You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #129: And yet you still didn't get it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #125
129. And yet you still didn't get it.
1. This is not a tabloid accusation, let alone an "every tabloid accusation" kind of revelation. This isn't like bat-boy or Dick Cheney is a robot. This isn't John Edwards had a six-course endangered lobster dinner after visiting a homeless shelter or he gets really expensive haircuts. This is a highly-paid professional who was closer to John Edwards than Edward's own wife who has a sex tape of JE (clearly visible) with a visibly pregnant woman wearing jewelry like RH at the time that RH was visibly pregnant. He's not making this revalation in the back pages of Star magazine, he's speaking to and being picked up by every major news venue in the country.

2. Hunter could only profit by suing the shit out of Young if there was no tape. There's no downside for her in suing over a tape if it didn't exist, and she definitely seems to be looking for the money.

3. If Young's allegations were false, the financial gains, damage control and potential sympathy points Edwards could gain would far outweigh any negatives entailed by slapping Young with a suit. It would be a simple and easy matter - IF . . IF - the allegations were false.

4. Neither JE nor Hunter has denied the existence of the tape.


Occam's razor fairly demands that the highest probability is that there is indeed a tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC