You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: So, let's fight back with our own definition. We are the people. /nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So, let's fight back with our own definition. We are the people. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Can we define personhood? Festivito  Jan-25-10 06:33 AM   #0 
  - no, we can't because the Supreme Court already did that for the American people.  secondwind   Jan-25-10 06:34 AM   #1 
  - So, let's fight back with our own definition. We are the people. /nt  Festivito   Jan-25-10 06:47 AM   #2 
  - In a 5/4 decision.  reformist   Jan-25-10 09:38 AM   #6 
  - Don't forget the fertilized eggs...  kirby   Jan-25-10 09:30 AM   #3 
  - Yes, that would be interesting. Something in the expression though.  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:27 AM   #11 
  - Any such move would inevitably turn into an argument about abortion  slackmaster   Jan-25-10 09:33 AM   #4 
  - Think that can be handled. /nt  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:29 AM   #13 
  - To be a person you must have unique DNA  undeterred   Jan-25-10 09:34 AM   #5 
  - Interesting. I think it will need good words. /nt  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:28 AM   #12 
  - Legally, the only responsibility of a corporation is to make money for its shareholders.  Hosnon   Jan-25-10 09:48 AM   #7 
  - Yes, humans have a natural expiration, corporations do not.  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:34 AM   #14 
     - I think we should tread lightly though. I think we can all agree that, as DUers, we appreciate  Hosnon   Jan-25-10 12:42 PM   #17 
  - All we need is a reversal of the previous decision, and  reformist   Jan-25-10 10:30 AM   #8 
  - They might be moving quickly thinking there might be a retirement.  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:21 AM   #9 
  - Someone we could put in jail if they break the law...  kentuck   Jan-25-10 11:22 AM   #10 
  - Corprations also do not fear incarceration.  Festivito   Jan-25-10 11:41 AM   #15 
  - It shouldn't be hard to sidestep abortion  caraher   Jan-25-10 11:43 AM   #16 
  - Don't forget about our sexual accouterments!  RedCloud   Jan-25-10 12:54 PM   #18 
  - Good question.  Cetacea   Jan-25-10 12:59 PM   #19 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC