You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #69: actually, you support religious oppression [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. actually, you support religious oppression
but that much has been made clear

hth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How do you feel about vouchers for public schools only? bluestateguy  Jan-24-10 03:47 PM   #0 
  - We already have that here in Colorado.  donco6   Jan-24-10 03:54 PM   #1 
  - You shouldn't need a voucher, and people should never be excluded from public schools  noamnety   Jan-24-10 04:00 PM   #2 
  - What noamnety said....  Grey   Jan-24-10 04:22 PM   #5 
  - My grandson goes to a kindergarten in the Glendale public school system even tho he lives in North  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 04:37 PM   #9 
  - We offer lots of public choices in my district  donco6   Jan-24-10 04:56 PM   #21 
  - Wow, that is great. Encourage them to do language immersion, tho. It benefits the brain  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 05:27 PM   #26 
     - Our parents don't want it.  donco6   Jan-24-10 05:49 PM   #32 
        - Aww, that's too bad. I know my family had some dissenting voices about a 5 year old  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 05:58 PM   #36 
           - We're too small to pull it off.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:10 PM   #44 
              - This is hard for a non-urban school even to consider.  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:18 PM   #52 
                 - That is a shame. Italian seems like a fun language  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:20 PM   #53 
                    - I'm hoping my grandson will go on to a career in Europe. I know that's funny but I do.  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:25 PM   #59 
                       - Being bilingual always opens doors.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:28 PM   #62 
                          - My own family members had reservations on this! They thought it was too tough on a little kid  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:35 PM   #66 
                             - Europeans have been doing it for decades, at least.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:38 PM   #71 
                                - Don't get me started...nt  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:45 PM   #76 
  - How can they get away with not serving sped kids?  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 04:59 PM   #24 
     - Out of district, I think. I don't know all the fine print but that was what I gleaned from what my  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 05:31 PM   #27 
        - That's really not legal  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:01 PM   #38 
           - I'll check it out further but I remember my daughter being pretty obstinate about it.. nt  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:06 PM   #40 
           - Oh I believe you  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:12 PM   #47 
           - They do the same thing here in CO.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:11 PM   #46 
              - That's different from what was described  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:13 PM   #48 
                 - No, not all IEP kids, just out of district kids. Sorry if I was misunderstood.  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:20 PM   #54 
                    - So kids from out of district who are on IEPs can't enroll?  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:42 PM   #74 
                       - That is my understanding. My daughter told me it was pretty clear.  CTyankee   Jan-24-10 06:55 PM   #79 
                       - Magnet school aren't required to take IEP students are they? n/t  FLDCVADem   Jan-24-10 08:13 PM   #90 
                       - Here in my state they are  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 08:45 PM   #91 
                       - Yep. As a parent of a child with an IEP, I'd be throwing a hissy fit heard round the world.  Pithlet   Jan-26-10 05:00 PM   #101 
  - It's funny you mention Detroit (are you from here?)  Romulox   Jan-26-10 10:20 AM   #94 
  - Really good post!  Sans Culottes   Jan-26-10 04:50 PM   #99 
  - No one has convinced my that any vouchers are really necessary.  KittyWampus   Jan-24-10 04:10 PM   #3 
  - We already have that here, it's called open enrollment. No voucher needed.  madmom   Jan-24-10 04:15 PM   #4 
  - i am for vouchers for any parents that want them  paulsby   Jan-24-10 04:23 PM   #6 
  - I don't agree with vouchers for private schools.  noamnety   Jan-24-10 04:35 PM   #7 
  - i accept that i am in the minority here, in my position on vouchers  paulsby   Jan-24-10 04:39 PM   #11 
  - Yes.  aquart   Jan-24-10 04:46 PM   #14 
  - I would oppose them for religious schools.  donco6   Jan-24-10 04:37 PM   #8 
  - that's exactly the problem  paulsby   Jan-24-10 04:43 PM   #12 
     - The money isn't actually there "for the child"  noamnety   Jan-24-10 04:50 PM   #16 
     - what i mean is that the money  paulsby   Jan-24-10 04:55 PM   #20 
        - It does NOT benefit me for a child to be indoctrinated in (some) religions  donco6   Jan-24-10 04:57 PM   #22 
           - again, i am speaking in the aggregate  paulsby   Jan-24-10 05:45 PM   #29 
              - Now you're getting confused.  donco6   Jan-24-10 05:48 PM   #31 
                 - except the state is NOT supporting religious schools  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:00 PM   #37 
                    - Parents are free to choose whatever they want, yes.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:07 PM   #41 
                    - the fact is this  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:11 PM   #45 
                       - No.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:14 PM   #49 
                          - so what  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:24 PM   #58 
                             - Never.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:25 PM   #60 
                             - again, i understand that you want to limit liberty and choice  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:34 PM   #65 
                                - And I understand that you support state-funded religious oppression.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:35 PM   #67 
                                   - actually, you support religious oppression  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:37 PM   #69 
                                      - It's not religious "oppression" to prohibit tax dollars going to churches.  noamnety   Jan-26-10 10:17 AM   #93 
                                         - it most definitely IS  paulsby   Jan-26-10 04:43 PM   #98 
                                         - No, sorry - refusing to fund nongovernment organizations of ANY sort  noamnety   Jan-26-10 05:00 PM   #100 
                                         - bigotry is saying it's ok for NONreligious org's  paulsby   Jan-26-10 07:13 PM   #102 
                             - You perform a service and EARN your paycheck  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:50 PM   #78 
                                - the argument i am responding to doesn't work either.  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:55 PM   #80 
                                   - You're still not getting it  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 07:10 PM   #84 
                                      - YOU still don't get  paulsby   Jan-26-10 04:41 PM   #97 
                    - Replace the word "support" with "fund"  noamnety   Jan-24-10 06:20 PM   #55 
                    - Good point, and I hate that, too.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:21 PM   #56 
                    - But you actually get your paycheck  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:46 PM   #77 
                    - This is a nice conversation in the abstract, but the reality of school choice is that there  Book Lover   Jan-24-10 07:00 PM   #83 
     - No.  donco6   Jan-24-10 04:51 PM   #17 
     - i am well aware that this argument has lost before in courts  paulsby   Jan-24-10 05:43 PM   #28 
        - No, sorry, you have a losing argument.  donco6   Jan-24-10 05:47 PM   #30 
           - you have a losing strawman  paulsby   Jan-24-10 05:49 PM   #33 
              - It was a good decision.  donco6   Jan-24-10 05:50 PM   #34 
                 - i can't try jackshit  paulsby   Jan-24-10 05:57 PM   #35 
     - Your belief is built on a bogus premise. nt  DURHAM D   Jan-24-10 04:55 PM   #19 
  - No.  aquart   Jan-24-10 04:47 PM   #15 
  - Parents do have the choice  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 05:00 PM   #25 
     - and imo  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:01 PM   #39 
        - It's not that simple  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:10 PM   #43 
           - i agree  paulsby   Jan-24-10 06:17 PM   #51 
              - I have been advocating looking at public education in the same light as public safety for years  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:36 PM   #68 
                 - first paragraph i agree with  paulsby   Jan-24-10 07:12 PM   #85 
                    - There is an exception for school services I bet you didn't think about  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 07:45 PM   #88 
                       - i can agree with that nt  paulsby   Jan-26-10 04:37 PM   #96 
  - A very similar program already exists  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 04:38 PM   #10 
  - allowed to go to another school "in their district"  noamnety   Jan-24-10 04:43 PM   #13 
     - Under RTTT, states are having to change that.  donco6   Jan-24-10 04:53 PM   #18 
     - Some states have open enrollment  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 04:57 PM   #23 
  - So the failing school loses students and fails MORE? No.  Bluebear   Jan-24-10 06:08 PM   #42 
  - Stop making sense, dammit.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:15 PM   #50 
  - Bingo  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:38 PM   #70 
  - How would the kids get to school?  rucky   Jan-24-10 06:23 PM   #57 
  - If they can't figure it out, they should be there.  donco6   Jan-24-10 06:26 PM   #61 
  - Or the poor that do not have any means of transportation.  demmiblue   Jan-24-10 06:29 PM   #63 
  - Or the kids whose parents have no transportation  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:39 PM   #72 
  - Unnecessary.  LWolf   Jan-24-10 06:31 PM   #64 
  - I'm going to go out on a limb here  proud2BlibKansan   Jan-24-10 06:40 PM   #73 
  - You don't have to go that far, lol.  LWolf   Jan-24-10 06:58 PM   #82 
  - Although I agree with most of what you have said, this would become...  demmiblue   Jan-24-10 06:44 PM   #75 
  - Costly? You bet. That's why it doesn't already happen.  LWolf   Jan-24-10 06:58 PM   #81 
     - That's definitely a start.  donco6   Jan-24-10 07:29 PM   #86 
        - Yes.  LWolf   Jan-24-10 08:07 PM   #89 
  - This quickly leads to situations in which children can't attend schools  Romulox   Jan-26-10 10:23 AM   #95 
  - Or... we could just fund education properly  jgraz   Jan-24-10 07:32 PM   #87 
  - Here in Jersey, kids are only allowed to go to their local/closest school  Broke In Jersey   Jan-25-10 07:20 AM   #92 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC