziggy   Mar-02-10 01:41 AM   #37 
        - Thanks. Appreciate the link.  madfloridian   Mar-02-10 07:20 AM   #43 
  - I agree  Duchess   Mar-01-10 05:54 PM   #17 
  - It's not just Geneology. It's History.  verges   Mar-02-10 10:32 AM   #53 
  - There are legitimate uses for family histories  WolverineDG   Mar-01-10 06:20 PM   #18 
  - The records aren't open to the public for 70 years  dalaigh lllama   Mar-01-10 07:22 PM   #19 
  - I just don't get that. By the time your records are available, you'll  Shell Beau   Mar-01-10 08:17 PM   #27 
  - Chances are good that you'll be dead before 2010 microdata is released to the public  Gormy Cuss   Mar-01-10 09:03 PM   #30 
  - Well lah-dee-dah. The US census is actually a requirement of the US Constitution...  Hekate   Mar-02-10 01:13 AM   #33 
  - Fiddle dee dee  Tsiyu   Mar-02-10 09:01 PM   #79 
  - That's pretty silly, I would say  Spider Jerusalem   Mar-02-10 02:55 AM   #38 
  - I Think You May be Underestimating the Relevance  On the Road   Mar-02-10 06:46 PM   #71 
  - Are you sure you know what you mean when you say 'public records'?  peacetalksforall   Mar-02-10 09:36 AM   #48 
  - Sheesh.  verges   Mar-02-10 10:28 AM   #52 
  - WTF? Family secrets?  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-02-10 11:12 AM   #57 
  - The 1921 fire that destroyed the 1890 census was accidental  dragonlady   Mar-01-10 04:52 PM   #9 
  - They should be retained  KingFlorez   Mar-01-10 04:52 PM   #10 
  - Why are they going to save the images on microfilm?  LiberalFighter   Mar-01-10 05:10 PM   #14 
  - PDFs won't be readable in seventy years; microfilm will  Posteritatis   Mar-01-10 08:04 PM   #23 
  - This is another reason I really dislike digital cameras  jmowreader   Mar-02-10 09:32 AM   #47 
     - A high-end digital camera  verges   Mar-02-10 10:40 AM   #55 
        - You still have the problem of keeping the "negatives" around long-term  Posteritatis   Mar-02-10 12:05 PM   #62 
        - I agree.  verges   Mar-02-10 12:55 PM   #66 
           - Yeah, a $20,000 Hasselblad D-SLR might be as good as a $700 Nikon SLR.  WinkyDink   Mar-02-10 06:55 PM   #74 
        - YOUR standard photography, maybe...  jmowreader   Mar-02-10 08:48 PM   #78 
  - Electronic data is not only not stable, it is often not reliably transferable to new computers....  Hekate   Mar-02-10 01:23 AM   #35 
  - Digital media deteriorates!  verges   Mar-02-10 10:37 AM   #54 
  - Not to mention the extinction of letter-writing. And now Tweets are surpassing even e-mails.  WinkyDink   Mar-02-10 06:57 PM   #76 
  - There is nothing permanent about computer images.  RaleighNCDUer   Mar-02-10 11:23 AM   #58 
  - I have had to use to records for my job at times, and they  Shell Beau   Mar-01-10 08:12 PM   #25 
  - I think this country has gone mad. My mom wrote 5 genealogy books of the family lines...  Hekate   Mar-02-10 01:04 AM   #32 
  - In the age of .pdf, why do this???  JCMach1   Mar-02-10 01:20 AM   #34 
  - Because PDFs are terrible for archival purposes. (nt)  Posteritatis   Mar-02-10 12:11 PM   #63 
  - If the data is archived anyway, does it matter if the forms themselves are tossed? nt  bos1   Mar-02-10 04:29 AM   #39 
  - Yes.  madfloridian   Mar-02-10 07:25 AM   #44 
     - The data will not be available to the public after the waiting period? nt  bos1   Mar-02-10 09:59 AM   #50 
        - The "data" is just numbers.  madfloridian   Mar-02-10 10:21 AM   #51 
           - Really? The data being archived does not include names?  bos1   Mar-02-10 04:38 PM   #70 
  - Census records are kept sealed for 72 years...  rasputin1952   Mar-02-10 05:50 AM   #40 
  - Considering What this Census Process Costs  Demeter   Mar-02-10 06:35 AM   #41 
  - I started family history using census records - the research was the greatest  peacetalksforall   Mar-02-10 09:48 AM   #49 
  - if they destroy it who in the future can question redistricting and the fraud of our elections?  flyarm   Mar-02-10 11:34 AM   #59 
  - That thought went through my mind as well. I am disgusted at the madness of our worship of...  Hekate   Mar-02-10 02:19 PM   #69 
  - Michelle Bachman doesn't want anyone tracing her ancestors...  progressoid   Mar-02-10 11:37 AM   #60 
  - This is insane. They have no reason to do this what so ever.  jwirr   Mar-02-10 12:50 PM   #65 
  - Penny wise, pound foolish. Destroy history; it's what Fascists like to do.  WinkyDink   Mar-02-10 06:49 PM   #72 
  - Oh that's sickening  JustAnotherGen   Mar-02-10 07:32 PM   #77 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC