You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #13: I see nothing wrong with [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Madspirit

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Apr-25-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5

13. I see nothing wrong with

I see nothing wrong with your question. You're simply asking if it will really cripple Bush in any real way, to impeach him. Valid quesion and I don't have an answer. I just wanted to defend your right to ask it.
Lee

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

-Did impeachment hearings restrain or prevent Clinton . . . from doing ANYTHING?	bigtree	Apr-25-07 10:34 AM	#0
- oh yes, the Wag the Dog charge...i remember that.	illinoisprogressive	Apr-25-07 10:38 AM	#1
- It distracted the Clinton WH from getting much done in the last couple of years n/t	rox63	Apr-25-07 10:49 AM	#2
- that may have been a consequence of their lame-duck status	bigtree	Apr-25-07 10:56 AM	#3
- Clinton was only guilty of lying under oath about getting a blowjob.	porphyrian	Apr-25-07 10:59 AM	#4
- that's the new trend here these days: questioning motives	bigtree	Apr-25-07 11:04 AM	#5
- Again, your comparison isn't realistic.	porphyrian	Apr-25-07 11:15 AM	#6
- why be such an ass to me? you gave your opinion.	bigtree	Apr-25-07 11:42 AM	#8
- I'm an ass to everyone, you're not special.	porphyrian	Apr-25-07 12:10 PM	#10
- you're not as slick as you think. you slid the McCarthy-ite crap in at the end	bigtree	Apr-25-07 12:54 PM	#12
- You don't know what I think beyond what I tell you.	porphyrian	Apr-25-07 01:06 PM	#15
- Oh, I see the case for impeachment	bigtree	Apr-25-07 01:16 PM	#18
- As I said, it's not necessary to have Congressional support to unseat the President to impeach.	porphyrian	Apr-25-07 01:21 PM	#
- Bigtree, I agree with you that it's important to ask questions about the process	BurtWorm	Apr-25-07 12:15 PM	#11
- you've got to think that one of the committees will put together something	bigtree	Apr-25-07 01:04 PM	#14
- I suspect it will be a new revelation about an old issue, namely the leadup to Iraq	BurtWorm	Apr-25-07 01:11 PM	#17
- he's got a slew	bigtree	Apr-25-07 01:21 PM	#19
- I see nothing wrong with	Madspirit	Apr-25-07 12:59 PM	#13
- Maybe not but	Threedifferentones	Apr-25-07 11:42 AM	#7
- where do we have that evidence in Congress?	bigtree	Apr-25-07 11:52 AM	#9
- One thing is certain:	H2O Man	Apr-25-07 01:10 PM	#16
- I'll defer to the notion that pressure is a good and sometimes productive course	bigtree	Apr-25-07 01:37 PM	#22
- I have the Conyers report. Enough in there	mmonk	Apr-25-07 01:39 PM	#23
- All of the contents of that document are known to members of Congress	bigtree	Apr-25-07 01:45 PM	#24
- The Conyers report isn't the only thing out there,	mmonk	Apr-25-07 05:33 PM	#25
- Clinton Was A Consummate Professional	Mr. Ected	Apr-25-07 01:27 PM	#20
- Doing nothing certainly won't (not even the congressional hearings).	mmonk	Apr-25-07 01:31 PM	#21

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.