You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #13: How many threads will be locked [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. How many threads will be locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -'I thought Obama would reverse the policies of the Bush administration' -Sen. Patrick Leahy rollingrock  Jan-03-10 06:28 PM   #0 
  - What did Bill Clinton do on landmines? Perhaps Obama is following the same policy as Bill, not  Pirate Smile   Jan-03-10 06:34 PM   #1 
  - How does that make the decision right?  timeforpeace   Jan-03-10 06:36 PM   #3 
  - Seeing it as similar to Clinton instead of Bush certainly gives it a different tinge, don't you  Pirate Smile   Jan-03-10 06:38 PM   #4 
     - Second verse, same as the first  donheld   Jan-03-10 09:23 PM   #47 
     - Yes and you choose to follow the military decision? nt  rhett o rick   Jan-03-10 10:28 PM   #60 
     - Disappointment with Obama's position on Landmines  youngharry   Jan-04-10 12:45 AM   #85 
     - I don't see it that way. Anyone responsible for something as evil  sabrina 1   Jan-04-10 01:32 AM   #87 
  - What's your point?  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 06:38 PM   #5 
  - I think people get a different impression from Obama = Clinton then they do from Obama = Bush.  Pirate Smile   Jan-03-10 06:40 PM   #6 
  - who wants another Clinton administration? I supported him in the primaries because I didn't.  FLAprogressive   Jan-03-10 07:05 PM   #15 
  - One vote that might have encouraged Leahy that Obama would do differently  karynnj   Jan-03-10 07:32 PM   #23 
  - WIN for impressive recall of senators' records.  burning rain   Jan-03-10 11:20 PM   #68 
  - That's a good article.  Major Hogwash   Jan-03-10 07:40 PM   #25 
  - The Obama administration is reviewing the policy and has not decided to continue Bush/Clinton  grantcart   Jan-03-10 09:07 PM   #46 
  - yes a full review. give me a break. That means nothing. nt  rhett o rick   Jan-03-10 10:29 PM   #61 
  - Using Korea as an example is similar to us using them between Canada and Mexican borders.  glowing   Jan-03-10 11:54 PM   #79 
  - valid point. thank you.....n/t  veganlush   Jan-03-10 10:01 PM   #55 
  - {{{{Spin}}}} n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Jan-03-10 10:29 PM   #62 
  - Barack is President... not Bill and not Hillary. Nice try though. I thought Barack was "change".  jesus_of_suburbia   Jan-03-10 10:41 PM   #64 
  - Two wrongs -  cartach   Jan-03-10 11:26 PM   #69 
  - Following a bad policy is still following a bad policy.  asdjrocky   Jan-03-10 11:46 PM   #74 
  - Yes, Leahy is disappointed in some of what Obama's doing  cali   Jan-03-10 06:36 PM   #2 
  - You're right  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 06:41 PM   #7 
  - so what, to you as well. you are disappointed in some things obama is doing, aren't you?? nt  boston bean   Jan-03-10 06:41 PM   #9 
     - yes I am but the OP is trying to use Leahy in a way that I know  cali   Jan-03-10 06:45 PM   #11 
        - The article seems to contradict that.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-03-10 07:29 PM   #22 
           - Leahy is disappointed with Obama on this specific issue  cali   Jan-03-10 07:39 PM   #24 
  - Silly Sen. Patrick Leahy  L0oniX   Jan-03-10 06:41 PM   #8 
  - The dread hands of the unreccers aren't happy, of course -- but Senator, a lot of us did.  villager   Jan-03-10 06:42 PM   # 
  - Hey unrecommenders...  Tesha   Jan-03-10 06:42 PM   #10 
  - I'll tell you why I did ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 07:17 PM   #16 
     - The repeated fabrications makes one wonder who's really behind all this "dissent"  guruoo   Jan-03-10 10:37 PM   #63 
     - Ditto  Cetacea   Jan-03-10 11:17 PM   #67 
     - Bingo on every point. TY, RoyGBiv. nt  Hekate   Jan-03-10 11:48 PM   #75 
  - Didn't we all?  RubyDuby in GA   Jan-03-10 06:46 PM   #12 
  - How many threads will be locked  sandnsea   Jan-03-10 06:47 PM   #13 
  - You're comparing this thread to obvious racial flamebait?  jgraz   Jan-03-10 09:01 PM   #44 
     - Same poster, Same purpose  sandnsea   Jan-03-10 09:25 PM   #48 
        - That's because I'm able to employ tactics other than ad hominem attacks  jgraz   Jan-03-10 09:32 PM   #50 
  - K&R.  timeforpeace   Jan-03-10 07:04 PM   #14 
  - Another teaching moment that Obama fucked up on.  Major Hogwash   Jan-03-10 07:22 PM   #17 
  - HE is a senator so he should get off his butt and start convincing his colleagues in the senate  stray cat   Jan-03-10 07:26 PM   #18 
  - At the very least we expected Obama to uphold the US Constitution. nt  glitch   Jan-03-10 07:26 PM   #19 
  - Geez, what a Leftbagger.  Hello_Kitty   Jan-03-10 07:27 PM   #20 
  - Senator Leahy's Actual Comments  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 07:28 PM   #21 
  - Amazing what a difference the ACTUAL words of Senator Leahy make when you read them.  Hekate   Jan-03-10 11:53 PM   #78 
     - One thing I thought very important ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-04-10 12:17 AM   #83 
  - Leahy on health care reform  ProSense   Jan-03-10 07:52 PM   #26 
  - So Leahy is happy with a healthcare bill  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:03 PM   #27 
     - You're the one misquoting Leahy to satisfy your agenda. n/t  ProSense   Jan-03-10 08:06 PM   #28 
     - Where did I misquote him?  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:11 PM   #30 
     - You don't get it both ways ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 08:09 PM   #29 
        - I'm quoting from two credible sources  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:16 PM   #31 
           - The statement in your subject is not a quote ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 08:19 PM   #32 
           - What do you think this means?  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:22 PM   #34 
              - As noted ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 08:28 PM   #36 
           - You are not misquoting him you are changing the context.  grantcart   Jan-03-10 08:20 PM   #33 
              - The keyword here is 'policies'  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:24 PM   #35 
              - Actually, he is misquoting him ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 08:32 PM   #37 
                 - You assume that the news source  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 08:44 PM   #40 
                    - No ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 08:47 PM   #41 
                       - The news source got it right  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 09:01 PM   #43 
                       - Just so we're clear ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 09:25 PM   #49 
                          - If you disagree or don't believe the source is telling the truth  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 09:42 PM   #52 
                             - Not crying ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-03-10 11:27 PM   #70 
                                - Don't presume that your opinion is the only one that counts  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 11:52 PM   #76 
                                   - Look ...  RoyGBiv   Jan-04-10 12:09 AM   #82 
                       - You are correct  CLANG   Jan-03-10 10:11 PM   #58 
  - ICBL very pleased that Obama administration is committed to "review of policy"  grantcart   Jan-03-10 08:35 PM   #38 
  - Isn't that amazing. First someone posts what Leahy actually said, then you post what ICBL actually  Hekate   Jan-03-10 11:56 PM   #80 
  - K&R.  Vidar   Jan-03-10 08:44 PM   #39 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-10 08:48 PM   #42 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-03-10 09:35 PM   #51 
  - KNR  amborin   Jan-03-10 09:05 PM   #45 
  - K&R....  unkachuck   Jan-03-10 09:45 PM   #53 
  - why oh why?  spanone   Jan-03-10 09:48 PM   #54 
  - YAwn. The landmine bullshit in this post is already  cliffordu   Jan-03-10 10:03 PM   #56 
  - There is a little problem called Korea  tritsofme   Jan-03-10 10:09 PM   #57 
  - What for?  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 10:19 PM   #59 
  - The Ottawa Treaty would require the US to remove mines near the Korea DMZ  tritsofme   Jan-03-10 10:49 PM   #65 
     - Sorry, but that's a bogus argument  rollingrock   Jan-03-10 11:15 PM   #66 
     - I doubt North Korea would be so foolish enough to do that without permission from Beijing.  Selatius   Jan-03-10 11:52 PM   #77 
        - North Korea is entirely dependent on China aid  rollingrock   Jan-04-10 12:09 AM   #81 
  - There is a bigger problem...  Andronex   Jan-04-10 01:21 AM   #86 
  - "Committed to a review" is now an accomplishment. So, I welcome this  change_notfinetuning   Jan-03-10 11:30 PM   #71 
  - We could just bitch or we could bitch AND do something about it  jbnow   Jan-03-10 11:42 PM   #72 
  - When Obama says he's undertaking a "comprehensive policy review" it usually means good things ...  Hekate   Jan-03-10 11:43 PM   #73 
  - Hekate....  democrank   Jan-04-10 04:11 AM   #89 
  - K & R  democracy1st   Jan-04-10 12:20 AM   #84 
  - Who does the Pentagon buy these landmines from?  zoff   Jan-04-10 03:14 AM   #88 
  - *****ANOTHER ANTI OBAMA POST******: Landmine issue comprehensive policy review  uponit7771   Jan-04-10 04:22 AM   #90 
  - locking  maddezmom   Jan-04-10 05:43 AM   #91 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC