You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: I have a feeling we may not agree, [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I have a feeling we may not agree,
a maybe never will but, from my view, it is horribly ironic in this context, that it was also the Supreme Court that gave us Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Corporate Personhood Should Be Banned, Once and For All by Ralph Nader Better Believe It  Jan-21-10 01:51 PM   #0 
  - A-fucking-men!  FiveGoodMen   Jan-21-10 01:54 PM   #1 
  - Too late  WeDidIt   Jan-21-10 01:55 PM   #2 
  - SHUT UP YOU OLD FOOL YOU COST AL GORE THE ELECTION!!!111!!11oneone!  jgraz   Jan-21-10 01:58 PM   #3 
  - Lieberman would've made such an awesome veep, too  Electric Monk   Jan-21-10 02:07 PM   #7 
  - Less harmful than he has been as a Senator.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 02:26 PM   #13 
  - are you kidding?!!  frylock   Jan-21-10 02:16 PM   #9 
  - He was joking, let me assure you.  inna   Jan-21-10 02:36 PM   #25 
     - i know..  frylock   Jan-21-10 02:48 PM   #30 
  - FUCK NADER !!!11!! OASIS RULEZ!!!11!!111!  Sebastian Doyle   Jan-21-10 02:24 PM   #11 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-21-10 02:25 PM   #12 
  - GOLDSTIEN!!!!!!!!!!!!1111  omega minimo   Jan-21-10 03:04 PM   #37 
  - And the corporatist will be in here to bash Ralph in just a few seconds.  dbonds   Jan-21-10 02:01 PM   #4 
  - Are you kidding. the corporatists and corporations LOVE Nader!!!!  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 02:29 PM   #16 
  - Wrong, that is the spin though  dbonds   Jan-21-10 02:30 PM   #18 
  - Bullshit. Gore himself disavows Ralph being the 'cause' of the installation of Bush  Echo In Light   Jan-21-10 02:32 PM   #20 
  - Psst. See post 12 above  RetroLounge   Jan-21-10 02:38 PM   #26 
  - K&R  pleah   Jan-21-10 02:04 PM   #5 
  - Nader needs to admit he was wrong  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 02:06 PM   #6 
  - The Democrats gave away the right to filibuster Bush's extreme right-wing Supreme Court nominations  Better Believe It   Jan-21-10 02:20 PM   #10 
  - We shouldn't have been placed in a situation of endless filibusters.  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 02:26 PM   #14 
     - I haven't seen any Republican filibusters on C-Span. Have you?  Better Believe It   Jan-21-10 02:28 PM   #15 
     - No I haven't. That's my point.  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 02:29 PM   #17 
     - Have you seen any Democrats stand up for anything that the repukes needed to filibuster about?  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 02:31 PM   #19 
        - Huh?  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 02:50 PM   #32 
     - who cares  G_j   Jan-21-10 02:38 PM   #29 
        - I don't. I care about the recent  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 02:50 PM   #31 
           - I have a feeling we may not agree,  G_j   Jan-21-10 03:00 PM   #34 
              - Too bad they were placed  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 03:01 PM   #35 
  - Refusing to listen to and understand this message is so pigheaded  Book Lover   Jan-21-10 03:02 PM   #36 
  - Recommend.  TexasObserver   Jan-21-10 02:08 PM   #8 
  - I dunno. Maybe it just needs to be expanded.  anonymous171   Jan-21-10 02:35 PM   #21 
  - That thought raises a good question.  sabrina 1   Jan-21-10 03:22 PM   #41 
  - OH, THE IRONY.  moondust   Jan-21-10 02:35 PM   #22 
  - No. He's not.  omega minimo   Jan-21-10 03:06 PM   #38 
  - OOOPPPSSSS! Just noticed this has already been posted. Moderator help welcomed.  Better Believe It   Jan-21-10 02:35 PM   #23 
  - No, no. This thread stands on its own, and many people commented in it.  inna   Jan-21-10 02:38 PM   #28 
  - KR. He said it exactly the way it is.  inna   Jan-21-10 02:35 PM   #24 
  - knr nt  slipslidingaway   Jan-21-10 02:38 PM   #27 
  - Can we ban corporate personhood AND Ralph Nader? n/t  Cessna Invesco Palin   Jan-21-10 02:54 PM   #33 
  - +1,000,000  suzie   Jan-21-10 03:08 PM   #39 
  - Question. Are Corporations considerd "persons" in other Countries? n/t  Bonhomme Richard   Jan-21-10 03:17 PM   #40 
  - Corporate Personhood is a few people taking alot of people's money and using it for their own ends.  glinda   Jan-21-10 07:33 PM   #42 
  - Corporations must be persons or they wouldn't be able to screw us!  Better Believe It   Jan-21-10 07:51 PM   #43 
  - This has already been posted  donheld   Jan-21-10 10:11 PM   #44 
  - If it weren't for YOU, Ralph... Alito and Roberts wouldn't be on the court  scheming daemons   Jan-21-10 10:12 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC