You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: kick [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -That's all they had to do. cornermouse  Dec-28-09 03:40 PM   #0 
  - Bipartisan?  FLDCVADem   Dec-28-09 03:41 PM   #1 
  - That isn't true exactly  Horse with no Name   Dec-29-09 05:05 AM   #6 
     - They were hoping for Snowe or Collins  WonderGrunion   Dec-29-09 06:01 AM   #10 
     - and your post isn't true either  cali   Dec-29-09 07:10 AM   #12 
        - The only item in the shit bill even worth the ink.  MNDemNY   Dec-29-09 07:28 AM   #13 
        - and that didn't happen until late in the game - so YOUR post is disingenuous  Donnachaidh   Dec-29-09 08:57 AM   #17 
        - 900 billion dollar expenditure does not justify a 10 billion dollar program  TheKentuckian   Dec-29-09 02:22 PM   #22 
  - Great OP  proud2BlibKansan   Dec-28-09 03:42 PM   #2 
  - kick  cornermouse   Dec-29-09 04:13 AM   #3 
  - It's the conserva-Dems killing the "traditional democratic principles" that you  Better Today   Dec-29-09 05:00 AM   #4 
  - Sure. Ask Joe (I-Aetna) Lieberman.  denem   Dec-29-09 05:03 AM   #5 
  - They never fought for it.  cornermouse   Dec-29-09 05:09 AM   #7 
     - They could have shouted it publicly, and got Mr Integrity's back up,  denem   Dec-29-09 05:14 AM   #8 
     - They could have even hit the Republicans over their lockstep conformity  JHB   Dec-29-09 08:33 AM   #16 
  - G.Carlin's take on it: "Bipartisan = a larger than usual deception is being carried out."  Echo In Light   Dec-29-09 05:57 AM   #9 
  - "60" isn't now nor has it EVER been needed.  DisgustedInMN   Dec-29-09 07:06 AM   #11 
  - Yes it is. Get your facts straight.  TheWraith   Dec-29-09 02:12 PM   #20 
  - Agree 100%  JoeyT   Dec-29-09 07:57 AM   #14 
  - Exactly.  cornermouse   Dec-29-09 03:42 PM   #24 
  - K & R  Dinger   Dec-29-09 08:00 AM   #15 
  - It would be so much better if you were in high office  treestar   Dec-29-09 08:59 AM   #18 
  - The bipartisanship claim is bogus. The Republicans wouldn't support  mmonk   Dec-29-09 09:03 AM   #19 
  - So your solution is simply to lose, give up, and go home?  TheWraith   Dec-29-09 02:14 PM   #21 
  - The problem is the bill we got doesn't solve any of those issues  TheKentuckian   Dec-29-09 02:32 PM   #23 
  - K&R  Tashca   Dec-29-09 03:58 PM   #25 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC