You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: genius.sheer genius. you have a rebellious anarchical streak, stinky.I love that in you. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. genius.sheer genius. you have a rebellious anarchical streak, stinky.I love that in you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -We need three unmarried volunteers to challenge the Supremes' dreadful decision Stinky The Clown  Jan-21-10 08:22 PM   #0 
  - Actually this is a good idea.  Ozymanithrax   Jan-21-10 08:25 PM   #1 
  - That is the serious underpinning of my OP  Stinky The Clown   Jan-21-10 08:27 PM   #4 
  - genius.sheer genius. you have a rebellious anarchical streak, stinky.I love that in you.  roguevalley   Jan-21-10 08:32 PM   #9 
  - genius.sheer genius. you have a rebellious anarchical streak, stinky.I love that in you.  roguevalley   Jan-21-10 08:32 PM   #10 
  - How about bringing Murder Charges?  Blue State Bandit   Jan-22-10 03:10 PM   #74 
     - Murder?  rambler_american   Jan-22-10 03:32 PM   #81 
     - +1  Mithreal   Jan-22-10 04:15 PM   #87 
     - I love it!!!  Rainbowreflect   Jan-22-10 04:29 PM   #91 
     - I would do that. The "Corpo Person", all employees and...  JanMichael   Jan-22-10 10:31 PM   #120 
  - Why not simply argue that owning your own corporation is equivalent to Slavery  Gorobei   Jan-22-10 02:41 PM   #69 
     - Yeah! Shareholders are slave owners.  tblue   Jan-22-10 04:24 PM   #90 
  - A crazy great idea.  rurallib   Jan-21-10 08:26 PM   #2 
  - I like it. But it will be shot down as "Gay Agenda." n/t  Betsy Ross   Jan-21-10 08:26 PM   #3 
  - and that damages the plan in what way?  teknomanzer   Jan-21-10 08:48 PM   #14 
  - Isn't This The Part Where The Old Scientists Says...  Yavin4   Jan-21-10 08:28 PM   #5 
  - Huh. I like it.  Maru Kitteh   Jan-21-10 08:28 PM   #6 
  - I'm single but I'd probably need to see your corporation first.  EFerrari   Jan-21-10 08:30 PM   #7 
  - Heh .....  Stinky The Clown   Jan-21-10 08:46 PM   #12 
  - She's got a really good personality..  Demoiselle   Jan-21-10 08:47 PM   #13 
  - It would be fun to write the ad for craigslist.  EFerrari   Jan-21-10 08:53 PM   # 
  - I'd marry your corporation, Beth!  intheflow   Jan-22-10 11:48 AM   #48 
     - LOL!  EFerrari   Jan-22-10 12:25 PM   #54 
  - Hmm... interesting.  drm604   Jan-21-10 08:31 PM   #8 
  - I'd do it in a heartbeat. But we'd need a good, earthshaking law team.  demodonkey   Jan-21-10 08:43 PM   #11 
  - I like the way you think :)  varelse   Jan-21-10 08:49 PM   #15 
  - I'm a single male.  drm604   Jan-21-10 08:51 PM   #16 
  - How about you and me form a corporation...  undeterred   Jan-21-10 08:53 PM   #18 
  - Okay, there's a legal brief with the word "threesome" and something that  gkhouston   Jan-21-10 08:57 PM   #22 
  - Add a coke can and public hair  LiberalFighter   Jan-22-10 07:12 PM   #113 
  - LOL  EFerrari   Jan-21-10 09:27 PM   #34 
     - That's the only reason I'd do it!  undeterred   Jan-21-10 09:40 PM   #38 
  - you'd have to send them a picture of your portfolio.  gkhouston   Jan-21-10 08:55 PM   #20 
     - Until this instant I never once  HillWilliam   Jan-22-10 03:46 PM   #84 
  - I would think you could take an already married couple, who form  pdxmom   Jan-21-10 08:52 PM   #17 
  - That's good  Stinky The Clown   Jan-21-10 08:58 PM   #25 
  - Better yet,  drm604   Jan-21-10 09:14 PM   #28 
  - Hey, I Like That!  On the Road   Jan-21-10 09:17 PM   #30 
  - Isn't that already called a merger?  Fla Dem   Jan-22-10 03:32 PM   #80 
  - can my husband and i marry my adult daughter?  mopinko   Jan-21-10 09:18 PM   #31 
     - You and your husband are now a corporation..and can insure whomever  pdxmom   Jan-21-10 09:52 PM   #39 
  - I got one thing to say to that idea  groundloop   Jan-21-10 08:54 PM   #19 
  - sounds good but the courts would just refuse to take the case  marlakay   Jan-21-10 08:56 PM   #21 
  - You're right of course but, as you say, Stinky is on the right path here.  drm604   Jan-21-10 09:18 PM   #32 
  - but bring it in courts in very liberal area so that SCOTUS is forced to overturn decision  zazen   Jan-21-10 09:29 PM   #35 
     - Unfortunately, I don't think that overturning a right to marry  drm604   Jan-21-10 09:58 PM   #40 
  - Brazilliant!  tomm2thumbs   Jan-21-10 08:57 PM   #23 
  - Then abort it. nt  donco   Jan-21-10 08:57 PM   #24 
  - Why not incorporate one's self and then proceed to marry that corporation.  Roland99   Jan-21-10 09:02 PM   #26 
  - Seriously....I'd LOVE to see someone attempt just that. Tempted to do it, myself.  Roland99   Jan-22-10 09:52 AM   #43 
  - "It's not polygamy; we're a corporation". This could get interesting...  Edweird   Jan-21-10 09:11 PM   #27 
  - I'm surprised the Mormons haven't thought of this already n/t  janet118   Jan-22-10 04:29 PM   #92 
  - I'm in. Pm me the details. I am IN. nt  LaydeeBug   Jan-21-10 09:17 PM   #29 
  - Actually, since it is currently illegal to anyone besides one man & one woman to marry...  Luminous Animal   Jan-21-10 09:25 PM   #33 
  - I'm watching "Gendernauts" and reading this thread  EFerrari   Jan-21-10 09:32 PM   #36 
  - Great documentary!  Luminous Animal   Jan-21-10 11:01 PM   #42 
     - Free Speech TV is running it. Am about to watch it for the 3rd time.  EFerrari   Jan-22-10 02:39 PM   #68 
  - I like your idea...  veganlush   Jan-22-10 02:15 PM   #65 
  - What's the legal definition of "man" and "woman?"  KansDem   Jan-22-10 03:34 PM   #82 
     - Where there's the catch - there ain't one  HillWilliam   Jan-22-10 03:51 PM   #85 
  - To get serious for a moment  drm604   Jan-21-10 09:35 PM   #37 
  - It affects the limits of contribution  kfred   Jan-22-10 03:15 PM   #77 
     - I think the issue of foreign influence is an important talking point.  drm604   Jan-22-10 04:47 PM   #94 
  - Duh, I just got the entirety of what you're saying.  drm604   Jan-21-10 10:07 PM   #41 
  - If I wasn't married...  DisgustedInMN   Jan-22-10 10:18 AM   #44 
  - I am in MN too. Maybe my husband and I can marry you and your husband! LOL!  glinda   Jan-22-10 01:50 PM   #60 
     - It would be...  DisgustedInMN   Jan-22-10 01:56 PM   #62 
        - funny!  glinda   Jan-22-10 03:18 PM   #78 
  - Can corporations be gay?  Captain Hilts   Jan-22-10 10:59 AM   #45 
  - Do I ever love that thought  Rocky2007   Jan-22-10 05:31 PM   #98 
  - I'm in.  hootinholler   Jan-22-10 11:07 AM   #46 
  - ! male volunteer here. Where do we start?  Vincardog   Jan-22-10 11:48 AM   #47 
  - great idea. The corporation can also try to adopt a child, apply for food stamps...  robinlynne   Jan-22-10 11:52 AM   #49 
  - Bwahaha!  FirstLight   Jan-22-10 04:21 PM   #89 
     - why not, as a corporation, demand the right to vote? When that is struck down,  robinlynne   Jan-22-10 05:07 PM   #96 
        - +1 on this thought...  annabanana   Jan-22-10 05:54 PM   #106 
  - I'm game, and unmarried. get married to defend democracy? hell yes!  robinlynne   Jan-22-10 11:53 AM   #50 
  - did they actually say corps have the same rights as person?  crazyjoe   Jan-22-10 11:55 AM   #51 
  - Starts at page 27:  Contrary1   Jan-22-10 12:38 PM   #55 
  - No. It isn't categorical. The thrust of the majority opinion is that speech is protected  Hosnon   Jan-22-10 02:08 PM   #64 
  - Don't corporations marry and divorce all of the time?  madinmaryland   Jan-22-10 12:05 PM   #52 
  - I like the way you think  me b zola   Jan-22-10 12:15 PM   #53 
  - Fuck it, I'll do it.  slay   Jan-22-10 12:58 PM   #56 
  - I like this.  Blue_In_AK   Jan-22-10 01:01 PM   #57 
  - Ooooooooooh,  femrap   Jan-22-10 01:06 PM   #58 
  - I am holding out to marry Microsoft!  Bennyboy   Jan-22-10 01:47 PM   #59 
  - trust Stinky to think of this, it's brilliant! n/t  arthritisR_US   Jan-22-10 01:51 PM   #61 
  - Very clever. I like it. n/t  myrna minx   Jan-22-10 02:05 PM   #63 
  - Next, they will have the right to vote  Born_A_Truman   Jan-22-10 02:21 PM   #66 
  - Actually, I already have a corporation  Born_A_Truman   Jan-22-10 02:25 PM   #67 
  - Marriage as a "domesic merger"  BadgerKid   Jan-22-10 02:42 PM   #70 
  - Just wait until Corporations start applying for welfare and food stamps. eom  NorthCarolina   Jan-22-10 02:43 PM   #71 
  - They already have.  Utopian Leftist   Jan-22-10 03:02 PM   #72 
     - Good point. eom  NorthCarolina   Jan-22-10 03:11 PM   #76 
  - I like the way you think.  Mithreal   Jan-22-10 03:06 PM   #73 
  - Hey I am quite willing to divorce my spouse, in order to marry Monsanto  truedelphi   Jan-22-10 03:11 PM   #75 
  - Love it! n/t  kag   Jan-22-10 03:22 PM   #79 
  - What a genius idea! Hope someone does this. n/t  beac   Jan-22-10 03:37 PM   #83 
  - That's brilliant! Seriously brilliant. +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1  MUAD_DIB   Jan-22-10 03:56 PM   #86 
  - Stinky! you are brilliant!  FirstLight   Jan-22-10 04:16 PM   #88 
  - I like the way you think. nt  blondeatlast   Jan-22-10 04:30 PM   #93 
  - K & Highly rec'd nt  Christa   Jan-22-10 04:48 PM   #95 
  - Yes... Excellent as Mr. Burns would say. K & R  SlingBlade   Jan-22-10 05:26 PM   #97 
  - love the idea,,,how about expanding the idea  Fresh_Start   Jan-22-10 05:32 PM   #99 
  - I've saved the ring off of my cigar and I own a goat.  Major Hogwash   Jan-22-10 05:34 PM   #100 
  - For better or worse - off to Rachel Maddow  Rocky2007   Jan-22-10 05:44 PM   #101 
  - I see a problem right away... DOMA  stevenleser   Jan-22-10 05:44 PM   #102 
  - I can be the single female  abbeyco   Jan-22-10 05:51 PM   #103 
  - Great idea . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Jan-22-10 05:52 PM   #104 
  - so where can we see this draft??  april   Jan-22-10 05:52 PM   #105 
  - Brilliant, I dunno--but  Jackpine Radical   Jan-22-10 05:57 PM   #107 
  - Excellent idea!  sabrina 1   Jan-22-10 06:25 PM   #108 
  - I'm Single and Willing...Sign Me Up!!  PJPhreak   Jan-22-10 06:28 PM   #109 
  - You do know that SCOTUS would not hear the case. It wouldn't need to.  clear eye   Jan-22-10 06:42 PM   #110 
  - Seriously?  badgerpup   Jan-22-10 06:54 PM   #111 
  - Have someone file articles of dissolution and sue for wrongful death. n/t  Cary   Jan-22-10 06:59 PM   #112 
  - We can incorporate as  silenttigersong   Jan-22-10 07:23 PM   #114 
  - It certainly is an interesting idea! Could it work?  MindandSoul   Jan-22-10 07:37 PM   #115 
  - I am happy to do the wedding.  dorktv   Jan-22-10 08:03 PM   #116 
  - Brilliant.  kestrel91316   Jan-22-10 08:19 PM   #117 
  - BEYOND MARRIAGE  Mark D.   Jan-22-10 08:32 PM   #118 
  - I like the idea! Find the three, find a minister and invite the media to attend the ceremony!  Better Believe It   Jan-22-10 10:26 PM   #119 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC