You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #44: That will result in high prices. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
silverhandorder Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-11-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. That will result in high prices.
Small sites get bundle deals anyways and are treated as big sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Do you support Net Neutrality? Uncle Joe  Jan-11-10 03:02 PM   #0 
  - Who the hell voted "No?"  sakabatou   Jan-11-10 03:04 PM   #1 
  - They should be 86'd from the intertubes  me b zola   Jan-11-10 03:10 PM   #3 
  - Yes. n/t  me b zola   Jan-11-10 03:10 PM   #5 
  - Nah ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-11-10 04:02 PM   #23 
  - If there's a right wing position to take  Sebastian Doyle   Jan-11-10 03:10 PM   #4 
  - my first thought as well  ixion   Jan-11-10 03:33 PM   #15 
  - It's a very misunderstood topic.  Pithlet   Jan-11-10 04:00 PM   #22 
  - Some of the RW A-Holes who routinely post here  GreenMetalFlake   Jan-12-10 05:44 AM   #94 
  - Not "yes" but "HELL yes!!!"  KansDem   Jan-11-10 03:09 PM   #2 
  - Damn it.  Ignis   Jan-11-10 03:11 PM   #6 
  - Really, who voted no? n/t  ghurley   Jan-11-10 03:12 PM   #7 
  - "Uncle Joe"  RUMMYisFROSTED   Jan-11-10 03:15 PM   #8 
  - It's a series of tubes!!!!!!!  Initech   Jan-11-10 03:16 PM   #9 
  - I voted no  notesdev   Jan-11-10 03:25 PM   #10 
  - That has absoutely ZERO to do with net neutrality.  Lance_Boyle   Jan-11-10 03:27 PM   #12 
  - Please explain how net neutrality would interefere with that?  blogslut   Jan-11-10 03:28 PM   #13 
  - The way I understand it  notesdev   Jan-11-10 03:30 PM   #14 
     - So you're talking about VOIP 911 calls?  drm604   Jan-11-10 03:48 PM   #19 
     - I'm scouring the Telecommunications Act  blogslut   Jan-11-10 03:51 PM   #20 
        - I'm not sure those measures are in place  notesdev   Jan-11-10 03:54 PM   #21 
           - The net neutrality argument is about whether or not we should let corporations decide the priorities  drm604   Jan-11-10 04:02 PM   #24 
           - That will result in high prices.  silverhandorder   Jan-11-10 04:55 PM   #44 
              - I don't understand your point.  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:16 PM   #58 
           - I'm pretty sure they are  blogslut   Jan-11-10 04:02 PM   #25 
              - Looking over the arguments  notesdev   Jan-11-10 04:13 PM   #28 
                 - You're still missing the point.  drm604   Jan-11-10 04:24 PM   #29 
                 - Well, they do actually own the networks  notesdev   Jan-11-10 04:39 PM   #32 
                    - You don't have a driver's license?  Pithlet   Jan-11-10 04:41 PM   #34 
                    - The networks aren't "owned"  blogslut   Jan-11-10 04:42 PM   #35 
                    - Are you in the right place?  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:03 PM   #51 
                 - You don't see ANY compelling case for it?  Ignis   Jan-11-10 04:37 PM   #30 
                 - If it were that simple  notesdev   Jan-11-10 04:45 PM   #37 
                    - The point was this:  Ignis   Jan-11-10 04:53 PM   #42 
                    - No  notesdev   Jan-11-10 04:58 PM   #46 
                       - OK, what is your major contention about 'Net Neutrality'?  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 05:00 PM   #47 
                       - prevent_recursion=true;  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:03 PM   #50 
                          - 'Line 28' of what? Where?  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 05:16 PM   #59 
                          - Presumably, that's his twee way of saying, "See post #28."  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:19 PM   #63 
                             - you are  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:26 PM   #69 
                                - So, was I "hysterically" wrong or "hysterically" right? (nt)  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:31 PM   #74 
                                - I don't see anyone getting hysterical or silly.  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:33 PM   #75 
                                   - Aww, thanks.  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:39 PM   #77 
                                      - I wasn't being hostile to you  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:46 PM   #78 
                                      - Apology accepted. Please see post #82 for the rest. (nt)  Ignis   Jan-11-10 06:26 PM   #84 
                                      - ....  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 10:12 PM   #89 
                                      - I'm only human.  Ignis   Jan-12-10 01:16 AM   #91 
                          - Is that sarcasm or is there a point?  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:18 PM   #61 
                       - No lay-supporter of net neutrality is arguing for the things you are talking about  DireStrike   Jan-11-10 05:07 PM   #52 
                       - Those of us who are chronically ignorant call it a "strawman."  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:21 PM   #64 
                       - Please explain to us clearly and precisely how it is  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:10 PM   #53 
                       - I'm the only one who has taken an engineer's approach  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:23 PM   #66 
                          - Bzzzt, wrong answer. Thank you for playing.  drm604   Jan-11-10 05:30 PM   #71 
                          - The only one, huh?  Pithlet   Jan-11-10 05:30 PM   #73 
                       - All you've shown is you're proficient in delivering Libertarian talking points.  Pithlet   Jan-11-10 05:12 PM   #54 
                       - Sad but true.  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:16 PM   #57 
                       - Oh, now THAT was funny. Thanks for the laugh!  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:14 PM   #55 
                          - Nah I'm not arguing from authority  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:35 PM   #76 
                             - To which argumentum ad populam are you referring?  Ignis   Jan-11-10 06:22 PM   #82 
                    - Re:  chrisa   Jan-11-10 08:30 PM   #86 
                 - Net neutrality is about making laws telling the corporations who controll access  Pithlet   Jan-11-10 04:38 PM   #31 
                 - What arguments are you reading?  blogslut   Jan-11-10 04:40 PM   #33 
                 - just the wiki summary  notesdev   Jan-11-10 04:51 PM   #39 
                    - What???  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 05:15 PM   #56 
                       - Shh, facts are inconvenient!  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:17 PM   #60 
                       - wrong referent  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:24 PM   #67 
                          - LOL... I had a funny feeling you'd catch that instead of getting the point.  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 08:50 PM   #87 
                 - You're *really* missing the boat here...  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 04:56 PM   #45 
                 - According to the doctrine as written  notesdev   Jan-11-10 05:01 PM   #48 
                    - We have it by default until the ISPs decide otherwise. eom.  The Doctor.   Jan-11-10 05:18 PM   #62 
                 - And how do you tell who are the spammers and traffickers  sudopod   Jan-11-10 05:57 PM   #80 
  - This is absolutely right.  silverhandorder   Jan-11-10 04:53 PM   #41 
     - Any sources for your attempted AT&T monopoly claim? (nt)  Ignis   Jan-11-10 04:54 PM   #43 
        - I'll get back to you on this.  silverhandorder   Jan-11-10 05:02 PM   #49 
        - Much appreciated, and welcome to DU. (nt)  Ignis   Jan-11-10 05:22 PM   #65 
        - Sorry my original source was a convo between IT techs working for ISPs.  silverhandorder   Jan-11-10 05:30 PM   #72 
  - Yes and No Merger! --->  onehandle   Jan-11-10 03:25 PM   #11 
  - I'm a bit confused on NN WRT Satellite internet  Born_A_Truman   Jan-11-10 03:33 PM   #16 
  - It wont help  negativenihil   Jan-11-10 04:12 PM   #27 
     - Where I live we have no cable  Born_A_Truman   Jan-11-10 04:45 PM   #36 
  - YES!!!  Odin2005   Jan-11-10 03:38 PM   #17 
  - yes. nt  endless october   Jan-11-10 03:44 PM   #18 
  - Yes  pokerfan   Jan-11-10 04:06 PM   #26 
  - What is it?  Xenotime   Jan-11-10 04:46 PM   #38 
  - .....  bigwillq   Jan-11-10 05:27 PM   #70 
  - Do we have it now?  Fla_Democrat   Jan-11-10 04:52 PM   #40 
  - There IS a legitimate reason to argue against it.  Xithras   Jan-11-10 05:25 PM   #68 
  - Valid points, but there's been precious little middle ground on this issue.  Ignis   Jan-11-10 06:25 PM   #83 
     - Indeed. It's a technical discussion being had by people with little understanding of the technology.  Xithras   Jan-11-10 08:11 PM   #85 
        - Well, to be fair to the Neutralist position...  Ignis   Jan-12-10 01:23 AM   #93 
  - I chose support ..... n/t  gleaner   Jan-11-10 05:53 PM   #79 
  - One of the highest priorities in my mind.  TheKentuckian   Jan-11-10 06:00 PM   #81 
  - What idiot would say no? LAMER  L0oniX   Jan-11-10 08:53 PM   #88 
  - Yes.  Vidar   Jan-11-10 10:12 PM   #90 
  - Yes  amborin   Jan-12-10 01:20 AM   #92 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC