Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-31-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. I guess the majorities in polls who don't think it will help them are right. eom |
| -Serious question: What does the HCR bill do for people who have insurance through their employers? |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 04:49 PM |
#0 |
 -
Isn't taxing employer-based insurance plans enough? |
Nikki Stone1 |
Dec-31-09 04:50 PM |
#1 |
 -
Only very high-end plans are subject to tax. There is another change |
quiller4 |
Dec-31-09 04:55 PM |
#2 |
| -
the "very high-end plans" that labor took in exchange for pay concessions for years. |
Bluebear |
Dec-31-09 04:56 PM |
#3 |
| -
Projected to be 20% of employee sponsored plans by 2019. |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 04:59 PM |
#7 |
 -
yep. That's what has happened to us. My employer offers 3 plans |
AllyCat |
Dec-31-09 09:23 PM |
#24 |
| -
But why should anyone have tax free insurance plans |
truedelphi |
Jan-01-10 03:26 AM |
#25 |
| -
Taxing health benefits is immoral and unethical. It's like taxing food. |
AllyCat |
Jan-01-10 04:00 AM |
#26 |
| -
Oh I agree. Sorry if my sarcasm |
truedelphi |
Jan-01-10 03:54 PM |
#28 |
| -
Ok! Thanks. Internet is so flat that I didn't catch it |
AllyCat |
Jan-01-10 07:36 PM |
#29 |
| -
As someone who jsut misread the header |
truedelphi |
Jan-02-10 02:37 AM |
#34 |
| -
That;s the "cost-cutting" angle: forcing people into cheaper plans where |
Hannah Bell |
Jan-01-10 04:51 AM |
#27 |
| -
No they can't! |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 04:57 PM |
#5 |
| -
Define "Very high end plan". |
Nikki Stone1 |
Dec-31-09 04:58 PM |
#6 |
| -
It is defined by the cost of the premium |
laughingliberal |
Dec-31-09 05:03 PM |
#9 |
| -
I don't think so about being able to buy from the exchange. |
clear eye |
Dec-31-09 05:00 PM |
#8 |
| -
The reason its called very high end is because it cannot be denied. |
Kokonoe |
Dec-31-09 05:48 PM |
#18 |
| -
About $8,000 individual, $21,000 family is considered a high end plan |
jmm |
Jan-01-10 10:19 PM |
#32 |
| -
Oh yeah. And you know it will be in the final bill. |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 04:56 PM |
#4 |
| -
As far as I can tell, no, unless the premium is greater than 9.8 percent... |
Cleobulus |
Dec-31-09 05:10 PM |
#10 |
| -
I guess the majorities in polls who don't think it will help them are right. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 05:11 PM |
#11 |
| -
And I have a question - IF we somehow get a Public Option, my niece, who is |
gateley |
Dec-31-09 05:13 PM |
#12 |
| -
They have talked about doing this where I work |
proud2BlibKansan |
Dec-31-09 05:32 PM |
#15 |
| -
I know -- When I was working I never grumbled too much about my increasing |
gateley |
Dec-31-09 08:44 PM |
#22 |
| -
She's got it wrong, but the reality may not be much better depending on |
clear eye |
Dec-31-09 07:30 PM |
#20 |
| -
Boy, thanks for the education! Now I get it, and I'll pass it along. There isn't |
gateley |
Dec-31-09 08:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
Why would they need a public option to do that? Why wouldn't they just do it yesterday? |
recoveringrepublican |
Jan-01-10 09:59 PM |
#31 |
| -
...... |
LouKneeLib |
Dec-31-09 05:14 PM |
#13 |
| -
There are new regulations that insurance companies operate under. |
dhpgetsit |
Dec-31-09 05:29 PM |
#14 |
| -
Okay, that's good. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-31-09 05:39 PM |
#16 |
| -
A few. |
Igel |
Dec-31-09 05:47 PM |
#17 |
| -
It reduces uncompensated care |
quaker bill |
Dec-31-09 05:52 PM |
#19 |
| -
just a note regarding U.S. Armed Forces, Veterans, Retirees (on TRICARE)... |
thotzRthingz |
Dec-31-09 09:05 PM |
#23 |
| -
What I don't get is the rationale for... |
WillowTree |
Jan-01-10 09:10 PM |
#30 |
| -
CWA Presents 18 Studies Outlining Negative Effects of Excise Tax |
IndianaGreen |
Jan-01-10 10:22 PM |
#33 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread