Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-30-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 23. Yes they are friendly toward Hezbollah, they aid Hamas as well |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 02:22 PM by Hippo_Tron
Hamas is a Sunni organizations so there are different points of view among their members about whether or not they should be accepting aid from Iran. Al Qaeda is an extremely militant Sunni organization who is definitely hostile to Iran and vice versa. Iran, I believe, actually provided us intelligence to help us with Afghanistan in 2001 because it was good for them to get rid of the Taliban and Al Qaeda's safe haven.
I guess your point is correct if you consider aiding groups who use suicide bombers to be the same thing as using suicide bombers. I was noting the difference in that Iran does not, itself, use suicide bombers.
Also I would add that terrorist organization is really just a label that those in power brand on resistance groups that they don't like. I don't sympathize with Hamas or Hezbollah because they're governed by a bunch of 13th century religious nutjobs. But the ANC was also named a "terrorist organization" by the Apartheid government and the rest of the world for quite some time. The Contras in Nicaragua would've been branded a terrorist organization but they were on our side.
Resistance groups or "terrorist organizations" aren't inherently good or bad and arming them isn't inherently good or bad. In the case of Hamas and Hezbollah, I don't think they are a good resistance group by any means but the United States has certainly armed equally reprehensible groups in the past.
|
| -Do think the whole "Iran is trying to get nuclear weapons to use" meme has any merit? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:39 PM |
#0 |
-
Other? I'd like to hear your opinion. I tried to be thorough in this poll |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:44 PM |
#1 |
-
Other. We don't attack nations with nuclear capability. |
aquart |
Jan-30-10 01:46 PM |
#2 |
 -
Well said and good one aquart. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:47 PM |
#4 |
 -
So your answer is "Yes". |
bananas |
Jan-30-10 02:50 PM |
#27 |
 -
"It's sheer damn luck that we have succeeded as a world in surviving...a major nuclear catastrophe" |
bananas |
Jan-30-10 03:39 PM |
#29 |
-
Should I include India in with Pakistan. I know we don't consider it as potentially "unstable" |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:47 PM |
#3 |
-
Nothing is certain, there's always some probability that they want to use them |
Hippo_Tron |
Jan-30-10 01:49 PM |
#5 |
 -
I suspect, like the elite in this country. The leaders in Iran |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:52 PM |
#7 |
-
Iran's leaders don't talk anybody into blowing themselves up (that I'm aware) |
Hippo_Tron |
Jan-30-10 01:59 PM |
#13 |
-
I meant Iran's support of terroist organizations and our own DOD's claims |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:06 PM |
#16 |
 -
They probably are mucking around in Iraq |
Hippo_Tron |
Jan-30-10 02:09 PM |
#18 |
-
We have on theirs from Iraq so yeah, why not? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:11 PM |
#21 |
-
Iran was more closely tied to Hezzbollah aren't they? I know we'd love them to be buds with AQ. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:09 PM |
#19 |
-
Yes they are friendly toward Hezbollah, they aid Hamas as well |
Hippo_Tron |
Jan-30-10 02:14 PM |
#23 |
-
To be honest, I vacillate over "Yes, they have every right"... |
Iggo |
Jan-30-10 01:50 PM |
#6 |
 -
Heard Iggo. Thanks for sharing that. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:56 PM |
#10 |
-
Iran leadership is utterly peaceful and has great civil rights and only threatens to burn |
stray cat |
Jan-30-10 01:56 PM |
#8 |
 -
So I take it you voted for one of the yes answers? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:58 PM |
#12 |
-
"to use" how? If you mean "to use" as a deterrent against attack, that's one question. |
scarletwoman |
Jan-30-10 01:56 PM |
#9 |
 -
Yeah, I realize I left that one kind of ambiguous. Sorry. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 01:59 PM |
#14 |
-
Thank you for responding so graciously. |
scarletwoman |
Jan-30-10 02:12 PM |
#22 |
-
Where is other: Lets just give them nuclear weapons because we know they love peace? |
stray cat |
Jan-30-10 01:57 PM |
#11 |
 -
Holy shit, do you get paid by the word or your adherence to the script? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:05 PM |
#15 |
-
Ok. I suck at polls. Sorry everyone. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:07 PM |
#17 |
 -
Oh dear! Don't be so hard on yourself! |
scarletwoman |
Jan-30-10 02:23 PM |
#25 |
-
Continuye what we're doing and let them have them and take the chance. |
timeforpeace |
Jan-30-10 02:10 PM |
#20 |
 -
Well if we've learned nothing, and we probably haven't |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 02:17 PM |
#24 |
-
Not sure what that has to do with letting them have nukes and taking that chance. |
timeforpeace |
Jan-30-10 02:34 PM |
#26 |
-
I meant in the event we decided to tussle with Iran. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 03:51 PM |
#30 |
-
I'll try again. You agree we should let them have nukes and take the chance? |
timeforpeace |
Jan-30-10 08:58 PM |
#35 |
-
I voted for choice number four. |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 09:21 PM |
#36 |
-
no matter the cost--we must stop the Achaemanid Empire from expanding |
madrchsod |
Jan-30-10 03:23 PM |
#28 |
 -
They've been invading other countries lately? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 03:54 PM |
#31 |
-
Negative recs for what I think is a pretty balanced poll compared to some here? |
shadowknows69 |
Jan-30-10 03:56 PM |
#32 |
-
I ask this of anyone who froths at the mouth about Iran |
KonaKane |
Jan-30-10 04:08 PM |
#33 |
-
Other: it doesn't matter a whit. |
Robb |
Jan-30-10 04:09 PM |
#34 |