You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #32: A broken clock is right twice a day [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. A broken clock is right twice a day
Nader is right here although he is despicable for what he did in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Ralph Nader: Corporate Personhood Should Be Banned, Once and For All Raster  Jan-21-10 12:15 PM   #0 
  - 90,000+ Florida voters can't be wrong. nt  onehandle   Jan-21-10 12:16 PM   #1 
  - 300,000 "Democrats" in Florida voted for W Bush --- !!!!  defendandprotect   Jan-21-10 10:36 PM   #50 
  - Fuck you, Ralph.  Zoeisright   Jan-21-10 12:16 PM   #2 
  - oh, you don't think he's right? figures!  ima_sinnic   Jan-21-10 12:17 PM   #5 
  - A broken clock is right twice a day  tonysam   Jan-21-10 02:02 PM   #32 
     - Thank you.  BlueDemKev   Jan-21-10 02:41 PM   #36 
     - That bastard! How dare he run like any natural born citizen over 35 is  Raineyb   Jan-21-10 11:20 PM   #63 
        - Okay. So then, why doesn't he run for Congress?  mac56   Jan-22-10 11:25 AM   #75 
  - unbelievable -- the guy is RIGHT and you post this?  Donnachaidh   Jan-21-10 12:21 PM   #10 
  - Was he right when he said that Bush and Gore would have the same impact  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 12:26 PM   #14 
     - that's not the point --  Donnachaidh   Jan-21-10 01:31 PM   #28 
     - It's very much the point.  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 01:39 PM   #29 
     - He created this--he was responsible for Bush appointing enough justices to be a 5-4 decision.  suzie   Jan-21-10 03:17 PM   #44 
        - No he wasn't. When are you going to wake up and stop blaming  Raineyb   Jan-21-10 11:26 PM   #64 
        - When it was Nader's fault, I see no reason to give up laying the responsibility  suzie   Jan-22-10 05:41 PM   #77 
        - Ding, ding, ding!  SeekerBlue   Jan-22-10 05:53 PM   #81 
        - No, he wasn't.  Orsino   Jan-22-10 11:20 AM   #72 
           - I'm sorry but I live in Florida.  suzie   Jan-22-10 05:43 PM   #78 
              - You don't have to apologize for living in Florida.  Orsino   Jan-22-10 08:24 PM   #88 
                 - To ignore that Nader helped throw the election in Florida is simply to  suzie   Jan-22-10 08:27 PM   #90 
                    - As you imply...  Orsino   Jan-23-10 06:03 AM   #92 
     - the dems prove every fucking day that the difference between them and republicans..  frylock   Jan-21-10 02:41 PM   #35 
  - Brilliant analysis. Thanks so much.  Flaneur   Jan-21-10 12:37 PM   #22 
  - Holy shit, really? Not fuck the Supreme court? Not fuck the corporations?  Tailormyst   Jan-21-10 02:06 PM   #33 
  - Course not! We believe in killing messengers even when they're on our side  laughingliberal   Jan-21-10 02:49 PM   #40 
  - OK, can we just stop with the childish "shoot the messenger AND the message" bullshit?  Lorien   Jan-22-10 11:29 AM   #76 
  - Now THERE"S an original post.  bobbolink   Jan-22-10 08:27 PM   #91 
  - Ralph Nader once again speaks the truth  ima_sinnic   Jan-21-10 12:17 PM   #3 
  - I know, they blame Nader and some elderly Jewish folks with confusing ballots INSTEAD of  ShortnFiery   Jan-21-10 12:20 PM   #8 
  - maybe I'll write him in  ima_sinnic   Jan-21-10 12:54 PM   #27 
  - And Nader has been saying this for decades  struggle4progress   Jan-21-10 12:38 PM   #23 
  - Yes, he has. It's a shame he intervened in the way he did in 2000  laughingliberal   Jan-21-10 02:54 PM   #42 
     - you know, that whole Nader issue in 2000  GreenArrow   Jan-21-10 10:15 PM   #48 
  - word up  frylock   Jan-21-10 02:44 PM   #39 
  - +1  Book Lover   Jan-21-10 03:04 PM   #43 
  - Up yerz, ralphie boy. You called bush a, "corporation in a suit." Surely  Kahuna   Jan-21-10 12:17 PM   #4 
  - Ralph Nader isn't wrong, but he is a putz and an asshole.  Political Heretic   Jan-21-10 12:17 PM   #6 
  - +1. nt  Robb   Jan-21-10 12:30 PM   #17 
  - We don't need a constitutional amendment because there's nothing int he Constitution  joeybee12   Jan-21-10 12:18 PM   #7 
  - +1  SammyWinstonJack   Jan-21-10 12:24 PM   #12 
  - joeybee12, unfortunately, we now need an amendment.  JDPriestly   Jan-21-10 12:29 PM   #16 
  - Yep, now that Scotus has ruled, only an amendment can fix this now....  Spazito   Jan-21-10 12:34 PM   #20 
     - We have to act.  JDPriestly   Jan-21-10 03:40 PM   #45 
  - "Corporation = person" has been SCOTUS stance since the nineteenth century  struggle4progress   Jan-21-10 12:37 PM   #21 
  - K&R  StarfarerBill   Jan-21-10 12:21 PM   #9 
  - Nader, the guy who said that Bush and Gore would appoint the same  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 12:22 PM   #11 
  - Well you know, looking at the Democratic Party today, maybe it isn't such a leap.  Raster   Jan-21-10 12:31 PM   #18 
  - It was a leap then and it's a leap now.  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 12:39 PM   #24 
  - LOL. You're being fooled. Look around.  Fading Captain   Jan-21-10 10:57 PM   #57 
  - Bingo.  SeekerBlue   Jan-22-10 05:56 PM   #82 
  - Absolutely not. And Nader wasn't wrong in his assertions.  Raineyb   Jan-21-10 11:38 PM   #66 
  - There we go, same cancer and fail that led to this situation to begin with.  LoZoccolo   Jan-21-10 12:40 PM   #25 
  - +1  Codeine   Jan-21-10 11:04 PM   #60 
  - Sotomayor voted the right way on this , you think McCain's appointee  JI7   Jan-21-10 10:41 PM   #52 
  - Obama appointed Sotomayor.  Codeine   Jan-21-10 11:03 PM   #59 
  - yup, FUCK HIM  JI7   Jan-21-10 10:45 PM   #53 
  - I hate Nader with a passion, but he is right on this point  Xipe Totec   Jan-21-10 12:26 PM   #13 
  - Considering he told voters that the SCOTUS didn't matter enough to vote  mzmolly   Jan-21-10 12:27 PM   #15 
  - That would make sense  treestar   Jan-21-10 02:44 PM   #38 
  - K&R  Echo In Light   Jan-21-10 12:34 PM   #19 
  - K&R  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jan-21-10 12:41 PM   #26 
  - Kick!  Raster   Jan-21-10 01:59 PM   #30 
  - Nader is correct. n/t  Blue_In_AK   Jan-21-10 02:01 PM   #31 
  - knr n/t  slipslidingaway   Jan-21-10 02:37 PM   #34 
  - Rich individuals could still combine to do the same thing  treestar   Jan-21-10 02:42 PM   #37 
  - OH NOES!!!! We gotz to trade teh future of democracy for that!  TheKentuckian   Jan-22-10 05:56 PM   #83 
  - yay :) (I guess I will be banned for agreeing with Ralph.)  krabigirl   Jan-21-10 02:49 PM   #41 
  - Nader is correct... and still an asshole.  Touchdown   Jan-21-10 03:52 PM   #46 
  - If corporate personhood is ended  undergroundpanther   Jan-21-10 10:08 PM   #47 
  - Nader is one of the few who makes any sense  blues90   Jan-21-10 10:35 PM   #49 
  - So what is NAder going to do about it ?  JI7   Jan-21-10 10:40 PM   #51 
  - Just words!  FrenchieCat   Jan-21-10 10:48 PM   #54 
  - To be fair, he was strong up to the early Reagan years to be sure.  TheKentuckian   Jan-22-10 05:58 PM   #84 
  - Obama won't even say the words. So Nader is one up on him.  Fading Captain   Jan-21-10 10:55 PM   #56 
     - Obama nominated Sotomayor  JI7   Jan-21-10 10:58 PM   #58 
  - It is sad and amazing that there are DUers, still so petty and stupid  Fading Captain   Jan-21-10 10:55 PM   #55 
  - The why are you here?  Codeine   Jan-21-10 11:05 PM   #61 
  - The hate for Nader here is what the Democratic party continues to show towards liberals  riverdale   Jan-21-10 11:13 PM   #62 
     - Ha! You're so right. Every time there's a Nader post, I have to build a whole new  salguine   Jan-21-10 11:28 PM   #65 
     - Yeah, another 3rd Party funded by Republicans, like Nader has been?  suzie   Jan-22-10 08:18 PM   #86 
  - Shameless kick!  Raster   Jan-22-10 05:27 AM   #67 
  - Nader's dead right on this one.  Vidar   Jan-22-10 05:38 AM   #68 
  - K&R just to crap on the pathetic few who still feel the need to scapegoat Nader. n/t  D23MIURG23   Jan-22-10 10:45 AM   #69 
  - Go Ralph! tell it like it is! nt  pberq   Jan-22-10 11:13 AM   #70 
  - Kick!  Raster   Jan-22-10 11:18 AM   #71 
  - Right message, wrong messenger.  mac56   Jan-22-10 11:23 AM   #73 
  - Self edit  mac56   Jan-22-10 11:23 AM   #74 
  - Republican election fraud caused Bush to win, Not Nader  upi402   Jan-22-10 05:45 PM   #79 
  - Absolutely wrong.  suzie   Jan-22-10 08:23 PM   #87 
  - Ralph was right and is right.  SeekerBlue   Jan-22-10 05:52 PM   #80 
  - He's right as rain. Pooh-poo at your own risk and to display you're own ignorance  TheKentuckian   Jan-22-10 06:00 PM   #85 
  - A Nader thread with 85 recs  arcadian   Jan-22-10 08:26 PM   #89 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC