You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: This was a political event and the justices are not suppose to be involved [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. This was a political event and the justices are not suppose to be involved
mouthing "not true" is a terrible breach of the idea that justices are above partisan politics. He confirmed that the right wing 5 are not above such matters. Plus he showed an appalling lack of self control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -A very good article on Judge Alito's shameful display at last night SOTUS NJmaverick  Jan-28-10 10:39 AM   #0 
  - So true  waiting   Jan-28-10 10:45 AM   #1 
  - In the interest of justice "Scalito" should resign  Robyn66   Jan-28-10 10:50 AM   #2 
  - At the very least . . .  Krashkopf   Jan-29-10 07:09 AM   #60 
  - Sorry I don't get it.  newtothegame   Jan-28-10 10:52 AM   #3 
  - This was a political event and the justices are not suppose to be involved  NJmaverick   Jan-28-10 10:54 AM   #5 
  - Really? I mean I know they're supposed to be above politics.  newtothegame   Jan-28-10 10:57 AM   #7 
  - Yes, really  DeschutesRiver   Jan-28-10 11:03 AM   #11 
  - I am pretty sure if you did that in his court while he was speaking...  tk2kewl   Jan-28-10 02:58 PM   #26 
  - It wasn't just a head nod  Mojorabbit   Jan-29-10 01:13 AM   #50 
  - Please. It was more than a nod. It was a clear expression of disagreement with the presidents words.  geckosfeet   Jan-29-10 05:33 AM   #57 
  - Ok? This is still a democracy folks. He's allowed to do that.  newtothegame   Jan-29-10 08:34 AM   #71 
     - The President had the floor. He didn't. As with Joe Wilson, he needs to suck it up during the  yellowcanine   Jan-29-10 09:31 AM   #74 
     - Right, and they'd be idiots too.  newtothegame   Jan-29-10 09:47 AM   #78 
        - One person mutters under their breath and soon people are yelling "You Lie!"  yellowcanine   Jan-29-10 10:00 AM   #82 
           - Especially,  NOLALady   Jan-29-10 10:56 AM   #90 
     - he's not feeling any legal consequences of his actions, merely social blow-back...  LanternWaste   Jan-29-10 10:08 AM   #85 
  - Why are you minimalizing this  lark   Jan-29-10 10:00 AM   #83 
  - But this wasn't a generic partisan question  Recursion   Jan-28-10 09:31 PM   #33 
  - Supreme Court Justices really are supposed to be above having hurt  JDPriestly   Jan-29-10 12:41 AM   #47 
     - I don't see anything improper about Obama's comment or Alito's reaction  Recursion   Jan-29-10 07:25 AM   #63 
        - I see - you don't have a problem with open bias on the Supreme Court.  RaleighNCDUer   Jan-29-10 08:57 AM   #72 
           - WTF do you mean "bias"?  Recursion   Jan-29-10 10:54 AM   #89 
  - What audience do you think Alito was playing to?  cherokeeprogressive   Jan-30-10 12:41 AM   #96 
  - I wasn't close enough to hear if he said anything out loud  gratuitous   Jan-28-10 10:57 AM   #8 
  - Slightly?? Head "nod"? Hardly.  Bluebear   Jan-28-10 11:57 AM   #18 
  - it was more than a head nod  CreekDog   Jan-28-10 12:22 PM   #20 
  - CAMERAS  omega minimo   Jan-28-10 11:52 PM   #42 
  - .  omega minimo   Jan-28-10 11:53 PM   #43 
  - I can't stand the guy, but I think this is blown way the fuck out of  liquid diamond   Jan-29-10 12:13 AM   #46 
  - Agreed  Sherman A1   Jan-29-10 05:54 AM   #58 
  - No. He shook his head, looked straight at Obama and mouthed  Gman   Jan-29-10 07:52 AM   #66 
  - Didn't know the President was that off limits?  newtothegame   Jan-29-10 08:22 AM   #70 
     - Well, maybe something like going on 250 years of protocol and honor  Gman   Jan-29-10 02:00 PM   #93 
  - If it had been Breyer doing that to Bush, the reaction here would be different.  dem629   Jan-29-10 09:53 AM   #81 
  - I wish Justice Ginsberg had stood up and given the universal sign for "Up Yours" before  FSogol   Jan-28-10 10:54 AM   #4 
  - Very good article that makes a lot of sense.  AlinPA   Jan-28-10 10:55 AM   #6 
  - While I don't like all of the effects  ncguy   Jan-28-10 10:59 AM   #9 
  - The right wing five's new law declaring Corporations super citizens  NJmaverick   Jan-28-10 11:02 AM   #10 
  - Agreed. It's not only 'not right' but scary...imho. nt  snappyturtle   Jan-28-10 11:15 AM   #15 
  - The operative words  The Wizard   Jan-29-10 07:19 AM   #62 
  - A corporation is not a public interest group -  RaleighNCDUer   Jan-28-10 11:55 AM   #17 
  - Wow. Well said.  catbyte   Jan-28-10 12:54 PM   #21 
  - The NRA, and the SIERRA club are corporations  ncguy   Jan-28-10 02:18 PM   #25 
  - Corporations can put virtually unlimited money into astroturf organizations  RaleighNCDUer   Jan-30-10 12:14 AM   #94 
  - Wish I could K&R your post.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-28-10 07:26 PM   #32 
  - And if corporations are people  colorado_ufo   Jan-29-10 02:43 AM   #51 
  - What part of Corporations are people in your mind?  lunatica   Jan-28-10 06:30 PM   #28 
  - When you say it was the "right ruling" you seem to be indicating that you know what the founders  rhett o rick   Jan-28-10 11:11 PM   #41 
  - I don't have to know what the founders thought, I know what they agreed on.  ncguy   Jan-29-10 08:17 AM   #69 
     - I disagree. Corporations differ from groups and unions in that they are given special privileges to  rhett o rick   Jan-29-10 11:05 AM   #91 
     - You need to learn what the founders thought of corporations.  beardown   Jan-30-10 11:57 PM   #98 
  - What labor unions might raise for this would be far outweighed by corporations.  LiberalFighter   Jan-29-10 12:06 AM   #45 
  - That right-wing groups can raise $35 at a time is not the problem,  JDPriestly   Jan-29-10 12:44 AM   #49 
  - In a somewhat perverse way  PRETZEL   Jan-28-10 11:08 AM   #12 
  - I thought he mought "that's not true"  NJmaverick   Jan-28-10 01:16 PM   #22 
  - What's the email to get to the supreme court  Bitwit1234   Jan-28-10 11:08 AM   #13 
  - Nothing is as it has been  Guilded Lilly   Jan-28-10 11:12 AM   #14 
  - Last time you had a republican congressman calling our President a liar  NJmaverick   Jan-28-10 11:23 AM   #16 
     - Yup...  Guilded Lilly   Jan-28-10 12:19 PM   #19 
  - the fascist gang of 5 on the SCOTUS have intentionally made themselves  branders seine   Jan-28-10 01:20 PM   #23 
  - and here most of us thought the Iraq war was bush's most damaging move  NJmaverick   Jan-28-10 01:51 PM   #24 
  - Knowing it would lead to this kind of court was exactly why many of us were  BrklynLiberal   Jan-28-10 07:23 PM   #31 
     - Absolutely  Art_from_Ark   Jan-28-10 11:08 PM   #40 
  - i don't see how that conclusion can be avoided.  tomp   Jan-28-10 10:49 PM   #36 
  - K&R!  BrklynLiberal   Jan-28-10 06:21 PM   #27 
  - The Fascist Five deserve zero respect from me  concerned1   Jan-28-10 06:37 PM   #29 
  - This conclusion by Greenwald makes it all the more disgusting that Senators like Schumer, not only  BrklynLiberal   Jan-28-10 07:19 PM   #30 
  - i'm with you on shumer. my senator is a piece of crap. nt  tomp   Jan-28-10 10:50 PM   #37 
  - Agree re Schumer . . . was he ever liberal or just pretending ? Big disappointment!  defendandprotect   Jan-28-10 10:53 PM   #38 
  - Thanks for posting that, NJMaverick. Rec.  bertman   Jan-28-10 09:38 PM   #34 
  - Agree . . temperment more suited for dictatorships . .. !!  defendandprotect   Jan-28-10 10:46 PM   #35 
  - What about the female judge sitting on the end?  deek   Jan-28-10 11:05 PM   #39 
  - K&R! Thanks for posting n/t  Turborama   Jan-28-10 11:58 PM   #44 
  - Alito is like Scalia, without the brains and self restraint.  TexasObserver   Jan-29-10 12:43 AM   #48 
  - IMO, this ruling is the worse since Bush v. Gore....  Lindsey   Jan-29-10 03:10 AM   #52 
  - Founding Father - Author of the Constitution  DearAbby   Jan-29-10 03:32 AM   #53 
  - Awesome quote.  TexasObserver   Jan-29-10 04:03 AM   #56 
  - Indeed an awesome quote, but...  wizstars   Jan-29-10 09:07 AM   #73 
  - As much as I hate the guy and what he's done I think the article is overreacting a bit. NT  NoFace   Jan-29-10 03:41 AM   #54 
  - New here...how long have you been looking  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 09:50 AM   #80 
  - Excellent  malaise   Jan-29-10 03:54 AM   #55 
  - This is bullshit  austin78704   Jan-29-10 06:49 AM   #59 
  - Real issue is the Alito has made his politics known  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 09:48 AM   #79 
     - Alito made his politics known in more substantive ways already  austin78704   Jan-30-10 11:06 PM   #97 
  - alito reacted because obama lied  ChucktownMillie   Jan-29-10 07:12 AM   #61 
  - Another Republican....gee they are popping like little gophers.  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 09:46 AM   #77 
  - Normally I'd welcome you to DU, seeing your low post count...  brendan120678   Jan-29-10 10:22 AM   #87 
  - doesn't prevent subsidiaries of foreign corps on American soil  jeanmarc   Jan-29-10 10:31 AM   #88 
  - The American  Vermontgrown   Jan-29-10 07:27 AM   #64 
  - You are a repubilican, eh?  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 09:44 AM   #76 
  - I would have preferred the President to have addressed his displeasure  BennyD   Jan-29-10 07:38 AM   #65 
  - When your house is burning  Scruffy1   Jan-29-10 07:58 AM   #67 
  - You sound like a Republican and a  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 09:42 AM   #75 
  - Thankfully you still have 2 cents  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 10:09 AM   #86 
  - He was a Bush appointee  anachro1   Jan-29-10 08:14 AM   #68 
  - we all know that Alito is a Bush appointee  riverbendviewgal   Jan-29-10 10:06 AM   #84 
     - Bush supporter?  anachro1   Jan-29-10 11:20 AM   #92 
  - "Verbal outburst"?  woo me with science   Jan-30-10 12:36 AM   #95 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC