Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 14. Me? You're confusing me with your hero, Jane Hamsher. I am not her. |
|
I'm not an aged and dyed bleached blonde who worships at the lap of Grover NOrquist. I'm a cute brunette who can smell bullshit a mile away.
|
| -Repost: In Silence, Obama & the Supreme Court imperil Human Liberty with a Sentence |
debbierlus |
Dec-26-09 09:24 PM |
#0 |
-
Not enough attention paid the first time you posted this? |
WeDidIt |
Dec-26-09 09:27 PM |
#1 |
 -
You should be ashamed for that statement. |
madfloridian |
Dec-26-09 09:34 PM |
#9 |
  -
Thanks friend:) |
debbierlus |
Dec-26-09 09:34 PM |
#11 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Dec-26-09 09:37 PM |
#15 |
  -
+1 nt |
laughingliberal |
Dec-26-09 09:39 PM |
#20 |
  -
The post disappearing |
WeDidIt |
Dec-26-09 09:40 PM |
#22 |
   -
It took me a while to look up the legal cases |
treestar |
Dec-26-09 09:43 PM |
#27 |
   -
I thought the OP said it was because the first time it contained too many paragraphs |
laughingliberal |
Dec-26-09 10:15 PM |
#55 |
   -
Yeah, it says the OP included too many paragraphs. |
Forkboy |
Dec-26-09 11:46 PM |
#77 |
   -
The post reappearing by popular demand says even more! |
sabrina 1 |
Dec-27-09 12:07 AM |
#83 |
  -
The original posting of this OP ... |
NanceGreggs |
Dec-27-09 01:48 AM |
#101 |
  -
A response to the inanity of post #22 is my guess. |
Forkboy |
Dec-27-09 02:38 AM |
#103 |
  -
Not talkin' to Poster # 22 ... |
NanceGreggs |
Dec-27-09 02:53 AM |
#105 |
  -
The poster was replying to post #22. |
Forkboy |
Dec-27-09 03:04 AM |
#106 |
  -
. |
HughMoran |
Dec-26-09 09:50 PM |
#37 |
  -
+1 |
tblue |
Dec-26-09 09:58 PM |
#44 |
  -
To some people, shame is an unknown, indeed, unknowable emotion, |
Joe Chi Minh |
Dec-27-09 09:59 AM |
#135 |
  -
+1, madfloridian nt |
Enthusiast |
Dec-27-09 10:01 AM |
#136 |
 -
Yes, it has nothing to do with the content and the importance of the article |
debbierlus |
Dec-26-09 09:34 PM |
#10 |
 -
Man - reading my mind |
HughMoran |
Dec-26-09 09:36 PM |
#12 |
 -
first time i read about this..but i guess i do`t count |
madrchsod |
Dec-26-09 09:39 PM |
#19 |
 -
you're aware this sniping just makes you look bad .... worse ............ |
omega minimo |
Dec-26-09 09:47 PM |
# |
  -
Look at it this way. Had the first response in this OP not been a snipe |
WeDidIt |
Dec-26-09 09:50 PM |
#38 |
 -
Wrong. Good Bye |
omega minimo |
Dec-26-09 09:55 PM |
#41 |
 -
SMOOCH |
WeDidIt |
Dec-26-09 10:07 PM |
#51 |
 -
Good Bye ? |
Johnny ramone |
Dec-27-09 11:09 AM |
#153 |
 -
post it 100 times |
G_j |
Dec-26-09 10:04 PM |
#49 |
  -
Everything loses its sting with repetition |
WeDidIt |
Dec-26-09 10:10 PM |
#52 |
 -
Repetition is how people learn. |
EFerrari |
Dec-26-09 11:10 PM |
#67 |
 -
There was no reason to delete the previous version of this |
Ken Burch |
Dec-26-09 10:39 PM |
#60 |
  -
I think it got deleted because it was over the 4 paragraph limit |
The Green Manalishi |
Dec-27-09 02:05 PM |
#160 |
 -
Do tell? |
gleaner |
Dec-26-09 11:06 PM |
#65 |
 -
And that is a response to the charges made in the post how? (nt) |
The Straight Story |
Dec-26-09 11:13 PM |
#69 |
 -
Your credibility continues to decline. She did not post it again |
sabrina 1 |
Dec-27-09 12:04 AM |
#82 |
 -
go to hell you disgusting cretinous asshole |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:07 AM |
#84 |
 -
No one, certainly not the media, is paying enough attention to the loss of our democracy |
panzerfaust |
Dec-27-09 05:54 AM |
#110 |
 -
Gee, I THOUGHT You Saw "The Light" Guess Not!! Back To Your |
ChiciB1 |
Dec-27-09 10:08 AM |
#142 |
 -
Shame on you. |
Political Heretic |
Dec-27-09 02:09 PM |
#161 |
 -
Shame on you..this is important to ALL Americans... |
winyanstaz |
Dec-27-09 06:59 PM |
#171 |
-
Excellent article. Thank you, debbierlus. |
Octafish |
Dec-26-09 09:29 PM |
#2 |
-
Sweet.....I was thinking conspiracy theories Digby's got this up as |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 09:29 PM |
#3 |
-
K&R. I'm glad to see this reposted. It's important information. Thank you! |
highplainsdem |
Dec-26-09 09:30 PM |
#4 |
-
I'd suggest reading the case |
treestar |
Dec-26-09 09:30 PM |
#5 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-26-09 09:32 PM |
#6 |
 -
You must be getting paid for Norquist too....ChaChing nt |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 09:34 PM |
#8 |
  -
Me? You're confusing me with your hero, Jane Hamsher. I am not her. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:37 PM |
#14 |
 -
There ya go....ChaChing nt |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 09:39 PM |
#18 |
  -
I'm a kind heart so I'm going to give you a chance to say something.... ummm... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:41 PM |
#23 |
 -
May I just say that I am impressed you managed to type a post without |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 09:43 PM |
#28 |
 -
I love those puppies. Now, why are you defending a f******* like Hamsher? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:44 PM |
#29 |
  -
Crap - you blew it!! Try to go 5 minutes without mentioning her. ChaChing nt |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 09:45 PM |
#33 |
 -
OH! Well, I'm blocking you. bye. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:47 PM |
#35 |
 -
do they get puppies by the word, and more puppies for certain words? |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:16 AM |
#85 |
 -
I accept the puppies!!!!! |
dixiegrrrrl |
Dec-26-09 10:53 PM |
#63 |
 -
I have posted those puppies all over. I just love them. I think "ignored" |
Thickasabrick |
Dec-26-09 11:58 PM |
#79 |
 -
You ain't missin' a thing |
peace frog |
Dec-27-09 08:37 AM |
#126 |
 -
Jealous much? |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-26-09 09:40 PM |
#21 |
  -
I already know the difference between left and right wing |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:42 PM |
#25 |
 -
So why celebrate right wing decisions? |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-26-09 09:53 PM |
#39 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-26-09 09:56 PM |
#42 |
 -
i'm starting to alert on you. you're out of control and losing it. |
inna |
Dec-26-09 10:02 PM |
#47 |
 -
This conversation with you is over. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 10:03 PM |
#48 |
 -
Ducking out of this thread is the smartest thing you've done yet. |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-27-09 12:04 AM |
#81 |
 -
Interesting |
Oilwellian |
Dec-27-09 02:31 AM |
#102 |
 -
:facepalm: |
inna |
Dec-26-09 09:41 PM |
#24 |
 -
Cute people have no need to brag. |
emilyg |
Dec-26-09 11:19 PM |
#70 |
 -
My love for brunettes just took a severe hit. |
Forkboy |
Dec-26-09 11:23 PM |
#72 |
 -
unbelievable |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:21 AM |
#87 |
 -
I know it's confusing, but |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-26-09 09:38 PM |
#16 |
  -
I think you'd better ask the Hamsherites in here if they agree with you |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-26-09 09:53 PM |
#40 |
 -
What has what you just wrote |
Jakes Progress |
Dec-27-09 12:02 AM |
#80 |
 -
I think they're down to recruiting cute little brunettes |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:23 AM |
#88 |
 -
Here's what Norquist said about Bush' violations of the FISA laws: |
laughingliberal |
Dec-26-09 09:38 PM |
#17 |
 -
honestly, can you NOT come up with something a bit more original than your constant reference |
niyad |
Dec-26-09 09:59 PM |
#45 |
 -
So, you agree with the position of the administration on this? |
laughingliberal |
Dec-26-09 10:22 PM |
#56 |
 -
Pay no attention to that torture behind the curtain!! |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 01:06 AM |
#99 |
-
LOL!!!!! |
dixiegrrrrl |
Dec-27-09 09:05 AM |
#129 |
-
Best line: |
ProSense |
Dec-26-09 09:33 PM |
#7 |
 -
Total spin |
treestar |
Dec-26-09 09:42 PM |
#26 |
-
exactly |
Vattel |
Dec-26-09 11:08 PM |
#66 |
-
Okay, so to this lay person even after your explanations, it still sounds like the OP |
riderinthestorm |
Dec-26-09 11:32 PM |
#74 |
 -
well, consider this for example: |
Vattel |
Dec-26-09 11:49 PM |
#78 |
-
Here is the lower court's decision referenced to in the OP article |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 12:17 AM |
#86 |
-
The SCOTUS not taking a case doesn't validate what the lower court said |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 07:38 AM |
#114 |
 -
I did read it but thanks for your time to post a link to the brief from the CCR site |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 07:48 AM |
#120 |
-
a foreseeable consequence is something that might well happen; |
Vattel |
Dec-27-09 07:51 AM |
#122 |
 -
This isn't a contest. The ruling does say it and now you know it does. |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 07:56 AM |
#123 |
-
two points: |
Vattel |
Dec-27-09 08:32 AM |
#125 |
 -
No. Sorry. I posted the correct case. In fact, the link you posted goes to the same ruling I posted. |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 08:43 AM |
#127 |
-
Thanks Solly Mack and everyone else on this subthread who responded to my question |
riderinthestorm |
Dec-27-09 08:54 AM |
#128 |
 -
You're welcome, riderinthestorm |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 09:08 AM |
#131 |
-
sorry |
Vattel |
Dec-27-09 09:06 AM |
#130 |
-
OK. I see what you're saying now. But remand didn't change much of anything |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 09:30 AM |
#133 |
-
The first decison |
Vattel |
Dec-27-09 10:38 AM |
#150 |
-
the January 11, 2008 the case I posted does indeed claim that |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 11:11 AM |
#154 |
-
Apparently you don't understand |
Vattel |
Dec-28-09 03:50 AM |
#175 |
-
LMAO. Yes, of course. It's my lack of understanding |
Solly Mack |
Dec-28-09 04:53 AM |
#176 |
-
Oh for pity's sake. |
Vattel |
Dec-28-09 06:43 AM |
#177 |
-
I don't share your concern for how the US government might look based on the OP. |
Solly Mack |
Dec-28-09 08:00 AM |
#178 |
-
but deliberately taking it out of context to try to make the court look |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:08 AM |
#140 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-27-09 10:14 AM |
#145 |
-
Projection of the first degree |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:32 AM |
#147 |
-
LMAO. There you go...making false claims again |
Solly Mack |
Dec-27-09 10:34 AM |
#148 |
-
So, that's a little inconvenient for the apologists |
laughingliberal |
Dec-28-09 08:35 AM |
#180 |
-
yes, we already know you're cool with torture |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:27 AM |
#89 |
-
Be fair now. She's cool with *Obama* torture. |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 12:58 AM |
#98 |
 -
Yes We Can torture with impunity and lie about it without a smirk! THAT's Change! |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 05:56 AM |
#111 |
  -
That statement is so unfair to the administration and so ignorant |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:09 AM |
#143 |
 -
that's just unfair, you show you are completely ignorant |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:05 AM |
#138 |
-
"read the case," knowing that, what? 97% of DUers don't "do" legalese |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 10:25 AM |
#146 |
 -
You are blindly following a JOURNALIST? |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:35 AM |
#149 |
-
Ah, the latest apologist tactic |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 12:28 PM |
#157 |
-
Since the Obama brief specifically states torture is illegal and repudiates its use |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 07:42 AM |
#115 |
-
Your statement is just wrong |
treestar |
Dec-27-09 10:04 AM |
#137 |
-
HAH |
varelse |
Dec-26-09 09:36 PM |
#13 |
-
Recommend |
xchrom |
Dec-26-09 09:45 PM |
#30 |
-
Reading this gives me a sick feeling in my gut... |
Agony |
Dec-26-09 09:45 PM |
#31 |
-
Thanks for reposting, and another KR! |
inna |
Dec-26-09 09:45 PM |
#32 |
-
This scary as shit and worthy of Bush. |
shadesofgray |
Dec-26-09 09:46 PM |
#34 |
-
Remind me, how is this change? |
laughingliberal |
Dec-26-09 09:48 PM |
#36 |
 -
Chains you can believe in? Same you can beleve in? Yes We Can* |
tblue |
Dec-26-09 10:01 PM |
#46 |
-
k and r and thank you for posting this--since I missed it the first time. |
niyad |
Dec-26-09 09:57 PM |
#43 |
-
kick |
niyad |
Dec-26-09 10:05 PM |
#50 |
-
K&R Keep posting it. nt |
Tim01 |
Dec-26-09 10:11 PM |
#53 |
-
K&R. |
Vidar |
Dec-26-09 10:15 PM |
#54 |
-
I'm sick over this. |
joeunderdog |
Dec-26-09 10:32 PM |
#57 |
-
. . . |
niyad |
Dec-26-09 10:32 PM |
#58 |
-
Important Post |
Goldstein1984 |
Dec-26-09 10:37 PM |
#59 |
-
Do you have anything besides this persons website to back up your posting? |
MiniMe |
Dec-26-09 10:51 PM |
#61 |
 -
here is an article from Alternet |
dana_b |
Dec-27-09 12:32 AM |
#90 |
-
Does the writer have any understanding of the law at all? |
Vattel |
Dec-26-09 10:51 PM |
#62 |
-
I read about this before the holiday ... |
gleaner |
Dec-26-09 11:04 PM |
#64 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-26-09 11:13 PM |
#68 |
-
k/r - thank you. |
emilyg |
Dec-26-09 11:23 PM |
#71 |
-
Glad to see this back up. K&R again. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Dec-26-09 11:26 PM |
#73 |
-
This sort of stupidity is beneath contempt. |
Vattel |
Dec-26-09 11:32 PM |
#75 |
 -
"The author of this piece is clearly an idiot." |
ProSense |
Dec-27-09 02:49 AM |
#104 |
-
it makes a difference because it distorts what the government brief actually said |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 07:44 AM |
#116 |
-
I think Pro's question was rhetorical. As in the fact tha "the author is an idiot" would not matter |
Number23 |
Dec-27-09 04:35 PM |
#167 |
-
Another K&R. n/t |
Greyhound |
Dec-26-09 11:35 PM |
#76 |
-
K&R again! n/t |
dana_b |
Dec-27-09 12:33 AM |
#91 |
-
the fierce advocate of war crimes who lied about restoring habeas corpus |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:47 AM |
#92 |
 -
the CONstitutional scholar who regards the Constitution as toilet paper |
ima_sinnic |
Dec-27-09 12:49 AM |
#93 |
-
Here is where you can find out all the details |
scentopine |
Dec-27-09 12:51 AM |
#94 |
-
This should be reposted every day. |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 12:54 AM |
#95 |
 -
so tell me, if its posted every day, will you actually bother to read the government's brief? |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 07:45 AM |
#118 |
-
Wow, is this the tactic you all decided on at the last meeting? |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 01:20 PM |
#158 |
-
hey genius I posted a link to it yesterday in the deleted thread as well as today |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 04:57 PM |
#168 |
-
You'll be shocked to know I don't hang on your every post. |
jgraz |
Dec-27-09 11:05 PM |
#174 |
-
Glad you reposted this important op... |
ooglymoogly |
Dec-27-09 12:55 AM |
#96 |
-
K&R |
leftstreet |
Dec-27-09 12:56 AM |
#97 |
-
Thanks. Gives me a chance to Rec it again. K&R again! |
Dr.Phool |
Dec-27-09 01:07 AM |
#100 |
-
K & R |
democrank |
Dec-27-09 05:28 AM |
#107 |
-
Another post that disappeared . . . ???? What's going on at DU? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-27-09 05:49 AM |
#108 |
 -
I think what is going on is compliance with copyright laws |
onenote |
Dec-27-09 07:45 AM |
#117 |
-
The Disappeared appear in America. |
panzerfaust |
Dec-27-09 05:50 AM |
#109 |
-
K&R! Thank you for reposting. |
juno jones |
Dec-27-09 07:26 AM |
#112 |
 -
LOL! Great OP and This Post Was a Nice Side Dish |
theFrankFactor |
Dec-27-09 07:46 AM |
#119 |
-
Thanks! |
juno jones |
Dec-27-09 07:50 AM |
#121 |
-
K & R |
Le Taz Hot |
Dec-27-09 07:29 AM |
#113 |
-
K & R. We need this kind of information as informed citizens. |
freddie mertz |
Dec-27-09 07:57 AM |
#124 |
-
Shocking beyond words |
rollingrock |
Dec-27-09 09:21 AM |
#132 |
-
K&R again |
RetroLounge |
Dec-27-09 09:37 AM |
#134 |
-
It's ever clearer why ObamaCo is protecting BushCo's criminal torturing ass. |
katandmoon |
Dec-27-09 10:06 AM |
#139 |
-
I want to thank you for posting this |
Slit Skirt |
Dec-27-09 10:08 AM |
#141 |
-
THANKS For the Re-Post! I "Wondered" WHY It Was Removed & Asked |
ChiciB1 |
Dec-27-09 10:10 AM |
#144 |
-
K&R |
Yuugal |
Dec-27-09 10:52 AM |
#151 |
-
Just one more pony that the left wants, their full civil rights |
MadHound |
Dec-27-09 10:58 AM |
#152 |
-
K&R...Should be pinned to the top. |
bvar22 |
Dec-27-09 11:43 AM |
#155 |
-
K&R. nt |
OnyxCollie |
Dec-27-09 11:44 AM |
#156 |
-
Thanks for bringing attention to this issue |
Alameda |
Dec-27-09 01:33 PM |
#159 |
-
Jeebus. I weep for my country -- |
kath |
Dec-27-09 03:07 PM |
#162 |
-
I am not sure I know how to respond |
AuntPatsy |
Dec-27-09 03:26 PM |
#163 |
-
K & R! nt |
earth mom |
Dec-27-09 03:48 PM |
#164 |
-
Posted on the original post. I'm shocked to see the venom posted here |
AllyCat |
Dec-27-09 04:04 PM |
#165 |
-
K&R |
Odin2005 |
Dec-27-09 04:23 PM |
#166 |
-
K&R |
pleah |
Dec-27-09 05:07 PM |
#169 |
-
K & R...thank you for re posting this....this is so important.. |
winyanstaz |
Dec-27-09 06:58 PM |
#170 |
-
There's nothing like |
LWolf |
Dec-27-09 07:02 PM |
#172 |
-
Anywhere the political class is unafrid |
edc |
Dec-27-09 08:54 PM |
#173 |
-
knr |
kgnu_fan |
Dec-28-09 08:12 AM |
#179 |