You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: taxing the insurance co side of the equation [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. taxing the insurance co side of the equation
surely won't lead to them reducing benefits or passing that cost on to customers because....??

Is there a law restricting insurance companies from passing those costs on to consumers? Some kind of regulation that protects people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Damnit People, IGNORE THE SPIN. Inform yourselves about what the AWFUL "Cadillac Tax" MEANS for YOU chimpymustgo  Jan-07-10 03:14 PM   #0 
  - Of course it includes many of us - its meant to control costs  stray cat   Jan-07-10 03:16 PM   #1 
  - ANd it's an AWFUL idea. Why hit the middle class, rather than taxing the rich to PAY for subsidies?  chimpymustgo   Jan-07-10 03:22 PM   #9 
  - speaking of awful ideas, subsidies for private health insurance  Blue State Blues   Jan-07-10 03:39 PM   #27 
  - This bill is just chock full of AWFUL IDEAS.  chimpymustgo   Jan-07-10 04:11 PM   #41 
     - What a looming backlash at the polls  indepat   Jan-07-10 04:42 PM   #46 
  - i'm thinking: KILL IT NOW...then implement my ONE PAGE, 5-para. health care refrom bill:  thotzRthingz   Jan-07-10 03:48 PM   #36 
  - There aren't enough rich to pay for it all  marshall   Jan-08-10 01:45 PM   #74 
     - the top 1% own 40% of the wealth, yes there is plenty of money just by taxing the rich  liberation   Jan-08-10 03:10 PM   #83 
        - We all have to pitch in and do our part  marshall   Jan-08-10 04:50 PM   #87 
           - You hit the nail on the head. "if something is worth doing"  county worker   Jan-08-10 06:58 PM   #92 
              - It's not us who will be getting more, it's those who have nothing who will get more  marshall   Jan-08-10 07:47 PM   #93 
  - Isn't that the justification for the mandate? nt  spoony   Jan-07-10 03:24 PM   #12 
  - Get rid of the health insurance industry's anti-trust exemption to create a market/ give a choice.  Captain Hilts   Jan-07-10 03:32 PM   #17 
  - How about taxing the rich instead?  Better Believe It   Jan-07-10 03:52 PM   #37 
  - It's meant to interfere with the kind of healthcare  sabrina 1   Jan-07-10 05:48 PM   #49 
  - I currently need a "subsidized" plan  mdmc   Jan-08-10 06:54 PM   #91 
  - The tax will trickle down and will generate opposition to HCR from an important demographic. nt  Captain Hilts   Jan-07-10 03:17 PM   #2 
  - I don't get insurance from work, yet I have to pay about 30% tax on all my income  no limit   Jan-07-10 03:20 PM   #3 
  - Because we, unfortunately, link health care with employment in this country.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-07-10 03:32 PM   #18 
     - But me paying taxes does not affect the employers. Taxing those benefits wouldn't either  no limit   Jan-07-10 03:53 PM   #38 
  - So how do we know  SoCalNative   Jan-07-10 03:20 PM   #4 
  - So the angst is that uin six years it will hit one in five middle class workers, if not adjusted?  dmallind   Jan-07-10 03:20 PM   #5 
  - K and R. This is indefensible. eom  Hello_Kitty   Jan-07-10 03:20 PM   #6 
  - Obama would rather tax the middle class lose the next election than tax his rich friends.  katandmoon   Jan-07-10 03:21 PM   #7 
  - Oh, I was beginning to think that we had one now.  emsimon33   Jan-07-10 03:24 PM   #13 
  - You're kidding right?! Have you even read the damn thing!?!?  uponit7771   Jan-07-10 03:39 PM   # 
  - What is WRONG with this man?....Who IS he?  whathehell   Jan-08-10 10:05 AM   #65 
  - Hard to argue with bullshit like that!  Egnever   Jan-07-10 03:22 PM   #8 
  - taxing the insurance co side of the equation  abelenkpe   Jan-07-10 03:29 PM   #14 
     - Because...  Egnever   Jan-07-10 03:36 PM   #23 
        - 85% of what dollars??? They will make an obscene profit somehow.  boston bean   Jan-07-10 04:18 PM   #44 
        - 85% is what they pay now  GinaMaria   Jan-08-10 01:48 PM   #75 
  - Instead of raising the criminal plans they will lower the better plans  boston bean   Jan-07-10 03:22 PM   #10 
  - It generates all the wrong incentives. nt  Captain Hilts   Jan-07-10 03:32 PM   #19 
  - The House plan is the one to go with  quinnox   Jan-07-10 03:23 PM   #11 
  - Right, because the text of the bill is spin. Oh, and you had to start your own thread because?  berni_mccoy   Jan-07-10 03:30 PM   #15 
  - Don't just read the bill, understand what it means and what will happen  boston bean   Jan-07-10 03:34 PM   #20 
  - Do you really hear yourself? "Don't Read The Bill?" No, you'd rather buy spin from the likes of FDL  berni_mccoy   Jan-07-10 03:36 PM   #21 
     - delete  uponit7771   Jan-07-10 03:40 PM   #29 
     - Well, it's quite clear who's misrepresenting and misinterpreting here.  chimpymustgo   Jan-07-10 03:42 PM   #31 
     - I didn't say, "don't read the bill", you ought to learn how to read. nt  boston bean   Jan-07-10 03:48 PM   #35 
     - -1 for invoking the bad scary FDL boogyman and for purposely distorting poster's words  ima_sinnic   Jan-07-10 04:24 PM   #45 
     - Have you answered my questions about how this bill HURTS union workers?  Kansas Wyatt   Jan-08-10 09:26 AM   #61 
        - Let's see, charter schools and many other anti-union  JDPriestly   Jan-08-10 02:01 PM   #77 
  - I've seen you start a thread today..  Fumesucker   Jan-07-10 03:36 PM   #22 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-10 03:37 PM   #24 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-10 03:39 PM   # 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-10 03:42 PM   #32 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-10 03:40 PM   #28 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-07-10 03:44 PM   #33 
  - This is both wrong and politically ignorant, if true. However it will not impact  mzmolly   Jan-07-10 03:30 PM   #16 
  - Deleted  uponit7771   Jan-07-10 03:38 PM   #25 
  - Including most of the authors quoted!  Egnever   Jan-07-10 03:39 PM   #26 
     - deleted and post unrec'd  uponit7771   Jan-07-10 03:42 PM   #30 
  - Hartmann explained it today  Doctor_J   Jan-07-10 03:44 PM   #34 
  - Want to lose a lot of (D) seats in 2010-2012? Pass this bill. (nt)  Ignis   Jan-07-10 04:01 PM   #39 
  - ...  tammywammy   Jan-07-10 04:11 PM   #40 
  - DLC , typically if pushed to choose between helping Big Business  OHdem10   Jan-07-10 04:12 PM   #42 
  - knr  Mari333   Jan-07-10 04:13 PM   #43 
  - K & R. The truth is out there.  freddie mertz   Jan-07-10 04:45 PM   #47 
  - Here's a very important piece of info that most people are not aware of:  inna   Jan-07-10 05:26 PM   #48 
  - Gay couples will be taxed at the $8,500 because they are not recognized as families  IndianaGreen   Jan-07-10 05:50 PM   #50 
  - My thoughts exactly. I'm a union member and believe my  Nordmadr   Jan-08-10 08:25 AM   #60 
  - If that is true, I was going by the  sabrina 1   Jan-08-10 04:30 PM   #86 
  - Obama has betrayed  femrap   Jan-07-10 07:20 PM   #51 
  - How do you screw UNIONS??? They are the BACKBONE of the party.  chimpymustgo   Jan-07-10 07:54 PM   #52 
     - That is an excellent question. The unions are dead set against this so called "cadillac" tax..  BrklynLiberal   Jan-07-10 09:55 PM   #55 
     - By taxing their 'Cadilac'  femrap   Jan-07-10 10:18 PM   #56 
     - Duh, that's the point of the OP. I'm asking, 'how in the world do you make the political  chimpymustgo   Jan-08-10 07:42 AM   #58 
        - This was the plan all along.  femrap   Jan-08-10 12:29 PM   #68 
           - I think I agree with you. Obama has been quite brazen in his paybacks to TPTB.  chimpymustgo   Jan-09-10 06:49 AM   #98 
              - I'm glad I didn't fall  femrap   Jan-09-10 09:37 AM   #99 
     - they traded the unions in for corporate money  fascisthunter   Jan-08-10 12:35 PM   #69 
  - The "Cadillac Tax" is a REPUBLICAN proposal.  bvar22   Jan-07-10 08:30 PM   #53 
  - From the beginning I think that was fairly obvious  sabrina 1   Jan-09-10 01:56 AM   #95 
  - K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R K&R  BrklynLiberal   Jan-07-10 09:54 PM   #54 
  - My health plan costs 50% of the threshold levels  high density   Jan-07-10 10:19 PM   #57 
  - How does Barack Obama sleep at night?  DisgustedInMN   Jan-08-10 07:55 AM   #59 
  - He got his  Missy Vixen   Jan-08-10 09:38 AM   #62 
     - I went door to door in RFK's campaign.  DisgustedInMN   Jan-08-10 09:45 AM   #63 
        - I wish we lived closer to each other  Missy Vixen   Jan-08-10 11:02 AM   #66 
           - Al Franken is..  DisgustedInMN   Jan-08-10 12:04 PM   #67 
  - Recommend  xchrom   Jan-08-10 09:55 AM   #64 
  - I thought the 'Cadillac Tax' would only affect those who make over 250/k year.  FarLeftFist   Jan-08-10 12:37 PM   #70 
  - K & R  AzDar   Jan-08-10 12:44 PM   #71 
  - 23K?  GinaMaria   Jan-08-10 01:36 PM   #72 
  - Oh my oh my. Such a complete chameleon our  bbgrunt   Jan-08-10 01:40 PM   #73 
  - Whoa, Nelly!  JDPriestly   Jan-08-10 01:55 PM   #76 
  - First, let me say I have always thought it wrong to tax health insurance.  Jackpine Radical   Jan-08-10 02:12 PM   #78 
     - You can set up an LLC if you are self-employed.  JDPriestly   Jan-08-10 03:05 PM   #81 
        - But I think you can set up a flexplan account  Jackpine Radical   Jan-08-10 03:09 PM   #82 
           - As that kind of plan was presented to me at the time,  JDPriestly   Jan-08-10 06:47 PM   #89 
           - Yes, you had to spend the amount in the account--  Jackpine Radical   Jan-08-10 09:19 PM   #94 
           - As that kind of plan was presented to me at the time,  JDPriestly   Jan-08-10 06:49 PM   #90 
  - What's wrong with going back to a pre-Reagan 70% tax on the Uber-rich?  grahamhgreen   Jan-08-10 03:00 PM   #79 
  - They will have to go from 10 vacation homes down to just 8, that is what's wrong!  liberation   Jan-08-10 03:14 PM   #84 
  - I've been saying this all along  RoccoR5955   Jan-08-10 03:04 PM   #80 
  - It means nothing to me  quaker bill   Jan-08-10 03:49 PM   #85 
  - I had another idea about how to pay for reform and it would generate  Vinca   Jan-08-10 04:59 PM   #88 
  - The House has a plan to tax those 500k and up  TheKentuckian   Jan-09-10 06:13 AM   #96 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-09-10 06:19 AM   #97 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC