You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #40: Of course, one could attempt to strip corporate person hood away [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
40. Of course, one could attempt to strip corporate person hood away
by oh, passing a law that restricts the rights as listed in the constitution to natural persons. Probably won't see that idea floated much though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Shumer: We will regret the day this decision was issued. deminks  Jan-21-10 10:25 AM   #0 
  - Yep, stick a fork in We the People. We're done.  shadowknows69   Jan-21-10 10:27 AM   #1 
  - Amen.  peace frog   Jan-21-10 10:28 AM   #3 
  - The final fascist nail.  tekisui   Jan-21-10 10:34 AM   #7 
     - So where does that leave us? Fucked to be sure.  shadowknows69   Jan-21-10 10:36 AM   #9 
     - Sorry for the blunt language, but expletives seem to be the only way I can express myself today.  shadowknows69   Jan-21-10 10:40 AM   #13 
        - No apology needed. There just cannot be any other way to express the emotions  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:50 AM   #22 
     - Hyperbole much? Damn. And no, I don't agree with this decision  anigbrowl   Jan-21-10 11:31 AM   #41 
     - Welcome to GEmerica, a wholly-owned subsidiary!  Ignis   Jan-21-10 12:05 PM   #42 
  - And then MSNBC breaks away from Schumer to bring us the REAL news:  dgibby   Jan-21-10 10:28 AM   #2 
  - Bread and circuses  Nuclear Unicorn   Jan-21-10 11:09 AM   #34 
     - Zackly!!!!!!!!  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 11:11 AM   #35 
  - Our 'government' just became irrelevant.  branders seine   Jan-21-10 10:28 AM   #4 
  - I'm so depressed.  dgibby   Jan-21-10 10:32 AM   #5 
     - That's exactly what has happened - our government has been overthrown  TornadoTN   Jan-21-10 10:35 AM   #8 
     - I agree.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 11:13 AM   #36 
  - Can't fault Schumer for saying that - because it's the truth  TornadoTN   Jan-21-10 10:33 AM   #6 
  - Maybe if Schumer had not bent over for the corporations like he always did, we would not  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:51 AM   #23 
     - I completely agree with you - Schumer is probably just recognizing what he himself has contributed  TornadoTN   Jan-21-10 11:03 AM   #32 
  - Well dammit write a bill to strip corporations of this capability...  SnoopDog   Jan-21-10 10:37 AM   #10 
  - Exactly, thought the rethugs, who are no doubt rejoicing, didn't like legislation from the bench?  shadowknows69   Jan-21-10 10:38 AM   #12 
  - It Takes More Than That...  KharmaTrain   Jan-21-10 10:41 AM   #15 
  - Coming from Schumer. That means absolutely nothing. Even if true.  shadowknows69   Jan-21-10 10:37 AM   #11 
  - Quite true.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:41 AM   #16 
  - I can't help  PATRICK   Jan-21-10 10:45 AM   #19 
  - He has brass balls to complain about this since he was complicit in it.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:49 AM   #21 
  - Schumer worked actively AGAINST a filibuster of Alito. Planted smears against Kerry in the press  blm   Jan-21-10 11:14 AM   #38 
  - Schumer makes statements like this PUBLICLY, but, is right now working against Climate Change bill  blm   Jan-21-10 10:54 AM   #28 
  - +1. Words from Senator "Robust Public Option" Schumer mean nothing. He'll  alsame   Jan-21-10 10:58 AM   #29 
     - He says 'robust public option' to left while insisting corporations need 'level playing field'  blm   Jan-21-10 11:02 AM   #31 
        - He is a master of talking out of both sides of his mouth. He's my Senator and  alsame   Jan-21-10 11:18 AM   #39 
  - Since when is a corporation the same as a person?  BlueDemKev   Jan-21-10 10:40 AM   #14 
  - Since 1886 SANTA CLARA COUNTY v. SOUTHERN PAC. R. CO., 118 U.S. 394 (1886)  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:42 AM   #17 
     - Thaty was THE day  PATRICK   Jan-21-10 11:03 AM   #33 
     - That was 10 years before ANOTHER infamous SC ruling....  BlueDemKev   Jan-21-10 12:58 PM   #43 
  - One Party Rule -------- Recorprocrats.  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Jan-21-10 10:44 AM   #18 
  - Yep! that is the perfect name for them.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:53 AM   #25 
  - Schumer has some pair to come out now and decry corporations!!  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:48 AM   #20 
  - It is ironic. The guy who designed the" level playing field" public option  Phoebe Loosinhouse   Jan-21-10 10:52 AM   #24 
     - I agree. I never did vote for him..and vowed a while back that I never would.  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 10:53 AM   #26 
  - Good thing our powder's still dry, eh Chuck?  Marr   Jan-21-10 10:54 AM   #27 
  - Yep - Schumer worked to STOP a filibuster of Alito. His lipservice is to convince base he's with us  blm   Jan-21-10 10:59 AM   #30 
     - a SNAKE!! That is it! That is exactly what Schumer reminds me of...  BrklynLiberal   Jan-21-10 11:14 AM   #37 
  - Of course, one could attempt to strip corporate person hood away  Raineyb   Jan-21-10 11:31 AM   #40 
  - Typical DLC member; says one thing and does another.  Individualist   Jan-21-10 01:01 PM   #44 
  - Hey, Corporate Whore Schumer, I regret Alito, and that  adigal   Jan-21-10 01:04 PM   #45 
  - +1  Libertas1776   Jan-21-10 01:05 PM   #46 
  - No, we're going to regret the day when you did nothing about it, Chuckie...  GoCubsGo   Jan-21-10 01:10 PM   #47 
  - What a snake n/t  politicasista   Jan-21-10 02:24 PM   #48 
  - If the courts treated people as corporations, what with all the tax breaks and whatnot,  closeupready   Jan-21-10 02:30 PM   #49 
  - IMPEACH the Justasses Chuck!  Hubert Flottz   Jan-21-10 02:50 PM   #50 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC