You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: oh well...at least twice a year some dumb fuck writes the same crap... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. oh well...at least twice a year some dumb fuck writes the same crap...
a vain attempt to scare the geezers like me....sorry we ain`t that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -More Social Security Scare Stories Hannah Bell  Feb-16-10 04:02 PM   #0 
  - The Social Security surplus was used as general fund revenues.  Jim__   Feb-16-10 04:05 PM   #1 
  - The wealthy have spent the money, now they want to cover their tracks  DJ13   Feb-16-10 04:17 PM   #2 
  - But that would mean reneging on Fed government bonds.  damntexdem   Feb-16-10 04:58 PM   #6 
     - No, they'll go back to the dumb idea of Social Security "investment accounts"  DJ13   Feb-16-10 08:40 PM   #14 
     - It wouldn't have to mean that.  Igel   Feb-16-10 11:09 PM   #21 
  - Yes, we need to distinguish between "cash" and "assets"  NoNothing   Feb-16-10 04:20 PM   #3 
  - The cash comes from rescinding the Bush INCOME tax cuts on the top 5%, which will produce about 1  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 05:02 PM   #7 
  - 1 trillion doesn't balance the budget for one year.  dkf   Feb-16-10 05:32 PM   #8 
  - WTF does "balancing the budget" have to do with anything? You asked me where the money to pay off  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 08:50 PM   #16 
     - Balancing the budget means not creating new debt. That doesn't begin to pay it down.  dkf   Feb-17-10 10:31 PM   #27 
  - Hannah, taxing is NOT collecting. Unless there is a secret account out there  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 05:48 PM   #11 
     - When people say SS = Ponzi, it tells me they don't know what a Ponzi scheme is, or they don't know  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 09:00 PM   #17 
     - It requires future payments to be made from future revenue.  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 09:37 PM   #19 
        - Ha! Knew you couldn't do it.  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 10:39 PM   #20 
           - Ok. Good, now we are getting somewhere.  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 11:20 PM   #22 
              - Your post is gobbledygook, sorry.  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 11:28 PM   #23 
                 - OK, OK your right. SS will be there forever. But according to this IMF document, what will it buy??  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 11:35 PM   #24 
                    - i never asserted anything close to "SS will be there forever." It won't if people follow your type  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 11:45 PM   #25 
     - dupe  Hannah Bell   Feb-16-10 09:00 PM   #18 
  - And distinguish between assets and liabilities. n/t  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 05:50 PM   #12 
     - They're assets to the trust fund  NoNothing   Feb-16-10 07:21 PM   #13 
        - I felt it necessary to clarify. Also, I agree with your greater fool theory. n/t  galileoreloaded   Feb-16-10 08:43 PM   #15 
  - Social security funds gave  Enthusiast   Feb-16-10 04:45 PM   #5 
  - oh well...at least twice a year some dumb fuck writes the same crap...  madrchsod   Feb-16-10 04:27 PM   #4 
  - The CBO lists this debt of the government to the SS trust fund  Samantha   Feb-16-10 05:43 PM   #9 
  - Plus, consider the "illegals" who pay into it and will never get to draw benefits.  ThomWV   Feb-16-10 05:44 PM   #10 
  - Reagan/Greenspan spent it, then Saturday Night Live mocked Al Gore's "Lockbox"  troubledamerican   Feb-16-10 11:54 PM   #26 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC