You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Did you miss the part about having two other kids? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-14-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Did you miss the part about having two other kids?
If nobody was able to step in and care for them for months, she might not have had a choice in the matter.

I'm not pregnant or looking to be, but if were and my choices were months and months of bed rest or a miscarriage, I'd ask for a D&C. First off, because I'm a single parent and I don't have anybody to drop anything and deal with my kid, let alone my other responsibilities, for months on end, and second because in a pregnancy that risky the outcomes would probably not be favorable anyhow.

For that matter, extended bed rest is itself a health risk for the woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  - Pregnant Woman Fights Court-Ordered Bed Rest The Straight Story  Jan-14-10 08:24 PM   #0 
  - I can't believe they court ordered her to bed. Outrageous.  virgogal   Jan-14-10 08:30 PM   #1 
  - They should just build massive prison colonies for pregnant women.  Crunchy Frog   Jan-14-10 08:37 PM   #2 
  - did you ever read margaret atwood's "a handmaid's tale"?  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:26 PM   #9 
  - All women of reproductive age, really.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-14-10 09:34 PM   #13 
     - yeah, who was the idiot who actually said all women had to be considered "pre-pregnant"  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:35 PM   #14 
  - outrageous precedent indeed. the damned woman-hating pro-forced birthers and their ilk  niyad   Jan-14-10 08:38 PM   #3 
  - Yes, and did you notice...  CoffeeCat   Jan-14-10 10:25 PM   #22 
     - DING DING DING! CoffeeCat, you're our grand prize winner!  rocktivity   Jan-15-10 11:44 AM   #29 
        - goodness, that sounds like a lot of very bitter guesswork, or is it something else>  niyad   Jan-15-10 10:01 PM   #35 
        - Being forcefully confined/imprisoned in the hospital ...  winyanstaz   Jan-16-10 01:46 PM   #51 
  - That hospital overstepped their authority.  ThomCat   Jan-14-10 08:38 PM   #4 
  - I hope she wins  fishwax   Jan-14-10 08:48 PM   #5 
  - by the way, did anyone notice? SHE MISCARRIED ANYWAY--one has to wonder if the stress of being  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:05 PM   #6 
  - I read a story about a woman who had to spend her entire pregnancy in bed  rocktivity   Jan-14-10 09:20 PM   #7 
  - you seem to be completely missing all the points here-- she has two children at home, for starters.  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:25 PM   #8 
  - Did you miss the part about having two other kids?  LeftyMom   Jan-14-10 09:29 PM   #10 
  - and after all that, she miscarried anyway. there are never any guarantees  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:34 PM   #12 
  - The hosptial felt that she was IN NO CONDITION to take care of her kids  rocktivity   Jan-14-10 09:41 PM   #16 
     - Sometimes part of being a mom is doing things you're in no condition to do.  LeftyMom   Jan-14-10 09:44 PM   #17 
     - you are STILL MISSING THE POINT--it was NOT the hospital's place to make her health care decision  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:45 PM   #18 
     - the hospital was concerned about the fetus, not her two children at home  fishwax   Jan-14-10 09:50 PM   #21 
     - Nobody forced her to GO to the hospital when she decided that she needed help  rocktivity   Jan-15-10 10:57 AM   #28 
     - WHO's best interest?  TorchTheWitch   Jan-15-10 03:57 PM   #31 
     - I am still waiting for rock to respond to the rest of the court order--did you happen to see THIS  niyad   Jan-15-10 09:56 PM   #33 
     - the hospital had NO RIGHT to interfere the way it did. I have asked you to show me ONE case where a  niyad   Jan-15-10 09:53 PM   #32 
     - I am still waiting to hear your response to the rest of that disgusting court order  niyad   Jan-15-10 09:59 PM   #34 
     - So basically you're saying the rights of her fetus trump hers.  Pithlet   Jan-15-10 10:08 PM   #38 
     - Your first two sentences totally contradict each other.  liberalhistorian   Jan-15-10 11:56 PM   #46 
     - sorry..that is not a legal argument.  winyanstaz   Jan-16-10 01:51 PM   #52 
     - and did you notice that she did, in fact, miscarry?  niyad   Jan-15-10 10:08 PM   #37 
        - yep -- having your rights voided like that is bound to be stressful  fishwax   Jan-15-10 10:37 PM   #40 
     - "The hospital felt", "medical advice"  liberalhistorian   Jan-16-10 01:24 PM   #50 
     - My grandparents were in a car accident when my grandmother was pregnant with their third child.  jmm   Jan-16-10 01:57 PM   #53 
  - so, tut tut, whatever big daddy says? wtf.  mopinko   Jan-14-10 09:50 PM   #20 
  - exactly. each woman has to be free to determine  OhioBlue   Jan-15-10 10:15 PM   #39 
  - she had a legal right to get a 2nd opinion  northernlights   Jan-15-10 11:12 PM   #43 
  - the doctor who pushed for this should be widely advertised  SmileyRose   Jan-14-10 09:31 PM   #11 
  - Dr. Jana Bures-Forsthoefel  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:46 PM   #19 
     - Yup. Just Google Dr. Jana Bures-Forsthoefel  Gold Metal Flake   Jan-15-10 10:55 AM   #27 
        - was looking for the section where one can post comments on the doctors--have a thing or two  niyad   Jan-15-10 10:06 PM   #36 
  - the court order, by the way, was not limited to bed rest:  niyad   Jan-14-10 09:39 PM   #15 
  - Absolutely absurd and extremely disturbing  Blasphemer   Jan-15-10 11:13 PM   #44 
  - Kick  ck4829   Jan-15-10 05:56 AM   #23 
  - K&R n/t  Sans Culottes   Jan-15-10 07:25 AM   #24 
  - welcome to DU  niyad   Jan-15-10 09:32 AM   #25 
     - Thanks, niyad!  Sans Culottes   Jan-15-10 03:32 PM   #30 
  - ....  niyad   Jan-15-10 10:52 AM   #26 
  - ....  niyad   Jan-15-10 10:51 PM   #41 
  - frightening  barb162   Jan-15-10 10:59 PM   #42 
  - indeed it is, and what is also frightening is the defense of that order on this thread.  niyad   Jan-15-10 11:15 PM   #45 
  - .....  niyad   Jan-16-10 09:38 AM   #47 
  - ...  niyad   Jan-16-10 10:20 AM   #48 
  - This is beyond chilling.  shadesofgray   Jan-16-10 10:40 AM   #49 
  - . . . .  niyad   Jan-16-10 06:55 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC