You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #49: post it 100 times [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
49. post it 100 times
it's that important
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Repost: In Silence, Obama & the Supreme Court imperil Human Liberty with a Sentence debbierlus  Dec-26-09 09:24 PM   #0 
  - Not enough attention paid the first time you posted this?  WeDidIt   Dec-26-09 09:27 PM   #1 
  - You should be ashamed for that statement.  madfloridian   Dec-26-09 09:34 PM   #9 
  - Thanks friend:)  debbierlus   Dec-26-09 09:34 PM   #11 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Dec-26-09 09:37 PM   #15 
  - +1 nt  laughingliberal   Dec-26-09 09:39 PM   #20 
  - The post disappearing  WeDidIt   Dec-26-09 09:40 PM   #22 
  - It took me a while to look up the legal cases  treestar   Dec-26-09 09:43 PM   #27 
  - I thought the OP said it was because the first time it contained too many paragraphs  laughingliberal   Dec-26-09 10:15 PM   #55 
  - Yeah, it says the OP included too many paragraphs.  Forkboy   Dec-26-09 11:46 PM   #77 
  - The post reappearing by popular demand says even more!  sabrina 1   Dec-27-09 12:07 AM   #83 
     - The original posting of this OP ...  NanceGreggs   Dec-27-09 01:48 AM   #101 
        - A response to the inanity of post #22 is my guess.  Forkboy   Dec-27-09 02:38 AM   #103 
           - Not talkin' to Poster # 22 ...  NanceGreggs   Dec-27-09 02:53 AM   #105 
              - The poster was replying to post #22.  Forkboy   Dec-27-09 03:04 AM   #106 
  - .  HughMoran   Dec-26-09 09:50 PM   #37 
  - +1  tblue   Dec-26-09 09:58 PM   #44 
  - To some people, shame is an unknown, indeed, unknowable emotion,  Joe Chi Minh   Dec-27-09 09:59 AM   #135 
  - +1, madfloridian nt  Enthusiast   Dec-27-09 10:01 AM   #136 
  - Yes, it has nothing to do with the content and the importance of the article  debbierlus   Dec-26-09 09:34 PM   #10 
  - Man - reading my mind  HughMoran   Dec-26-09 09:36 PM   #12 
  - first time i read about this..but i guess i do`t count  madrchsod   Dec-26-09 09:39 PM   #19 
  - you're aware this sniping just makes you look bad .... worse ............  omega minimo   Dec-26-09 09:47 PM   # 
  - Look at it this way. Had the first response in this OP not been a snipe  WeDidIt   Dec-26-09 09:50 PM   #38 
     - Wrong. Good Bye  omega minimo   Dec-26-09 09:55 PM   #41 
        - SMOOCH  WeDidIt   Dec-26-09 10:07 PM   #51 
        - Good Bye ?  Johnny ramone   Dec-27-09 11:09 AM   #153 
  - post it 100 times  G_j   Dec-26-09 10:04 PM   #49 
  - Everything loses its sting with repetition  WeDidIt   Dec-26-09 10:10 PM   #52 
     - Repetition is how people learn.  EFerrari   Dec-26-09 11:10 PM   #67 
  - There was no reason to delete the previous version of this  Ken Burch   Dec-26-09 10:39 PM   #60 
  - I think it got deleted because it was over the 4 paragraph limit  The Green Manalishi   Dec-27-09 02:05 PM   #160 
  - Do tell?  gleaner   Dec-26-09 11:06 PM   #65 
  - And that is a response to the charges made in the post how? (nt)  The Straight Story   Dec-26-09 11:13 PM   #69 
  - Your credibility continues to decline. She did not post it again  sabrina 1   Dec-27-09 12:04 AM   #82 
  - go to hell you disgusting cretinous asshole  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:07 AM   #84 
  - No one, certainly not the media, is paying enough attention to the loss of our democracy  panzerfaust   Dec-27-09 05:54 AM   #110 
  - Gee, I THOUGHT You Saw "The Light" Guess Not!! Back To Your  ChiciB1   Dec-27-09 10:08 AM   #142 
  - Shame on you.  Political Heretic   Dec-27-09 02:09 PM   #161 
  - Shame on you..this is important to ALL Americans...  winyanstaz   Dec-27-09 06:59 PM   #171 
  - Excellent article. Thank you, debbierlus.  Octafish   Dec-26-09 09:29 PM   #2 
  - Sweet.....I was thinking conspiracy theories Digby's got this up as  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 09:29 PM   #3 
  - K&R. I'm glad to see this reposted. It's important information. Thank you!  highplainsdem   Dec-26-09 09:30 PM   #4 
  - I'd suggest reading the case  treestar   Dec-26-09 09:30 PM   #5 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-26-09 09:32 PM   #6 
  - You must be getting paid for Norquist too....ChaChing nt  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 09:34 PM   #8 
  - Me? You're confusing me with your hero, Jane Hamsher. I am not her.  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:37 PM   #14 
     - There ya go....ChaChing nt  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 09:39 PM   #18 
     - I'm a kind heart so I'm going to give you a chance to say something.... ummm...  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:41 PM   #23 
        - May I just say that I am impressed you managed to type a post without  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 09:43 PM   #28 
           - I love those puppies. Now, why are you defending a f******* like Hamsher? nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:44 PM   #29 
           - Crap - you blew it!! Try to go 5 minutes without mentioning her. ChaChing nt  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 09:45 PM   #33 
              - OH! Well, I'm blocking you. bye.  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:47 PM   #35 
              - do they get puppies by the word, and more puppies for certain words?  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:16 AM   #85 
           - I accept the puppies!!!!!  dixiegrrrrl   Dec-26-09 10:53 PM   #63 
              - I have posted those puppies all over. I just love them. I think "ignored"  Thickasabrick   Dec-26-09 11:58 PM   #79 
              - You ain't missin' a thing  peace frog   Dec-27-09 08:37 AM   #126 
     - Jealous much?  Jakes Progress   Dec-26-09 09:40 PM   #21 
     - I already know the difference between left and right wing  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:42 PM   #25 
        - So why celebrate right wing decisions?  Jakes Progress   Dec-26-09 09:53 PM   #39 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-26-09 09:56 PM   #42 
           - i'm starting to alert on you. you're out of control and losing it.  inna   Dec-26-09 10:02 PM   #47 
              - This conversation with you is over. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 10:03 PM   #48 
                 - Ducking out of this thread is the smartest thing you've done yet.  Jakes Progress   Dec-27-09 12:04 AM   #81 
        - Interesting  Oilwellian   Dec-27-09 02:31 AM   #102 
     - :facepalm:  inna   Dec-26-09 09:41 PM   #24 
     - Cute people have no need to brag.  emilyg   Dec-26-09 11:19 PM   #70 
     - My love for brunettes just took a severe hit.  Forkboy   Dec-26-09 11:23 PM   #72 
     - unbelievable  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:21 AM   #87 
  - I know it's confusing, but  Jakes Progress   Dec-26-09 09:38 PM   #16 
  - I think you'd better ask the Hamsherites in here if they agree with you  Sarah Ibarruri   Dec-26-09 09:53 PM   #40 
     - What has what you just wrote  Jakes Progress   Dec-27-09 12:02 AM   #80 
        - I think they're down to recruiting cute little brunettes  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:23 AM   #88 
  - Here's what Norquist said about Bush' violations of the FISA laws:  laughingliberal   Dec-26-09 09:38 PM   #17 
  - honestly, can you NOT come up with something a bit more original than your constant reference  niyad   Dec-26-09 09:59 PM   #45 
  - So, you agree with the position of the administration on this?  laughingliberal   Dec-26-09 10:22 PM   #56 
  - Pay no attention to that torture behind the curtain!!  jgraz   Dec-27-09 01:06 AM   #99 
     - LOL!!!!!  dixiegrrrrl   Dec-27-09 09:05 AM   #129 
  - Best line:  ProSense   Dec-26-09 09:33 PM   #7 
  - Total spin  treestar   Dec-26-09 09:42 PM   #26 
     - exactly  Vattel   Dec-26-09 11:08 PM   #66 
     - Okay, so to this lay person even after your explanations, it still sounds like the OP  riderinthestorm   Dec-26-09 11:32 PM   #74 
     - well, consider this for example:  Vattel   Dec-26-09 11:49 PM   #78 
        - Here is the lower court's decision referenced to in the OP article  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 12:17 AM   #86 
           - The SCOTUS not taking a case doesn't validate what the lower court said  onenote   Dec-27-09 07:38 AM   #114 
           - I did read it but thanks for your time to post a link to the brief from the CCR site  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 07:48 AM   #120 
           - a foreseeable consequence is something that might well happen;  Vattel   Dec-27-09 07:51 AM   #122 
           - This isn't a contest. The ruling does say it and now you know it does.  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 07:56 AM   #123 
              - two points:  Vattel   Dec-27-09 08:32 AM   #125 
              - No. Sorry. I posted the correct case. In fact, the link you posted goes to the same ruling I posted.  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 08:43 AM   #127 
                 - Thanks Solly Mack and everyone else on this subthread who responded to my question  riderinthestorm   Dec-27-09 08:54 AM   #128 
                 - You're welcome, riderinthestorm  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 09:08 AM   #131 
                 - sorry  Vattel   Dec-27-09 09:06 AM   #130 
                    - OK. I see what you're saying now. But remand didn't change much of anything  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 09:30 AM   #133 
                       - The first decison  Vattel   Dec-27-09 10:38 AM   #150 
                          - the January 11, 2008 the case I posted does indeed claim that  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 11:11 AM   #154 
                             - Apparently you don't understand  Vattel   Dec-28-09 03:50 AM   #175 
                                - LMAO. Yes, of course. It's my lack of understanding  Solly Mack   Dec-28-09 04:53 AM   #176 
                                   - Oh for pity's sake.  Vattel   Dec-28-09 06:43 AM   #177 
                                      - I don't share your concern for how the US government might look based on the OP.  Solly Mack   Dec-28-09 08:00 AM   #178 
              - but deliberately taking it out of context to try to make the court look  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:08 AM   #140 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-27-09 10:14 AM   #145 
                    - Projection of the first degree  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:32 AM   #147 
                       - LMAO. There you go...making false claims again  Solly Mack   Dec-27-09 10:34 AM   #148 
           - So, that's a little inconvenient for the apologists  laughingliberal   Dec-28-09 08:35 AM   #180 
     - yes, we already know you're cool with torture  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:27 AM   #89 
        - Be fair now. She's cool with *Obama* torture.  jgraz   Dec-27-09 12:58 AM   #98 
        - Yes We Can torture with impunity and lie about it without a smirk! THAT's Change!  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 05:56 AM   #111 
        - That statement is so unfair to the administration and so ignorant  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:09 AM   #143 
        - that's just unfair, you show you are completely ignorant  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:05 AM   #138 
           - "read the case," knowing that, what? 97% of DUers don't "do" legalese  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 10:25 AM   #146 
           - You are blindly following a JOURNALIST?  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:35 AM   #149 
           - Ah, the latest apologist tactic  jgraz   Dec-27-09 12:28 PM   #157 
        - Since the Obama brief specifically states torture is illegal and repudiates its use  onenote   Dec-27-09 07:42 AM   #115 
        - Your statement is just wrong  treestar   Dec-27-09 10:04 AM   #137 
  - HAH  varelse   Dec-26-09 09:36 PM   #13 
  - Recommend  xchrom   Dec-26-09 09:45 PM   #30 
  - Reading this gives me a sick feeling in my gut...  Agony   Dec-26-09 09:45 PM   #31 
  - Thanks for reposting, and another KR!  inna   Dec-26-09 09:45 PM   #32 
  - This scary as shit and worthy of Bush.  shadesofgray   Dec-26-09 09:46 PM   #34 
  - Remind me, how is this change?  laughingliberal   Dec-26-09 09:48 PM   #36 
  - Chains you can believe in? Same you can beleve in? Yes We Can*  tblue   Dec-26-09 10:01 PM   #46 
  - k and r and thank you for posting this--since I missed it the first time.  niyad   Dec-26-09 09:57 PM   #43 
  - kick  niyad   Dec-26-09 10:05 PM   #50 
  - K&R Keep posting it. nt  Tim01   Dec-26-09 10:11 PM   #53 
  - K&R.  Vidar   Dec-26-09 10:15 PM   #54 
  - I'm sick over this.  joeunderdog   Dec-26-09 10:32 PM   #57 
  - . . .  niyad   Dec-26-09 10:32 PM   #58 
  - Important Post  Goldstein1984   Dec-26-09 10:37 PM   #59 
  - Do you have anything besides this persons website to back up your posting?  MiniMe   Dec-26-09 10:51 PM   #61 
  - here is an article from Alternet  dana_b   Dec-27-09 12:32 AM   #90 
  - Does the writer have any understanding of the law at all?  Vattel   Dec-26-09 10:51 PM   #62 
  - I read about this before the holiday ...  gleaner   Dec-26-09 11:04 PM   #64 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-26-09 11:13 PM   #68 
  - k/r - thank you.  emilyg   Dec-26-09 11:23 PM   #71 
  - Glad to see this back up. K&R again.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Dec-26-09 11:26 PM   #73 
  - This sort of stupidity is beneath contempt.  Vattel   Dec-26-09 11:32 PM   #75 
  - "The author of this piece is clearly an idiot."  ProSense   Dec-27-09 02:49 AM   #104 
     - it makes a difference because it distorts what the government brief actually said  onenote   Dec-27-09 07:44 AM   #116 
        - I think Pro's question was rhetorical. As in the fact tha "the author is an idiot" would not matter  Number23   Dec-27-09 04:35 PM   #167 
  - Another K&R. n/t  Greyhound   Dec-26-09 11:35 PM   #76 
  - K&R again! n/t  dana_b   Dec-27-09 12:33 AM   #91 
  - the fierce advocate of war crimes who lied about restoring habeas corpus  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:47 AM   #92 
  - the CONstitutional scholar who regards the Constitution as toilet paper  ima_sinnic   Dec-27-09 12:49 AM   #93 
  - Here is where you can find out all the details  scentopine   Dec-27-09 12:51 AM   #94 
  - This should be reposted every day.  jgraz   Dec-27-09 12:54 AM   #95 
  - so tell me, if its posted every day, will you actually bother to read the government's brief?  onenote   Dec-27-09 07:45 AM   #118 
     - Wow, is this the tactic you all decided on at the last meeting?  jgraz   Dec-27-09 01:20 PM   #158 
        - hey genius I posted a link to it yesterday in the deleted thread as well as today  onenote   Dec-27-09 04:57 PM   #168 
           - You'll be shocked to know I don't hang on your every post.  jgraz   Dec-27-09 11:05 PM   #174 
  - Glad you reposted this important op...  ooglymoogly   Dec-27-09 12:55 AM   #96 
  - K&R  leftstreet   Dec-27-09 12:56 AM   #97 
  - Thanks. Gives me a chance to Rec it again. K&R again!  Dr.Phool   Dec-27-09 01:07 AM   #100 
  - K & R  democrank   Dec-27-09 05:28 AM   #107 
  - Another post that disappeared . . . ???? What's going on at DU?  defendandprotect   Dec-27-09 05:49 AM   #108 
  - I think what is going on is compliance with copyright laws  onenote   Dec-27-09 07:45 AM   #117 
  - The Disappeared appear in America.  panzerfaust   Dec-27-09 05:50 AM   #109 
  - K&R! Thank you for reposting.  juno jones   Dec-27-09 07:26 AM   #112 
  - LOL! Great OP and This Post Was a Nice Side Dish  theFrankFactor   Dec-27-09 07:46 AM   #119 
     - Thanks!  juno jones   Dec-27-09 07:50 AM   #121 
  - K & R  Le Taz Hot   Dec-27-09 07:29 AM   #113 
  - K & R. We need this kind of information as informed citizens.  freddie mertz   Dec-27-09 07:57 AM   #124 
  - Shocking beyond words  rollingrock   Dec-27-09 09:21 AM   #132 
  - K&R again  RetroLounge   Dec-27-09 09:37 AM   #134 
  - It's ever clearer why ObamaCo is protecting BushCo's criminal torturing ass.  katandmoon   Dec-27-09 10:06 AM   #139 
  - I want to thank you for posting this  Slit Skirt   Dec-27-09 10:08 AM   #141 
  - THANKS For the Re-Post! I "Wondered" WHY It Was Removed & Asked  ChiciB1   Dec-27-09 10:10 AM   #144 
  - K&R  Yuugal   Dec-27-09 10:52 AM   #151 
  - Just one more pony that the left wants, their full civil rights  MadHound   Dec-27-09 10:58 AM   #152 
  - K&R...Should be pinned to the top.  bvar22   Dec-27-09 11:43 AM   #155 
  - K&R. nt  OnyxCollie   Dec-27-09 11:44 AM   #156 
  - Thanks for bringing attention to this issue  Alameda   Dec-27-09 01:33 PM   #159 
  - Jeebus. I weep for my country --  kath   Dec-27-09 03:07 PM   #162 
  - I am not sure I know how to respond  AuntPatsy   Dec-27-09 03:26 PM   #163 
  - K & R! nt  earth mom   Dec-27-09 03:48 PM   #164 
  - Posted on the original post. I'm shocked to see the venom posted here  AllyCat   Dec-27-09 04:04 PM   #165 
  - K&R  Odin2005   Dec-27-09 04:23 PM   #166 
  - K&R  pleah   Dec-27-09 05:07 PM   #169 
  - K & R...thank you for re posting this....this is so important..  winyanstaz   Dec-27-09 06:58 PM   #170 
  - There's nothing like  LWolf   Dec-27-09 07:02 PM   #172 
  - Anywhere the political class is unafrid  edc   Dec-27-09 08:54 PM   #173 
  - knr  kgnu_fan   Dec-28-09 08:12 AM   #179 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC