You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: Yes. Its rules are absurd, and so is its allocation procedure. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. Yes. Its rules are absurd, and so is its allocation procedure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Should the Senate be ABOLISHED? yurbud  Feb-12-10 05:03 PM   #0 
  - The Senate serves a valuable purpose in deciding  Warpy   Feb-12-10 05:11 PM   #1 
  - I'm not impressed with their foreign policy work either. Did they stop the Iraq War?  yurbud   Feb-12-10 05:23 PM   #6 
     - They set conditions that Stupid simply ignored.  Warpy   Feb-12-10 06:05 PM   #12 
  - I don't see how abolishing the senate could help us at all.  Mike 03   Feb-12-10 05:14 PM   #2 
  - nope.  dysfunctional press   Feb-12-10 05:15 PM   #3 
  - No, it's the fillibuster that should be abolished.  damntexdem   Feb-12-10 05:16 PM   #4 
  - Since this poll is non-binding, i'm voting my emotions  maxsolomon   Feb-12-10 05:22 PM   #5 
  - that sums it up pretty well  yurbud   Feb-13-10 10:52 AM   #14 
  - It does indeed (n/t)  mitchum   Feb-13-10 10:53 AM   #15 
  - No. They empower sparsely populated flat states that rely on agri-biz. nt  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 10:58 AM   #18 
  - LOL!  Greyhound   Feb-13-10 11:07 AM   #23 
  - I cheated.  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 11:50 AM   #32 
  - Versus densly populated states (like NY) that are completely reliant on Wall St?  anonymous171   Feb-13-10 11:53 AM   #34 
     - The NYS senators represent a LOT more people than the Sens in flat states. nt  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 06:38 PM   #42 
        - In theory they do, but is that the reality?  Sebastian Doyle   Feb-14-10 03:48 PM   #53 
  - That is their constituency.  Greyhound   Feb-13-10 11:06 AM   #22 
  - If you take them away what would lobbiest do?  liberal N proud   Feb-12-10 05:29 PM   #7 
  - I never thought I'd say this....  KonaKane   Feb-12-10 05:39 PM   #8 
  - The senate is an incredibly undemocratic institution...  MellowDem   Feb-12-10 05:42 PM   #9 
  - As it is now, I would say yes.  LuvNewcastle   Feb-12-10 05:50 PM   #10 
  - I don't even think they are arguing. If it's good for Wall Street, they do it. If its good for us,  yurbud   Feb-12-10 07:54 PM   #13 
  - the Senate is undemocratic. Ditch it.  provis99   Feb-12-10 05:50 PM   #11 
  - It's our House of Lords that grossly over empowers a small % of the population. nt  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 10:57 AM   #16 
  - Not abolished  Mz Pip   Feb-13-10 10:57 AM   #17 
  - At the very least, D.C. should get two senators. If that isn't taxation without  change_notfinetuning   Feb-13-10 10:59 AM   #19 
  - that should be a slam dunk victory for the Democrats  yurbud   Feb-13-10 11:02 AM   #20 
  - I think it is more accurate to say that they are unwilling to lose the multitude of opportunities  Greyhound   Feb-13-10 11:11 AM   #24 
  - Yes, or give it back to Maryland. nt  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 11:21 AM   #26 
  - Give it one House representative, but no Senators. (Wyoming should have none, too.) n/t  Unvanguard   Feb-13-10 02:24 PM   #41 
  - Yes. Its rules are absurd, and so is its allocation procedure. n/t  Unvanguard   Feb-13-10 11:04 AM   #21 
  - No, but voters should take their part of the work more seriously  havocmom   Feb-13-10 11:12 AM   #25 
  - In it's current form, yes. At the moment - with 60 votes needed on anything -  Vinca   Feb-13-10 11:23 AM   #27 
  - No; Make media fair, campaign and election reform  upi402   Feb-13-10 11:24 AM   #28 
  - Campaigning is good for democracy. We should shorten Senate terms. nt  anonymous171   Feb-13-10 11:27 AM   #29 
  - I'd rather abolish a few corporations  Jack Rabbit   Feb-13-10 11:32 AM   #30 
  - the role of the Senate dates back  melm00se   Feb-13-10 11:35 AM   #31 
  - Isn't it in the Iroquois Constitution?  Captain Hilts   Feb-13-10 11:51 AM   #33 
     - the Iroquois Constitution  melm00se   Feb-13-10 12:04 PM   #36 
        - The Great Law  H2O Man   Feb-13-10 07:57 PM   #45 
  - The Brits didn't "do away" with the House of Lords.  harkadog   Feb-13-10 12:03 PM   #35 
  - No, but I do think terms should be reduced 4 years  KingFlorez   Feb-13-10 12:11 PM   #37 
  - The filibuster is illegal according to the Constitution.  dfgrbac   Feb-13-10 12:31 PM   #38 
  - My copy of the Constitution does not say that.  harkadog   Feb-13-10 01:13 PM   #39 
     - No super-majority rule!  dfgrbac   Feb-14-10 03:40 PM   #50 
        - Article I, Section 5 says each House may determine the  harkadog   Feb-14-10 04:25 PM   #56 
           - Rules of proceedings  dfgrbac   Feb-16-10 11:38 AM   #57 
  - Just change their name to the "House of Lords", because that is how they act!  DailyGrind51   Feb-13-10 01:44 PM   #40 
  - It won't happen, but yes.  Vidar   Feb-13-10 07:30 PM   #43 
  - The Senate serves a valuable purpose - when it functions properly.  baldguy   Feb-13-10 07:53 PM   #44 
  - And give DC its due representatives  adamuu   Feb-13-10 08:06 PM   #46 
  - Our short term desires should reign supreme. Abolish it!  timeforpeace   Feb-13-10 08:07 PM   #47 
  - In order to abolish the Senate, you need 67 Senators to agree to abolish the Senate  WeDidIt   Feb-13-10 08:25 PM   #48 
  - That really shouldn't be a problem  Sebastian Doyle   Feb-14-10 03:51 PM   #54 
  - The House of Lords has not been abolished.  TheBigotBasher   Feb-13-10 08:26 PM   #49 
  - I thought so, I just saw members of the House of Lords grilling Puppy Blair.  Uzybone   Feb-14-10 03:44 PM   #52 
  - No. But it needs radical change  Uzybone   Feb-14-10 03:43 PM   #51 
  - That's some useful populism I can get behind. No campaign finance reform?  readmoreoften   Feb-14-10 04:20 PM   #55 
  - Yes, and abolish the Electoral College while you're at it too.  inna   Feb-16-10 11:48 AM   #58 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC