You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #9: Rewording this post as well. Picky all of a sudden, folks. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Rewording this post as well. Picky all of a sudden, folks.
Edited on Fri Jan-15-10 12:43 AM by madfloridian
A man that murdered another man in cold blood is perhaps being allowed to present a defense of voluntary manslaughter.

With that in mind it is not incomprehensible that a subpoena might not be stopped.

That is what I meant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Roeder subpoenaed Tiller's wife for 2009 records of procedures done at the clinic. madfloridian  Jan-14-10 11:51 PM   #0 
  - k/r  Solly Mack   Jan-14-10 11:51 PM   #1 
  - Unfuckingbelievable!  katandmoon   Jan-14-10 11:57 PM   #2 
  - +1000!  GreenPartyVoter   Jan-15-10 11:41 PM   #50 
  - There's truth in the question:  CaliforniaPeggy   Jan-14-10 11:59 PM   #3 
  - Unholy.  Guilded Lilly   Jan-15-10 12:01 AM   #4 
  - Evil bastard  Hekate   Jan-15-10 12:02 AM   #5 
  - Unconstitutional. How does this not violate privacy laws? knr for heads up nt  Union Yes   Jan-15-10 12:03 AM   #6 
  - What century is this again?  Starry Messenger   Jan-15-10 12:09 AM   #7 
  - I doubt Roeder will get these documents. They might play a role in a necessity defense, but  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 12:09 AM   #8 
  - Rewording this post as well. Picky all of a sudden, folks.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:15 AM   #9 
  - Judge being commendably cautious in Roeder trial (Kansas City Star)  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 12:31 AM   #14 
  - Manslaughter Defense Remains Open Issue in Doctors Killing (NYT)  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 12:32 AM   #15 
  - Attacking Roeder's manslaughter defense  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 12:33 AM   #17 
  - If you do a little digging,  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:38 AM   #19 
  - It should not even be considered.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:44 AM   #20 
  - The judge is avoiding  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:46 AM   #23 
     - Very good then. Hope Roeder gets what he needs....  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:48 AM   #25 
        - That's my hope, too.  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 02:05 AM   #30 
  - Judge Wilbert  Mopar151   Jan-16-10 04:55 AM   #53 
  - My points are, first, regarding the prospects of the defense as a whole, and, second,  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 05:26 AM   #35 
  - If this can be voluntary manslaughter defense so could the Fort Hood  jbnow   Jan-15-10 02:48 AM   #32 
     - Ft Hood is in Texas so the peculiarities of Kansas law may not apply  struggle4progress   Jan-15-10 06:57 AM   #36 
  - I think that HIPPA laws might come into play here n/t  azurnoir   Jan-15-10 12:16 AM   #10 
  - Oh... uh, yeah.  The Doctor.   Jan-15-10 12:20 AM   #12 
     - ain' nothang  azurnoir   Jan-15-10 08:06 AM   #37 
  - Can you say "HIPPA"?  The Doctor.   Jan-15-10 12:19 AM   #11 
  - I would certainly hope HIPAA would stop this. I am not trusting.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:35 AM   #18 
     - Having personal dealings with HIPAA myself, I can tell you with certainty  The Doctor.   Jan-15-10 03:17 AM   #33 
        - Actually he's looking at that fine per name mentioned  azurnoir   Jan-15-10 08:07 AM   #38 
           - There's a resonable risk of disclosure by giving those names out.  The Doctor.   Jan-15-10 10:05 AM   #44 
  - Where did this originate?  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:27 AM   #13 
  - Here is just one link. I did not pull it out of the air.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:33 AM   #16 
     - Yeah,  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:44 AM   #21 
        - That is what I posted in the OP. Why do you want to argue?  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:45 AM   #22 
           - No argument.  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:48 AM   #26 
  - Now DUers are protective of Roeder's right to a manslaughter plea.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:47 AM   #24 
  - I don't see anybody saying  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 12:51 AM   #27 
     - You called it a tempest in a teapot.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 12:53 AM   #28 
        - Yes, my words are clear.  TicketyBoo   Jan-15-10 02:04 AM   #29 
        - Dear Mad  Binka   Jan-15-10 04:09 AM   #34 
           - You are right, I think.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 03:02 PM   #45 
  - In California, our state Constitution guarantees our right to privacy.  JDPriestly   Jan-15-10 02:27 AM   #31 
  - soon it will be open season on doctors  spanone   Jan-15-10 08:11 AM   #39 
  - This is political - where is the link to Phil Klein??  cbdo2007   Jan-15-10 08:39 AM   #40 
  - Just think. A man walks into a church and kills a doctor.  madfloridian   Jan-15-10 08:54 AM   #41 
  - This has a striking similarity to the show trials of the South during the civil rights era  NJmaverick   Jan-15-10 09:09 AM   #42 
  - This has a striking similarity to the show trials of the South during the civil rights era  NJmaverick   Jan-15-10 09:09 AM   #43 
  - Wow  jonathon   Jan-15-10 07:45 PM   #46 
  - I fucking hate  femrap   Jan-15-10 08:58 PM   #47 
  - It's Kansas. The only thing to be surprised about would be a murder conviction.  Gman   Jan-15-10 10:20 PM   #48 
  - Roeder and his ilk are scumbag pieces of shit. check out what they are up to now  greenbriar   Jan-15-10 10:44 PM   #49 
  - Thank you, Mad  Mithreal   Jan-16-10 12:34 AM   #51 
  - The only thing I'm worried about here is the possibility...  jmowreader   Jan-16-10 12:54 AM   #52 
  - Manslaughter - Kansas Law - No way.  Piewhacket   Jan-16-10 05:47 PM   #54 
  - against cap punishment but in his case a gas chamber is too good  dembotoz   Jan-16-10 05:59 PM   #55 
  - Hung upside down until he pisses and shits on himself  Maru Kitteh   Jan-16-10 06:07 PM   #56 
  - Okay, I'm confused. How can records Roeder has never seen  Hansel   Jan-16-10 07:24 PM   #57 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC