You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: You have the "correct" facts, but the wrong conclusions. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-11-10 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. You have the "correct" facts, but the wrong conclusions.
It is true that IC's are manufactured with redundant parts to allow for bad components in any given batch.

Each IC is tested and if any part of the circuit is found to be bad, that part of the IC is blocked and isolated by the chip manufacturer so that it is effectively removed from the chip.

Once the IC chip is inserted in the device, printer, monitor, or whatever, and programmed, a failure in a single gate in a register or control circuit can cause the functionality to fail. The software can have subtle bugs that show up only under certain conditions (that is true for practically all software). The more complex the software, the more likely it has not been completely debugged.

Complex equipment that is expensive to replace is usually designed to be "economically" repairable. Parts costs are usually inexpensive. The labor costs can be high because one needs expensive test equipment and service manuals to find and fix the problems, and it often takes a lot of time. You don't toss a device that costs $3,000 or $4,000 because one IC chip fails.

On the other hand, two years ago, I "tossed" a $100 ink jet printer that failed catastrophically less than a year after I bought it. I had bought it from Best Buy and had paid for the extended warranty. I took it in for repair, and they called me a week later, and said it was unrepairable because the manufacturer didn't even have replacement parts for it. They sold me another printer for the difference in price from the broken model, but only because I had purchased their extended warranty. If I had relied on the manufacturer's warranty (one year parts, 90 days labor) I would have had nothing to show for my purchase.

For want of a $2.00 IC chip, the printer case, print head assembly, ink cartridges (two new ones I had installed shortly before it failed) paper tray and paper feed mechanism "went to the land fill". That is wasteful, and it happened because the manufacturer decided it was cheaper FOR IT to toss the unit rather than make it repairable.

This kind of occurrence happens again and again everyday with all kinds of items.

By the way, I worked as an electronics technician for over twenty years, and one transistor in an IC chip can fail and cause the entire device to stop working.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC