Amerigo Vespucci
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 12:04 PM
Original message |
| FOUND IT. The fake "JFK" photo source, Playboy, November 1967 (PHOTO) |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 12:27 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
"Playboy's Charter Yacht Party." Now you know. Aged, wrinkled, converted to B&W in Photoshop, and NOT JFK: 
|
| -FOUND IT. The fake "JFK" photo source, Playboy, November 1967 (PHOTO) |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:04 PM |
#0 |
-
Thanks for the info. |
harun |
Dec-28-09 12:07 PM |
#1 |
-
I really don't see why anyone would think it was fake. |
goldcanyonaz |
Dec-28-09 12:08 PM |
#2 |
 -
Me either |
Stuckinthebush |
Dec-28-09 12:17 PM |
#6 |
 -
Me neither |
FreakinDJ |
Dec-28-09 12:42 PM |
#36 |
 -
The Posthumous Assassination of JFK |
Octafish |
Dec-28-09 05:33 PM |
#93 |
-
The Posthumous Assassination of JFK - Part I & II |
MinM |
Dec-28-09 06:48 PM |
#96 |
-
Photo that actually sunk a political career... |
MinM |
Dec-30-09 10:04 AM |
#107 |
-
Gary Hart and Richard Schweiker pushed The Church Committee to review the JFK... |
MinM |
Dec-31-09 01:29 PM |
#108 |
-
Well, first of all, if it is a pic of Kennedy, so what |
MadHound |
Dec-28-09 12:09 PM |
#3 |
 -
So you're going to be thumbing through old Playboys... |
Jeff In Milwaukee |
Dec-28-09 12:19 PM |
#7 |
  -
+1 |
phasma ex machina |
Dec-28-09 01:31 PM |
#69 |
 -
It isn't a pic of Kennedy. See above. |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:28 PM |
#12 |
 -
JFK |
TicketyBoo |
Dec-28-09 01:41 PM |
#73 |
 -
ahem... |
druidity33 |
Dec-29-09 06:14 AM |
#104 |
-
memory working good there |
HughMoran |
Dec-28-09 12:09 PM |
#4 |
-
So many sexually deviant republicans have been exposed that they will |
Lint Head |
Dec-28-09 12:13 PM |
#5 |
 -
Yes, at least Democratic scandals involve ADULTS! |
CoffeeCat |
Dec-28-09 12:20 PM |
#8 |
-
And women! |
jmowreader |
Dec-28-09 01:30 PM |
#68 |
-
Since everyone is strategically posed to hide pubic hair, look for pre-1972-3 |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Dec-28-09 12:21 PM |
#9 |
 -
Playboy identified it: 1967 |
Kurt_and_Hunter |
Dec-28-09 12:23 PM |
#10 |
  -
So did I. See above. |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:29 PM |
#13 |
  -
I would like to think JFK was on a Playboy yacht in 1967. |
aquart |
Dec-28-09 12:33 PM |
#18 |
 -
And every person had tons of pubic hair in that era! |
Ter |
Dec-28-09 12:50 PM |
#42 |
-
delete |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:25 PM |
#11 |
-
Taken from nearby yacht or other large vessel , another giveaway. |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:30 PM |
#14 |
-
The hair on the man or the women didn't look right, either. nt |
blondeatlast |
Dec-28-09 12:32 PM |
#15 |
-
Send it to tmz. |
LisaL |
Dec-28-09 12:32 PM |
#16 |
 -
They just updated their story... |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:36 PM |
#23 |
-
Call them up ASAP. They might even pay you for a copy. |
LisaL |
Dec-28-09 12:37 PM |
#24 |
-
Charg them 5k and donate the money to Skinners Homeless Charity |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:39 PM |
#28 |
 -
Or any charity of your choice! |
LisaL |
Dec-28-09 12:39 PM |
#29 |
-
+1! |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:40 PM |
#31 |
-
Because they might give you munny |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 12:44 PM |
#39 |
 -
See? Someone already stole your image! |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 02:22 PM |
#81 |
-
Well, even though he referred to me as "someone," at least he gave DU credit... |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 03:26 PM |
#85 |
-
That credit to you is new |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 03:30 PM |
#86 |
 -
I just checked again; the credit is gone. |
blondeatlast |
Dec-28-09 08:02 PM |
#98 |
-
It's there |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 09:52 PM |
#100 |
-
So he swiped your image and refers to you as "someone" - how thoughtful. |
myrna minx |
Dec-28-09 06:31 PM |
#95 |
-
Sell it to them you fool |
anigbrowl |
Dec-28-09 12:51 PM |
#43 |
-
Freaking brilliant |
malaise |
Dec-28-09 05:32 PM |
#92 |
-
Ha Ha - I told you guys so |
FreakinDJ |
Dec-28-09 12:33 PM |
#17 |
 -
The pic is not JFK,,,,but that was not your original argument |
AnOhioan |
Dec-28-09 12:38 PM |
#26 |
-
The pic is 1967 - that was my original arguement |
FreakinDJ |
Dec-28-09 12:41 PM |
#33 |
-
Nice try...but no cigar |
AnOhioan |
Dec-28-09 12:43 PM |
#37 |
 -
Yeah, it was his SECOND SENTENCE. |
Occulus |
Dec-28-09 12:59 PM |
#50 |
-
Your memory is faulty |
Individualist |
Dec-28-09 01:08 PM |
#56 |
-
So, how did you get the assigment to search all the back issues of Playboy? |
FSogol |
Dec-28-09 12:34 PM |
#19 |
 -
Just lucky I guess |
FreakinDJ |
Dec-28-09 01:19 PM |
#62 |
-
Nice find, |
dhpgetsit |
Dec-28-09 12:34 PM |
#20 |
-
FauxNews fell for it, too!!! Har, har... |
HardWorkingDem |
Dec-28-09 12:34 PM |
#21 |
 -
Good! lol. |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:41 PM |
#34 |
 -
In this case it's FAUXNews but generally everyone in the media runs with ANY story prematurely..nt |
Blasphemer |
Dec-28-09 01:06 PM |
#55 |
-
what is this in reference to? |
Kali |
Dec-28-09 12:36 PM |
#22 |
 -
Someone took the photo I posted above... |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:38 PM |
#27 |
-
Which should give us an indication of how seriously the right wing takes their |
defendandprotect |
Dec-28-09 01:14 PM |
#58 |
-
Thanks. It smelled like a brand new M$M pseudo scandal stinking up the thread. nt |
phasma ex machina |
Dec-28-09 01:35 PM |
#70 |
-
HAHAHAHAHA! |
WeDidIt |
Dec-28-09 12:37 PM |
#25 |
 -
They know...they just haven't gotten their hands on the original... |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:39 PM |
#30 |
-
Color photos in 1950s? |
proud2BlibKansan |
Dec-28-09 12:40 PM |
#32 |
 -
The photo was from 1967 |
WeDidIt |
Dec-28-09 12:42 PM |
#35 |
  -
Exactly |
proud2BlibKansan |
Dec-28-09 01:00 PM |
#51 |
 -
November 1967 issue of Playboy (see above)...NOT a 50s pic. |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 12:43 PM |
#38 |
  -
Sorry I wasn't clear |
proud2BlibKansan |
Dec-28-09 01:00 PM |
#52 |
 -
earlier than that... |
druidity33 |
Dec-29-09 06:27 AM |
#105 |
 -
Yes, color photography has been around a long time. |
RebelOne |
Dec-29-09 06:43 AM |
#106 |
-
Recced for greyed out boobies. nt |
Yuugal |
Dec-28-09 12:45 PM |
#40 |
 -
rec'd for the word 'boobies' |
tomm2thumbs |
Dec-28-09 01:20 PM |
#63 |
-
LOL. 53 related articles on Google News. |
Cetacea |
Dec-28-09 12:47 PM |
#41 |
-
But..but..Professor Jeff Sedlik says it's REAL.... |
Junkdrawer |
Dec-28-09 12:51 PM |
#44 |
 -
I have to wonder if Professor Jeff Sedlik is real--and if his resume is up to date... nt |
blondeatlast |
Dec-28-09 12:57 PM |
#49 |
  -
Oh, he's real...but his career just tanked... |
Junkdrawer |
Dec-28-09 01:02 PM |
#54 |
 -
Could be the hoax is older than we think |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 01:38 PM |
#71 |
 -
Not really |
HmmWellDone |
Dec-28-09 02:16 PM |
#80 |
 -
Thank you, Professor Sedlik. n/t |
the blues |
Dec-28-09 05:12 PM |
#90 |
 -
What's that I smell? |
EvolveOrConvolve |
Jan-03-10 07:55 PM |
#110 |
 -
That expert just lost his charm |
merh |
Dec-28-09 02:45 PM |
#83 |
-
I would have bet money it was a fake. the hair on the women is too long |
blondeatlast |
Dec-28-09 12:51 PM |
#45 |
-
K&R nice job, Amerigo. |
Soylent Brice |
Dec-28-09 12:51 PM |
#46 |
-
With luck, this will put that shitty rumor mill, TMZ out of business. |
Stinky The Clown |
Dec-28-09 12:53 PM |
#47 |
 -
What's TMZ . . . ??? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-28-09 01:15 PM |
#59 |
-
A web site that publishes all manner of celebrity gossip, pictures, and bullshit. |
Stinky The Clown |
Dec-28-09 01:26 PM |
#64 |
-
Good work! |
crispini |
Dec-28-09 12:55 PM |
#48 |
 -
I had it... |
Amerigo Vespucci |
Dec-28-09 01:29 PM |
#67 |
-
Good job! Why bother doing this with a published photo? |
Blasphemer |
Dec-28-09 01:01 PM |
#53 |
-
So many old Playboy issues, so lil time! n/t |
truedelphi |
Dec-28-09 01:11 PM |
#57 |
-
I love hoaxes...and as this one goes it is a good one |
AngryAmish |
Dec-28-09 01:16 PM |
#60 |
-
TMZ fell for it, hook line and... well you know the rest |
tomm2thumbs |
Dec-28-09 01:19 PM |
#61 |
 -
Isn't TMZ another media owned by Ruppert Murdoch? |
Cleita |
Dec-28-09 01:28 PM |
#65 |
-
Actually |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 01:43 PM |
#74 |
 -
HAAAAAAAAA HAHAHA hahahahaaaaaaa... TMZ = Total Moron Zone... |
johnfunk |
Dec-28-09 02:01 PM |
#77 |
-
Okay |
blogslut |
Dec-28-09 02:06 PM |
#79 |
-
I think they have a picture of Abe Lincoln eating a Dolly Madison jelly roll |
tomm2thumbs |
Dec-28-09 01:44 PM |
#75 |
-
Re: Isn't TMZ another media owned by Ruppert Murdoch? |
MinM |
Jan-03-10 07:40 PM |
#109 |
-
Golly I expected so much more journalistic integrity from TMZ, |
progressoid |
Dec-28-09 01:29 PM |
#66 |
-
Oooooh shit! |
HughMoran |
Dec-28-09 01:41 PM |
#72 |
-
I'm sorry but.... |
chowder66 |
Dec-28-09 01:58 PM |
#76 |
 -
The phony photo appeared to be a b&w photo. |
intheflow |
Dec-28-09 02:42 PM |
#82 |
-
Too bad this came to light before OxyRush went on the air re the bogus pic. |
lpbk2713 |
Dec-28-09 02:03 PM |
#78 |
-
Link to the TMZ correction -Kennedy Picture -- A Fake |
merh |
Dec-28-09 03:01 PM |
#84 |
 -
Classic! |
depakid |
Dec-28-09 05:18 PM |
#91 |
 -
Geeeezzz... thank God I can laugh 'coz otherwise stupid like that would be |
blondeatlast |
Dec-28-09 08:07 PM |
#99 |
-
I know, that comment had me in tears. |
merh |
Dec-28-09 10:44 PM |
#102 |
-
Good job! |
Liberal In Texas |
Dec-28-09 03:46 PM |
#87 |
-
STUPID question... |
laylah |
Dec-28-09 03:47 PM |
#88 |
 -
The guy that TMZ claimed was JFK |
merh |
Dec-28-09 07:07 PM |
#97 |
-
15 years of working in print and photo manipulation and I can tell its a fake in 10 secs |
Brundle_Fly |
Dec-28-09 04:42 PM |
#89 |
-
Hahahahahah |
malaise |
Dec-28-09 05:36 PM |
#94 |
-
When I saw that article over on HuffPo today, my first thought was "Damn, I missed all the fun!" |
bertman |
Dec-28-09 10:43 PM |
#101 |
-
Here's the original |
Ter |
Dec-29-09 01:59 AM |
#103 |