Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-08-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 24. She's a Camille Paglia wannabe. A fake feminist who wants the boys to like her. eom |
| -Tebow Hysteria - Why? |
Jack_Dawson |
Feb-08-10 04:36 PM |
#0 |
 -
The implication of the ad is that "strong" women continue their pregnancies no matter what. |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-08-10 04:38 PM |
#1 |
  -
I've watched that ad several times |
shadowrider |
Feb-08-10 04:46 PM |
#5 |
| -
"to carry her pregnancy through regardless of the personal consequences to her own health..." |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-08-10 04:49 PM |
#9 |
| -
I'm not her |
shadowrider |
Feb-08-10 04:52 PM |
#14 |
| -
Yeah, that's why she did an ad for an avowedly anti-choice organization. |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-08-10 05:02 PM |
#19 |
| -
Oh, sure. And Focus on the Family, that homophobic, anti-woman |
EFerrari |
Feb-08-10 05:04 PM |
#21 |
| -
Your opinion may differ |
shadowrider |
Feb-08-10 05:22 PM |
#27 |
| -
The right to choose to carry your baby has never been in jeopardy in this country |
laughingliberal |
Feb-09-10 12:54 AM |
#39 |
| -
Exactly. The ad was pointless on the surface, but designed to stir controversy. nt |
blondeatlast |
Feb-10-10 06:47 PM |
#66 |
| -
And We Have A Winner |
ProfessorGAC |
Feb-10-10 07:12 PM |
#74 |
| -
DING DING DING! Shadowrider, you're our grand prize winner! |
rocktivity |
Feb-09-10 08:08 AM |
#43 |
| -
It's unclear if it worked or not |
Johonny |
Feb-08-10 04:43 PM |
#2 |
| -
And the column. Ugh. Just. Ugh. |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-08-10 04:44 PM |
#3 |
| -
Yes, I kept thinking this woman's a feminist like Rush Limbaugh's a feminist. nt |
laughingliberal |
Feb-09-10 12:55 AM |
#40 |
| -
Well for starters |
SoCalNative |
Feb-08-10 04:45 PM |
#4 |
| -
May I ask |
shadowrider |
Feb-08-10 04:48 PM |
#7 |
| -
I wouldn't call her a liar. But her story wouldn't hold up |
stanwyck |
Feb-08-10 04:58 PM |
#17 |
| -
"Some say' here that she 'may have' lied about being advised |
Obamanaut |
Feb-09-10 08:30 AM |
#45 |
| -
Good points. |
stanwyck |
Feb-09-10 01:57 PM |
#49 |
| -
When did you hear her tell her story? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Feb-10-10 12:48 AM |
#56 |
| -
My information is that |
SoCalNative |
Feb-08-10 06:54 PM |
#31 |
| -
Illegal and not performed or recommended are not the same. Please |
Obamanaut |
Feb-09-10 03:00 PM |
#51 |
| -
I missed that part of the commercial. When did she mention abortion? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Feb-10-10 12:43 AM |
#54 |
| -
Bullshit |
MadBadger |
Feb-08-10 04:48 PM |
#6 |
| -
Oh but I do... :-) Even Wisconsin n/t |
Jack_Dawson |
Feb-08-10 05:07 PM |
#22 |
| -
Right wing dumbfucks seem to be interesting to the media - take Palin for example. |
HopeHoops |
Feb-08-10 04:49 PM |
#8 |
| -
What part of this disgusting screed appealed to you most? |
Warpy |
Feb-08-10 04:49 PM |
#10 |
| -
I kind of wonder how many |
Mz Pip |
Feb-08-10 04:50 PM |
#11 |
| -
people were not outraged about the ad (unseen) it was the idea of unfairness. |
spanone |
Feb-08-10 04:51 PM |
#12 |
| -
I have two issues with Tebow and the ad |
MadHound |
Feb-08-10 04:51 PM |
#13 |
| -
You say there is the admonition to practice one's faith privately. There |
Obamanaut |
Feb-09-10 09:48 AM |
#47 |
| -
I agree with the Planned parenthood response to the ad |
etherealtruth |
Feb-08-10 04:55 PM |
#15 |
| -
That is a brilliant response. |
Caliman73 |
Feb-08-10 04:59 PM |
#18 |
| -
Can I K&R a response? |
HughMoran |
Feb-10-10 06:31 PM |
#63 |
| -
Missed point |
Caliman73 |
Feb-08-10 04:56 PM |
#16 |
| -
She's a Camille Paglia wannabe. A fake feminist who wants the boys to like her. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-08-10 05:08 PM |
#24 |
| -
I imagine that would be the case. |
Caliman73 |
Feb-08-10 05:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
+1 nt |
laughingliberal |
Feb-09-10 12:57 AM |
#41 |
| -
You're awfully laid back about the rights of other people. |
EFerrari |
Feb-08-10 05:03 PM |
#20 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-08-10 05:28 PM |
#28 |
| -
It's her *choice* to have a kid! |
Jack_Dawson |
Feb-08-10 06:06 PM |
#30 |
| -
How much tolerance should I have for an organization bent on |
EFerrari |
Feb-09-10 12:43 PM |
#48 |
| -
The "hysteria" isn't Tebow or Focus on the Family |
gratuitous |
Feb-08-10 05:08 PM |
#23 |
| -
Do you believe that CBS has violated the terms and conditions of its broadcast license? |
slackmaster |
Feb-08-10 05:11 PM |
#25 |
| -
I'm not an FCC commissioner |
gratuitous |
Feb-08-10 05:32 PM |
#29 |
| -
I think that's exactly what they were scared of |
rocktivity |
Feb-09-10 08:15 AM |
#44 |
| -
i really don't think that columnist sums it up well at all. it's a shit piece from a myopic view. |
spanone |
Feb-08-10 06:59 PM |
#32 |
| -
You're right, it is shit. She should stick to sports and leave social issues alone. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Feb-09-10 12:07 AM |
#34 |
| -
Tebow hysteria? |
Mushroom |
Feb-08-10 09:07 PM |
#33 |
| -
Focus on the Family is a hate group - do you really need more? |
Hugabear |
Feb-09-10 12:11 AM |
#35 |
| -
Do you consider the Roman Catholic Church to be a hate group, Hugabear? |
slackmaster |
Feb-09-10 08:31 AM |
#46 |
| -
Do they actively campaign against homosexuals? |
Hugabear |
Feb-09-10 10:03 PM |
#53 |
| -
The article sucked. And I doubt you watch a lot more football than I do. |
fishwax |
Feb-09-10 12:33 AM |
#36 |
| -
"It's just a commercial" and "It's just a prayer" |
Jax |
Feb-09-10 12:36 AM |
#37 |
| -
Deep Breaths? |
Binka |
Feb-09-10 12:42 AM |
#38 |
| -
Harmless? It was pointless! And we have the pressure we put on them to thank. |
rocktivity |
Feb-09-10 07:56 AM |
#42 |
| -
Oh then I guess if the KKK wants to place a "Warm & Fuzzy" Superbowl Ad next year - well why not? |
LynneSin |
Feb-09-10 02:00 PM |
#50 |
| -
I'm a Lot More Oppressed Than You, and That Commercial Was Not Harmless. |
Toasterlad |
Feb-09-10 03:36 PM |
#52 |
| -
Did the commercial mention religion or morality? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Feb-10-10 12:47 AM |
#55 |
| -
The Commercial Mentioned a Link To Focus On the Families Website |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:19 AM |
#57 |
| -
I'll take that as a no. Thanks. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Feb-10-10 07:21 AM |
#58 |
| -
Well, Your Comprehension Skills Are Poor |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 08:11 AM |
#59 |
| -
Your logic needs a little work. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Feb-10-10 04:56 PM |
#60 |
| -
The public doesn't put focus on the family in the same league with the Klan |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 06:25 PM |
#61 |
| -
what kind of offensive BS is this? |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 06:33 PM |
#64 |
| -
Gay People Are Murdered By Christians In This Country Every Day. |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 06:38 PM |
#65 |
| -
Bullshit. |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 06:50 PM |
#68 |
| -
I Said Focus On the Family Was Spreading Hate, I Didn't Say They Were Directly Killing People. |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:12 PM |
#75 |
| -
Theres a difference, thats my point. |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 07:37 PM |
#82 |
| -
Yes, the Difference Is That the KKK Is Nearly Universally Despised, and Christian Hate Groups |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:40 PM |
#84 |
| -
fine then use the CCC (Concerned Citizens) in the KKK's place |
dsc |
Feb-10-10 07:23 PM |
#77 |
| -
If people like you had not made such an unreasonable uproar |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 06:51 PM |
#69 |
| -
exactly what I've been saying |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 06:55 PM |
#70 |
| -
Thanks for the reply, |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:02 PM |
#71 |
| -
the thing about the Tebow ad |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 07:08 PM |
#72 |
| -
tru dat, and on a lighter note I thought the game was |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:11 PM |
#73 |
| -
I had the Colts winning it, but it was a good game |
adoraz |
Feb-10-10 07:35 PM |
#81 |
| -
Have to root for a Manning no matter what, |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:38 PM |
#83 |
| -
Well, You Know Us Women and Gays, Always Getting Our Panties In a Twist Over Something |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:17 PM |
#76 |
| -
No, |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:25 PM |
#78 |
| -
We're Not Demonstrating Outrage At the Ad, We're Demonstrating Outrage At the Hate Group FOTF |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:43 PM |
#85 |
| -
not the message, I disagree with your method.......nite |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 09:56 PM |
#88 |
| -
By the way, what is GAYTM ? |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:34 PM |
#79 |
| -
The GAYTM Refers To the Money That Democrats Expect Gays To Hand Over Every Two Years |
Toasterlad |
Feb-10-10 07:45 PM |
#86 |
| -
Ahhh, ok, makes sense now. |
NM_hemilover |
Feb-10-10 07:54 PM |
#87 |
| -
It was a nice plug for a wingnut hate group |
Initech |
Feb-10-10 06:28 PM |
#62 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Feb-10-10 06:48 PM |
#67 |
| -
It was a lame ad that is receiving way too much attention on DU. nt |
CBR |
Feb-10-10 07:35 PM |
#80 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread