Joanne98
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| -“60 Votes” — It Was Always Bullshit - Jane Hamsher/FDL |
WillyT |
Jan-25-10 02:06 PM |
#0 |
 -
K&R |
leftstreet |
Jan-25-10 02:07 PM |
#1 |
| -
"It was always bullshit" |
NJmaverick |
Jan-25-10 02:08 PM |
#2 |
 -
+1 |
azmouse |
Jan-25-10 02:09 PM |
#4 |
| -
Your logic is almost irresistible. |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-25-10 02:09 PM |
#5 |
| -
+10 |
Fire1 |
Jan-25-10 02:23 PM |
#9 |
| -
Then why don't you start a blog that gets over a million hits a day? |
Missy Vixen |
Jan-25-10 02:37 PM |
#14 |
| -
Free Republic gets a million hits a day, doesn't make any of the posts over there |
NJmaverick |
Jan-25-10 02:39 PM |
#16 |
 -
Again. You can't aspire to that standard, can you? |
Missy Vixen |
Jan-25-10 02:42 PM |
#17 |
| -
First off you are playing as fast and loose with the facts as Jane does |
NJmaverick |
Jan-25-10 03:07 PM |
#21 |
| -
Oh, my GOD. I got the visitors' count wrong! |
Missy Vixen |
Jan-25-10 03:15 PM |
#27 |
| -
You can't laugh off a factor of 100 |
NJmaverick |
Jan-25-10 03:19 PM |
#28 |
| -
I believe you are reporting on FDL's traffic rank not "hits a day". |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 05:32 PM |
#36 |
| -
*SNORT* Alexa? SERIOUSLY? |
Occulus |
Jan-25-10 06:14 PM |
#40 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-25-10 03:13 PM |
#25 |
| -
That was fucking nasty and mean |
Generator |
Jan-25-10 06:24 PM |
#43 |
| -
"nasty and mean", and incredibly ignorant and defamatory. |
inna |
Jan-25-10 07:02 PM |
#58 |
| -
How has she "sold out" to Norquist and the teabaggers? |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 06:40 PM |
#47 |
| -
I feel very sorry for you. nt |
rudy23 |
Jan-25-10 06:46 PM |
#53 |
| -
DLCers hate Hamsher b/c she speaks the truth; not DLC memes n/t |
amborin |
Jan-25-10 04:58 PM |
#34 |
| -
They can't speak outside of DLC memes. You won't see one anti-Jane statement you won't see 50 times |
rudy23 |
Jan-25-10 06:42 PM |
#50 |
| -
yes, exactly, lots |
amborin |
Jan-25-10 08:48 PM |
#65 |
| -
Rahmbucks! |
dflprincess |
Jan-25-10 09:54 PM |
#69 |
| -
Please do! nt |
rudy23 |
Jan-26-10 09:22 AM |
#76 |
| -
Until she writes something nice about Obama. |
donco6 |
Jan-25-10 06:40 PM |
#46 |
| -
-1,000 |
inna |
Jan-25-10 06:59 PM |
#57 |
| -
Do you have something of value to say, like maybe |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-26-10 05:49 AM |
#74 |
| -
Yep. n/t |
Bolo Boffin |
Jan-25-10 02:09 PM |
#3 |
| -
love your avatar. |
inna |
Jan-25-10 09:40 PM |
#67 |
| -
Yeah. |
Joanne98 |
Jan-25-10 02:17 PM |
#6 |
| -
Just like "we've gotta pass the Senate Bill to get reconciliation" is the latest BS |
leveymg |
Jan-25-10 02:19 PM |
#7 |
| -
Different reconciliation |
bain_sidhe |
Jan-25-10 03:22 PM |
#29 |
| -
Look it up. That's reconciliation. |
leveymg |
Jan-25-10 04:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
I have already explained it to you once |
bain_sidhe |
Jan-25-10 04:55 PM |
#33 |
| -
Budget items are what the VP's Instruction says are budget items - you haven't disproven that |
leveymg |
Jan-25-10 06:07 PM |
#39 |
| -
They would defer to the Senate parliamentarian to determine if the Byrd Rule |
tritsofme |
Jan-25-10 07:32 PM |
#64 |
| -
Why defer to the Parliamentarian? Only if the other side has 60 votes to support an objection. |
leveymg |
Jan-26-10 05:41 AM |
#73 |
| -
Jane's serving Norquist's agenda quite well. K&U |
berni_mccoy |
Jan-25-10 02:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
Obama and Rahm are serving Norquist and the Corporate interests |
Larkspur |
Jan-25-10 02:24 PM |
#10 |
| -
LMFAO! |
berni_mccoy |
Jan-25-10 02:27 PM |
#11 |
| -
Sounds like Obama is working FOR him. And Jack Abramoff. |
Dr.Phool |
Jan-25-10 02:33 PM |
#12 |
| -
Oops Double post.. |
Dr.Phool |
Jan-25-10 02:36 PM |
#13 |
| -
It doesn't hurt. I tdoesn't make it true either. |
WonderGrunion |
Jan-25-10 03:14 PM |
#26 |
| -
Bingo. nt |
Lorien |
Jan-25-10 05:34 PM |
#37 |
| -
Jane's trying to point out the truth |
Missy Vixen |
Jan-25-10 02:38 PM |
#15 |
| -
Anybody who associates with treasonous folk like /norquist don't deserve to be heard. |
live love laugh |
Jan-25-10 06:24 PM |
#44 |
| -
Oh yeah, because you can't have POPULIST bipartisanship, only CORPORATE bipartisanship. |
rudy23 |
Jan-25-10 06:45 PM |
#51 |
| -
Then you will have to shut these liberals out, too. |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 06:56 PM |
#56 |
| -
Who the fuck left you in charge.. |
DisgustedInMN |
Jan-26-10 07:54 AM |
#75 |
| -
Uhhhhh OK. Stress much? nt |
live love laugh |
Jan-26-10 12:29 PM |
#78 |
| -
Can you explain, specifically, how pushing the Public Option is "serving Norquist's agenda"? |
jgraz |
Jan-25-10 04:14 PM |
#31 |
| -
* cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * cricket noise * |
jgraz |
Jan-25-10 05:00 PM |
#35 |
| -
Whereas Obama is cool with a bipartisan panel to evaluate "entitlements" and some say nothing |
JVS |
Jan-25-10 06:41 PM |
#49 |
| -
And just what is Norquist's agenda that Jane is serving? |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 06:41 PM |
#48 |
| -
They have no idea. It's a talking point, they know nothing past that. |
rudy23 |
Jan-25-10 06:46 PM |
#52 |
| -
Yep. It is pathetic the amount of energy that is expended towards |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 07:06 PM |
#60 |
| -
As others have asked please explain - also Hamsher on signing the letter with Norquist... |
slipslidingaway |
Jan-25-10 06:47 PM |
#54 |
| -
yet Obama and his admin seem to Embrace the economics Norquist Espouses |
fascisthunter |
Jan-25-10 07:03 PM |
#59 |
| -
what an ignorant and idiotic comment. |
inna |
Jan-25-10 09:42 PM |
#68 |
| -
Crickets!!!!!! n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Jan-26-10 06:18 PM |
#82 |
| -
Are the lies that this Hamsher character tell made out of ignorance or malice? |
tritsofme |
Jan-25-10 02:46 PM |
#18 |
| -
both |
NJmaverick |
Jan-25-10 03:09 PM |
#23 |
| -
The bill in it's current form is a nightmare that the non-elite can't afford. nt |
Lorien |
Jan-25-10 05:36 PM |
#38 |
| -
Well I think your assessment is garbage. |
tritsofme |
Jan-25-10 06:20 PM |
#41 |
| -
It takes 51 votes. It has always taken 51 votes to pass a bill in the Senate. |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 06:49 PM |
#55 |
| -
Bush needed to make his tax cuts sunset because they were passed through reconciliation. |
tritsofme |
Jan-25-10 07:12 PM |
#61 |
| -
Nope. Tax cuts sunsets to avoid the Byrd rule by staying within PAYGO restrictions. |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-25-10 07:29 PM |
#63 |
| -
K&R |
peace frog |
Jan-25-10 02:58 PM |
#19 |
| -
kick |
valerief |
Jan-25-10 03:01 PM |
#20 |
| -
Hey, what do you know? The chess brigade was right! |
Marr |
Jan-25-10 03:08 PM |
#22 |
| -
Democrats had 60 votes, liberals did not. |
WonderGrunion |
Jan-25-10 03:11 PM |
#24 |
| -
lol... like in Massachusetts right? |
fascisthunter |
Jan-25-10 07:13 PM |
#62 |
| -
You enjoyed saying that part about "the fewer votes THEY will have." didn't you Grunion? |
bertman |
Jan-25-10 10:27 PM |
#70 |
| -
In fact... |
blindpig |
Jan-25-10 03:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
Jane Hamsher |
howaboutme |
Jan-25-10 06:23 PM |
#42 |
| -
knr - also signed the petition at the bottom of the link n/t |
slipslidingaway |
Jan-25-10 06:38 PM |
#45 |
| -
K & R |
democracy1st |
Jan-25-10 08:56 PM |
#66 |
| -
I'm with Jane on this. Petition signed. Rec. nt |
bertman |
Jan-25-10 10:28 PM |
#71 |
| -
K&R for Jane and Firedoglake. |
bvar22 |
Jan-25-10 11:09 PM |
#72 |
| -
K & R |
Ganja Ninja |
Jan-26-10 09:26 AM |
#77 |
| -
The 'This or Nothing' BS claim |
GinaMaria |
Jan-26-10 01:04 PM |
#79 |
| -
Jane is Right - Three Cheers for Her and a Big Kilo Romeo |
swilton |
Jan-26-10 01:23 PM |
#80 |
| -
They have hammered the 60 votes thing so much that |
Politicub |
Jan-26-10 01:30 PM |
#81 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread