NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-09-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. GOOD. Let Them Spend Stockholder Money On Donations |
|
Instead of squeezing it out of employees.
|
| -Supreme Court to Remove Restrictions on Corporate Donations |
happy_liberal |
Jan-09-10 12:29 PM |
#0 |
-
Ah yes, the Corporate States of America... |
nadinbrzezinski |
Jan-09-10 12:31 PM |
#1 |
 -
thanks |
happy_liberal |
Jan-09-10 01:03 PM |
#11 |
 -
I wonder right along with you. When I've tried to encourage large-scale demonstrations and |
Atticus |
Jan-09-10 04:32 PM |
#30 |
-
Money equals speech |
Orrex |
Jan-09-10 12:32 PM |
#2 |
-
The end of the Republic. |
earthside |
Jan-09-10 12:33 PM |
#3 |
 -
oops wrong reply |
slampoet |
Jan-09-10 11:53 PM |
#41 |
-
Well now we know why dems sold us out. |
dkf |
Jan-09-10 12:35 PM |
#4 |
-
Goodbye America, we knew ye well.....n/t |
monmouth |
Jan-09-10 12:36 PM |
#5 |
-
Remember that Nader thought these Supreme Court justices were irrelevant to think about |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-09-10 12:37 PM |
#6 |
 -
Nader has nothing to do with this. nt |
anonymous171 |
Jan-09-10 01:37 PM |
#15 |
  -
Supreme Court nominees amount to "not a dime's worth of difference" between Bush* and Gore. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-09-10 04:29 PM |
#28 |
 -
Where is your link to that? |
harkadog |
Jan-09-10 04:04 PM |
#26 |
  -
OK then, back to the beginning. Why would you vote for Nader over Gore in 2000? n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-09-10 04:30 PM |
#29 |
 -
I was just wondering if you made up the quote. |
harkadog |
Jan-09-10 05:28 PM |
#33 |
 -
And your idols would appoint justices who agree with the current crop. |
Marr |
Jan-09-10 04:39 PM |
#31 |
-
No they wouldn't. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-09-10 06:51 PM |
#36 |
-
You don't think an Obama nominee would be for allowing corporations |
Marr |
Jan-09-10 07:24 PM |
#37 |
-
Do you think Clinton's appointees would? n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-09-10 07:36 PM |
#38 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-09-10 12:38 PM |
#7 |
-
This really will be the beginning of the end........ |
rd_kent |
Jan-09-10 12:46 PM |
#8 |
-
Democracy is dead. |
Odin2005 |
Jan-09-10 12:51 PM |
#9 |
 -
+100 |
emilyg |
Jan-09-10 12:56 PM |
#10 |
 -
Long live Corporatacracy |
tinrobot |
Jan-09-10 01:14 PM |
#12 |
  -
+1000 |
donheld |
Jan-09-10 11:35 PM |
#40 |
 -
+1 |
liberal_at_heart |
Jan-09-10 03:51 PM |
#24 |
-
an aside but did anyone notice this? |
happy_liberal |
Jan-09-10 01:20 PM |
#13 |
 -
I think the protocol |
netania99 |
Jan-09-10 02:40 PM |
#19 |
 -
That's the Times' "house style"; they *ALWAYS* write that way. (NT) |
Tesha |
Jan-09-10 03:45 PM |
#22 |
-
Well, that's good |
90-percent |
Jan-09-10 01:35 PM |
#14 |
 -
yes, exactly! |
happy_liberal |
Jan-09-10 01:45 PM |
#16 |
-
GOOD. Let Them Spend Stockholder Money On Donations |
NashVegas |
Jan-09-10 01:51 PM |
#17 |
-
but thank goodness we have all this dry powder here... |
NuttyFluffers |
Jan-09-10 02:07 PM |
#18 |
-
Isn't that just a little misleading? |
Frosty1 |
Jan-09-10 02:57 PM |
#20 |
-
Wow, we'll have the best faux democracy corporations can buy! |
highplainsdem |
Jan-09-10 03:06 PM |
#21 |
-
Well, if corporations attain full "personhood", maybe we can start giving them the death penalty... |
Tesha |
Jan-09-10 03:49 PM |
#23 |
-
We already get bombarded by negative ads. |
liberal_at_heart |
Jan-09-10 03:51 PM |
#25 |
-
Well, no need to vote. n/t |
Fire1 |
Jan-09-10 04:04 PM |
#27 |
-
The final triumph of the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy |
starroute |
Jan-09-10 05:20 PM |
#32 |
-
the last nail in the coffin |
G_j |
Jan-09-10 05:41 PM |
#34 |
-
If it happens, it is a REVOLUTION AGAINST DEMOCRACY. Let's not let this acclimate acceptance of that |
Land Shark |
Jan-09-10 06:36 PM |
#35 |
-
K&R |
G_j |
Jan-09-10 09:32 PM |
#39 |
-
so . . . not only do the corporations own the legislative and executive branches of government . . . |
OneBlueSky |
Jan-10-10 03:54 AM |
#42 |
-
So? Not any different than it is now. |
Kablooie |
Jan-10-10 11:40 AM |
#43 |