You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #37: Obama's conflict avoidance/decision making problem means Rahm will stay until Rahm decides to go. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. Obama's conflict avoidance/decision making problem means Rahm will stay until Rahm decides to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Let's play pretend: Rahm Emanuel is gone. cali  Dec-25-09 11:46 AM   #0 
  - What sucks is  Jamastiene   Dec-25-09 11:47 AM   #1 
  - Obama's conflict avoidance/decision making problem means Rahm will stay until Rahm decides to go.  timeforpeace   Dec-25-09 12:24 PM   #37 
  - Rahm is up to his neck in causing the problems  notesdev   Dec-25-09 11:49 AM   #2 
  - That he was on the board of Freddy Mac is not de facto guilt of anything  cali   Dec-25-09 11:50 AM   #6 
     - I'm of the impression  notesdev   Dec-25-09 11:59 AM   #21 
        - well, heck yeah!!  cliffordu   Dec-25-09 12:00 PM   #22 
        - Yes indeed. He's the lobbyists, and corporations go to guy.  donheld   Dec-25-09 01:04 PM   #51 
  - Exactly.  charlyvi   Dec-25-09 11:49 AM   #3 
  - Who said anything about "Progressive?" I'd be happy with someone who has a clue.  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 11:50 AM   #4 
  - A clue about what? Evidently he's quite well versed in the intricacies  cali   Dec-25-09 11:52 AM   #8 
     - Yeah, his electoral record with the DCCC is proof of his brilliance.  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 11:53 AM   #11 
     - Which has zip all to do with what I wrote.  cali   Dec-25-09 11:55 AM   #15 
        - But it has everything to do with what I wrote. See how that works?  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:03 PM   #23 
           - no, actually I don't. your response to my post wasn't a response to what I wrote  cali   Dec-25-09 12:08 PM   #25 
              - Your whole premise was "replace him with your dream progressive." I said it's not about...  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:11 PM   #28 
                 - no, dear. my whole point is that Rahm Emanuel is following the President's  cali   Dec-25-09 12:12 PM   #30 
                    - Oh, I see. So that part about Progressivism was just a cheap shot.  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:15 PM   #32 
                    - And my point is that the next time the President might appoint someone who carries out his orders...  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:19 PM   #36 
                    - No, your underlying premise is that the COS is a neutral vessel, and that any other COS would...  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:25 PM   #38 
                       - I am a Progressive. The shot was at people who live in a little fantasy world.  cali   Dec-25-09 12:29 PM   #40 
                          - Now who's ignoring whose main premise?  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:45 PM   #46 
                          - If you're a Progressive, then why aren't you concerned that Rahmbo deep-sixed a lot of electable...  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 01:26 PM   #57 
     - Okay, how about someone who has a soul to go along with the muscle?  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:07 PM   #24 
        - A soul? What the fuck?  cali   Dec-25-09 12:11 PM   #29 
           - Okay, since you ask, a soul is "the spiritual part of humans regarded in its moral aspect...  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:14 PM   #31 
              - And who do you think you are to judge whether Rahm Emanuel or  cali   Dec-25-09 12:17 PM   #34 
                 - How do you know I'm not?  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:25 PM   #39 
                    - that's easy: I don't believe in god. n/t  cali   Dec-25-09 12:33 PM   #42 
                       - I know.  ClassWarrior   Dec-25-09 12:44 PM   #45 
  - Blaming Rahm makes the POTUS seem like a weak knee'd sniveling coward.. nt  boston bean   Dec-25-09 11:50 AM   #5 
  - Well, as long as we're playing pretend, then I say:  rateyes   Dec-25-09 11:52 AM   #7 
  - If wishes were horse, I'd be out cantering in a snowy field.  cali   Dec-25-09 11:53 AM   #9 
     - True that. That's why wingless frogs bump their asses on the ground  rateyes   Dec-25-09 11:58 AM   #18 
     - And you would be postng a lot less!  unc70   Dec-25-09 08:15 PM   #62 
  - Well, to be brutally honest,  BP2   Dec-25-09 11:53 AM   #10 
  - I'd guess both Axelrod and Jarett are more influential regarding policy than Rahm.  cali   Dec-25-09 11:55 AM   #13 
     - Agreed. but  BP2   Dec-25-09 01:54 PM   #60 
  - Sometimes, you just want a bad guy to take the fall  eleny   Dec-25-09 11:55 AM   #12 
  - When he said "make the deal" with Lieberman and destroyed the Medicare  neverforget   Dec-25-09 11:55 AM   #14 
  - What makes you think he wasn't doing what his boss wanted him to do?  cali   Dec-25-09 11:57 AM   #16 
     - That's why I am disappointed and my enthusiasm for Obama is waning.  neverforget   Dec-25-09 01:50 PM   #58 
  - Dream Progressive? I would be happy with a Democrat.  Ruby the Liberal   Dec-25-09 11:57 AM   #17 
  - Bingo. nt  rateyes   Dec-25-09 11:58 AM   #20 
  - +1  baldguy   Dec-25-09 12:09 PM   #27 
  - Cali ~ you make too much sense  goclark   Dec-25-09 11:58 AM   #19 
  - let's FIRE Lewis Sachs, from Treasury:  amborin   Dec-25-09 12:08 PM   #26 
  - I don't get it either  TorchTheWitch   Dec-25-09 12:17 PM   #33 
  - Exactly. well said.  cali   Dec-25-09 12:18 PM   #35 
  - You're right. Obama is as bad as Rahm. They both need to go.  Vidar   Dec-25-09 12:32 PM   #41 
  - Whether they do or not, they're here now. Obama is President for the next  cali   Dec-25-09 12:59 PM   #50 
  - I thought from the thread title that I was going to  BootinUp   Dec-25-09 12:34 PM   #43 
  - K & r. I agree with you and Torchthewitch in post #33. nt  jonnyblitz   Dec-25-09 12:38 PM   #44 
  - You said  DonCoquixote   Dec-25-09 12:46 PM   #47 
  - How can Rahm be gone when we're not allowed to ask for an invesigation...  Junkdrawer   Dec-25-09 12:51 PM   #48 
  - you most certainly can ask for an investigation. You can sign Mr.  cali   Dec-25-09 12:57 PM   #49 
     - No. I get it. Rove was above the law and Rahm is above the law....  Junkdrawer   Dec-25-09 01:05 PM   #52 
        - Actually, Rove didn't hold the same job as Emanuel  cali   Dec-25-09 01:09 PM   #53 
           - I'd love to chat, but I'm late for my teabagger meeting....  Junkdrawer   Dec-25-09 01:17 PM   #54 
  - has petition to investigate Rahm for his actions at Freddie Mac  SandWalker1984   Dec-25-09 01:21 PM   #55 
  - Ahem (we're not allowed to post that)....  Junkdrawer   Dec-25-09 01:22 PM   #56 
  - I really hate that you're right  varelse   Dec-25-09 01:52 PM   #59 
  - In pointing that Obama is not a progressive  xchrom   Dec-25-09 02:16 PM   #61 
  - Rahm Emmanuel ain't going nowhere  WeDidIt   Dec-25-09 08:17 PM   #63 
  - Since your OP Headline is such a tease....I'll play anyway. Right  Thickasabrick   Dec-25-09 08:22 PM   #64 
  - Stop toying with me.  donco6   Dec-25-09 08:43 PM   #65 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC