You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOUND IT. The fake "JFK" photo source, Playboy, November 1967 (PHOTO) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 12:04 PM
Original message
FOUND IT. The fake "JFK" photo source, Playboy, November 1967 (PHOTO)
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 12:27 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
"Playboy's Charter Yacht Party." Now you know. Aged, wrinkled, converted to B&W in Photoshop, and NOT JFK:




:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -FOUND IT. The fake "JFK" photo source, Playboy, November 1967 (PHOTO) Amerigo Vespucci  Dec-28-09 12:04 PM   #0 
  - Thanks for the info.  harun   Dec-28-09 12:07 PM   #1 
  - I really don't see why anyone would think it was fake.  goldcanyonaz   Dec-28-09 12:08 PM   #2 
  - Me either  Stuckinthebush   Dec-28-09 12:17 PM   #6 
  - Me neither  FreakinDJ   Dec-28-09 12:42 PM   #36 
  - The Posthumous Assassination of JFK  Octafish   Dec-28-09 05:33 PM   #93 
     - The Posthumous Assassination of JFK - Part I & II  MinM   Dec-28-09 06:48 PM   #96 
        - Photo that actually sunk a political career...  MinM   Dec-30-09 10:04 AM   #107 
           - Gary Hart and Richard Schweiker pushed The Church Committee to review the JFK...  MinM   Dec-31-09 01:29 PM   #108 
  - Well, first of all, if it is a pic of Kennedy, so what  MadHound   Dec-28-09 12:09 PM   #3 
  - So you're going to be thumbing through old Playboys...  Jeff In Milwaukee   Dec-28-09 12:19 PM   #7 
  - +1  phasma ex machina   Dec-28-09 01:31 PM   #69 
  - It isn't a pic of Kennedy. See above.  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:28 PM   #12 
  - JFK  TicketyBoo   Dec-28-09 01:41 PM   #73 
  - ahem...  druidity33   Dec-29-09 06:14 AM   #104 
  - memory working good there  HughMoran   Dec-28-09 12:09 PM   #4 
  - So many sexually deviant republicans have been exposed that they will  Lint Head   Dec-28-09 12:13 PM   #5 
  - Yes, at least Democratic scandals involve ADULTS!  CoffeeCat   Dec-28-09 12:20 PM   #8 
     - And women!  jmowreader   Dec-28-09 01:30 PM   #68 
  - Since everyone is strategically posed to hide pubic hair, look for pre-1972-3  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-28-09 12:21 PM   #9 
  - Playboy identified it: 1967  Kurt_and_Hunter   Dec-28-09 12:23 PM   #10 
  - So did I. See above.  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:29 PM   #13 
  - I would like to think JFK was on a Playboy yacht in 1967.  aquart   Dec-28-09 12:33 PM   #18 
  - And every person had tons of pubic hair in that era!  Ter   Dec-28-09 12:50 PM   #42 
  - delete  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:25 PM   #11 
  - Taken from nearby yacht or other large vessel , another giveaway.  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:30 PM   #14 
  - The hair on the man or the women didn't look right, either. nt  blondeatlast   Dec-28-09 12:32 PM   #15 
  - Send it to tmz.  LisaL   Dec-28-09 12:32 PM   #16 
  - They just updated their story...  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:36 PM   #23 
     - Call them up ASAP. They might even pay you for a copy.  LisaL   Dec-28-09 12:37 PM   #24 
     - Charg them 5k and donate the money to Skinners Homeless Charity  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:39 PM   #28 
     - Or any charity of your choice!  LisaL   Dec-28-09 12:39 PM   #29 
        - +1!  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:40 PM   #31 
     - Because they might give you munny  blogslut   Dec-28-09 12:44 PM   #39 
     - See? Someone already stole your image!  blogslut   Dec-28-09 02:22 PM   #81 
        - Well, even though he referred to me as "someone," at least he gave DU credit...  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 03:26 PM   #85 
           - That credit to you is new  blogslut   Dec-28-09 03:30 PM   #86 
           - I just checked again; the credit is gone.  blondeatlast   Dec-28-09 08:02 PM   #98 
              - It's there  blogslut   Dec-28-09 09:52 PM   #100 
           - So he swiped your image and refers to you as "someone" - how thoughtful.  myrna minx   Dec-28-09 06:31 PM   #95 
     - Sell it to them you fool  anigbrowl   Dec-28-09 12:51 PM   #43 
     - Freaking brilliant  malaise   Dec-28-09 05:32 PM   #92 
  - Ha Ha - I told you guys so  FreakinDJ   Dec-28-09 12:33 PM   #17 
  - The pic is not JFK,,,,but that was not your original argument  AnOhioan   Dec-28-09 12:38 PM   #26 
     - The pic is 1967 - that was my original arguement  FreakinDJ   Dec-28-09 12:41 PM   #33 
        - Nice try...but no cigar  AnOhioan   Dec-28-09 12:43 PM   #37 
        - Yeah, it was his SECOND SENTENCE.  Occulus   Dec-28-09 12:59 PM   #50 
        - Your memory is faulty  Individualist   Dec-28-09 01:08 PM   #56 
  - So, how did you get the assigment to search all the back issues of Playboy?  FSogol   Dec-28-09 12:34 PM   #19 
  - Just lucky I guess  FreakinDJ   Dec-28-09 01:19 PM   #62 
  - Nice find,  dhpgetsit   Dec-28-09 12:34 PM   #20 
  - FauxNews fell for it, too!!! Har, har...  HardWorkingDem   Dec-28-09 12:34 PM   #21 
  - Good! lol.  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:41 PM   #34 
  - In this case it's FAUXNews but generally everyone in the media runs with ANY story prematurely..nt  Blasphemer   Dec-28-09 01:06 PM   #55 
  - what is this in reference to?  Kali   Dec-28-09 12:36 PM   #22 
  - Someone took the photo I posted above...  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:38 PM   #27 
     - Which should give us an indication of how seriously the right wing takes their  defendandprotect   Dec-28-09 01:14 PM   #58 
     - Thanks. It smelled like a brand new M$M pseudo scandal stinking up the thread. nt  phasma ex machina   Dec-28-09 01:35 PM   #70 
  - HAHAHAHAHA!  WeDidIt   Dec-28-09 12:37 PM   #25 
  - They know...they just haven't gotten their hands on the original...  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:39 PM   #30 
  - Color photos in 1950s?  proud2BlibKansan   Dec-28-09 12:40 PM   #32 
  - The photo was from 1967  WeDidIt   Dec-28-09 12:42 PM   #35 
  - Exactly  proud2BlibKansan   Dec-28-09 01:00 PM   #51 
  - November 1967 issue of Playboy (see above)...NOT a 50s pic.  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 12:43 PM   #38 
  - Sorry I wasn't clear  proud2BlibKansan   Dec-28-09 01:00 PM   #52 
     - earlier than that...  druidity33   Dec-29-09 06:27 AM   #105 
  - Yes, color photography has been around a long time.  RebelOne   Dec-29-09 06:43 AM   #106 
  - Recced for greyed out boobies. nt  Yuugal   Dec-28-09 12:45 PM   #40 
  - rec'd for the word 'boobies'  tomm2thumbs   Dec-28-09 01:20 PM   #63 
  - LOL. 53 related articles on Google News.  Cetacea   Dec-28-09 12:47 PM   #41 
  - But..but..Professor Jeff Sedlik says it's REAL....  Junkdrawer   Dec-28-09 12:51 PM   #44 
  - I have to wonder if Professor Jeff Sedlik is real--and if his resume is up to date... nt  blondeatlast   Dec-28-09 12:57 PM   #49 
  - Oh, he's real...but his career just tanked...  Junkdrawer   Dec-28-09 01:02 PM   #54 
     - Could be the hoax is older than we think  blogslut   Dec-28-09 01:38 PM   #71 
     - Not really  HmmWellDone   Dec-28-09 02:16 PM   #80 
        - Thank you, Professor Sedlik. n/t  the blues   Dec-28-09 05:12 PM   #90 
        - What's that I smell?  EvolveOrConvolve   Jan-03-10 07:55 PM   #110 
  - That expert just lost his charm  merh   Dec-28-09 02:45 PM   #83 
  - I would have bet money it was a fake. the hair on the women is too long  blondeatlast   Dec-28-09 12:51 PM   #45 
  - K&R nice job, Amerigo.  Soylent Brice   Dec-28-09 12:51 PM   #46 
  - With luck, this will put that shitty rumor mill, TMZ out of business.  Stinky The Clown   Dec-28-09 12:53 PM   #47 
  - What's TMZ . . . ???  defendandprotect   Dec-28-09 01:15 PM   #59 
     - A web site that publishes all manner of celebrity gossip, pictures, and bullshit.  Stinky The Clown   Dec-28-09 01:26 PM   #64 
  - Good work!  crispini   Dec-28-09 12:55 PM   #48 
  - I had it...  Amerigo Vespucci   Dec-28-09 01:29 PM   #67 
  - Good job! Why bother doing this with a published photo?  Blasphemer   Dec-28-09 01:01 PM   #53 
  - So many old Playboy issues, so lil time! n/t  truedelphi   Dec-28-09 01:11 PM   #57 
  - I love hoaxes...and as this one goes it is a good one  AngryAmish   Dec-28-09 01:16 PM   #60 
  - TMZ fell for it, hook line and... well you know the rest  tomm2thumbs   Dec-28-09 01:19 PM   #61 
  - Isn't TMZ another media owned by Ruppert Murdoch?  Cleita   Dec-28-09 01:28 PM   #65 
     - Actually  blogslut   Dec-28-09 01:43 PM   #74 
     - HAAAAAAAAA HAHAHA hahahahaaaaaaa... TMZ = Total Moron Zone...  johnfunk   Dec-28-09 02:01 PM   #77 
        - Okay  blogslut   Dec-28-09 02:06 PM   #79 
     - I think they have a picture of Abe Lincoln eating a Dolly Madison jelly roll  tomm2thumbs   Dec-28-09 01:44 PM   #75 
     - Re: Isn't TMZ another media owned by Ruppert Murdoch?  MinM   Jan-03-10 07:40 PM   #109 
  - Golly I expected so much more journalistic integrity from TMZ,  progressoid   Dec-28-09 01:29 PM   #66 
  - Oooooh shit!  HughMoran   Dec-28-09 01:41 PM   #72 
  - I'm sorry but....  chowder66   Dec-28-09 01:58 PM   #76 
  - The phony photo appeared to be a b&w photo.  intheflow   Dec-28-09 02:42 PM   #82 
  - Too bad this came to light before OxyRush went on the air re the bogus pic.  lpbk2713   Dec-28-09 02:03 PM   #78 
  - Link to the TMZ correction -Kennedy Picture -- A Fake  merh   Dec-28-09 03:01 PM   #84 
  - Classic!  depakid   Dec-28-09 05:18 PM   #91 
  - Geeeezzz... thank God I can laugh 'coz otherwise stupid like that would be  blondeatlast   Dec-28-09 08:07 PM   #99 
     - I know, that comment had me in tears.  merh   Dec-28-09 10:44 PM   #102 
  - Good job!  Liberal In Texas   Dec-28-09 03:46 PM   #87 
  - STUPID question...  laylah   Dec-28-09 03:47 PM   #88 
  - The guy that TMZ claimed was JFK  merh   Dec-28-09 07:07 PM   #97 
  - 15 years of working in print and photo manipulation and I can tell its a fake in 10 secs  Brundle_Fly   Dec-28-09 04:42 PM   #89 
  - Hahahahahah  malaise   Dec-28-09 05:36 PM   #94 
  - When I saw that article over on HuffPo today, my first thought was "Damn, I missed all the fun!"  bertman   Dec-28-09 10:43 PM   #101 
  - Here's the original  Ter   Dec-29-09 01:59 AM   #103 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC