NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. Deliberately misinterpretation certainly has right or left wing motives |
| -Article One: Section 9 of the US Constitution |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 10:48 AM |
#0 |
 -
A fine example of Holiday Inn Express lawyering |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 10:52 AM |
#1 |
 -
coming from you... |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 10:54 AM |
#3 |
 -
Yes I deal in facts and we have seen what you think of those pesky things |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 10:56 AM |
#4 |
| -
hmmm... I post quotes from the US Constitution, you respond with your typical snark |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 10:59 AM |
#5 |
| -
Sigh, you want the facts? Here you go |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:09 AM |
#11 |
| -
*sigh* ... no, this is called an editorial |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:18 AM |
#18 |
| -
No that's called a legal opinion by a lawyer, but you keep on deluding yourself |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:36 AM |
#30 |
| -
ah, so you admit it's an opinion piece... thanks, that's all I needed |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:39 AM |
#33 |
| -
You deal in agenda PR and we all know it |
havocmom |
Dec-25-09 11:04 AM |
#7 |
| -
That sounds like a good description of your destructive agenda |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:05 AM |
#9 |
| -
Ah, attack the person with the lack of tact to say what most think |
havocmom |
Dec-25-09 11:44 AM |
#36 |
| -
yet it was such an appropriate response to your post |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 12:01 PM |
#44 |
| -
LOL, more of same tactic |
havocmom |
Dec-25-09 12:27 PM |
#50 |
| -
yeah!! |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 12:30 PM |
#51 |
| -
Oh an here, just to show you what a fool you made of yourself |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:09 AM |
#13 |
| -
spot on, havocmom |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:39 AM |
#34 |
| -
That was my thought at this person's posts in this thread too |
Matariki |
Dec-25-09 03:42 PM |
#59 |
| -
You have zero credibility on this board. |
arcadian |
Dec-25-09 12:51 PM |
#52 |
| -
Look who's talkin'!!! |
NYC_SKP |
Dec-25-09 10:08 PM |
#64 |
| -
So the constitution is actually written in code? |
Xicano |
Dec-25-09 07:05 PM |
#63 |
| -
People who don't want health care... won't pay for it if they can... |
HysteryDiagnosis |
Dec-25-09 10:53 AM |
#2 |
| -
The mandate was put in at the request of the insurance companies. |
dkf |
Dec-25-09 11:02 AM |
#6 |
| -
K & R nt |
Obamanaut |
Dec-25-09 11:04 AM |
#8 |
| -
You might want to read this |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:11 AM |
#15 |
| -
The last paragraph of your own article admits the matter is not settled, to wit: |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:57 AM |
#41 |
| -
There is sentiment from the Right Wing that the |
truedelphi |
Dec-26-09 12:14 AM |
#66 |
| -
What gives Congress the authority to require individuals to buy |
JDPriestly |
Dec-25-09 01:33 PM |
#54 |
| -
they'll do it via the income tax code, and it will be constitutional |
unblock |
Dec-25-09 11:08 AM |
#10 |
| -
I agree with you, unblock. |
JDPriestly |
Dec-25-09 01:34 PM |
#55 |
| -
I'd point out all the other times you get fined for not doing something |
MineralMan |
Dec-25-09 11:09 AM |
#12 |
| -
Enjoy your Christmas I got this one MM |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:12 AM |
#17 |
| -
well, no you don't |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:22 AM |
#22 |
| -
Thanks! |
MineralMan |
Dec-25-09 06:58 PM |
#62 |
| -
Give some examples of some fines placed on you by the federal government for just living |
JDPriestly |
Dec-25-09 01:39 PM |
#56 |
| -
pins dropping.... |
Matariki |
Dec-25-09 03:46 PM |
#61 |
| -
For those that recced this idea |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:10 AM |
#14 |
| -
You've posted this editorial three times now |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:20 AM |
#19 |
| -
You need to look up the terms "legal opinion" and "editorial" as you clearly |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:38 AM |
#32 |
| -
lol... once again, your snark fails you |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:55 AM |
#40 |
| -
Ah, mystery solved. |
havocmom |
Dec-25-09 11:45 AM |
#37 |
| -
Are you afraid you are being ripped off by the RNC? |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 12:01 PM |
#43 |
| -
Which kindergarten did that one come from? |
havocmom |
Dec-25-09 10:28 PM |
#65 |
| -
If that's the case, how, how can there be a mandate to pay |
napi21 |
Dec-25-09 11:11 AM |
#16 |
| -
none of the items you mention are purchases of a product from a private, for-profit company |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:20 AM |
#20 |
| -
Income Tax had an amendment to the constitution |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 11:35 AM |
#29 |
| -
seems to me you are wrong on both counts |
hfojvt |
Dec-25-09 11:22 AM |
#21 |
| -
pay the fine, or pay the fine |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:25 AM |
#23 |
| -
because the trial option exists |
hfojvt |
Dec-25-09 03:21 PM |
#57 |
| -
if everyone is considered guilty, |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 03:43 PM |
#60 |
| -
Difference is though, we are not paying the government, we are paying private companies |
The Straight Story |
Dec-25-09 11:27 AM |
#24 |
| -
K & R...good job...well done..thank you :) |
winyanstaz |
Dec-25-09 11:29 AM |
#25 |
| -
thanks! |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:34 AM |
#28 |
| -
My sister-in-law forwarded something like this yesteday. She got it off Free Republic. 'Nuff said. |
apocalypsehow |
Dec-25-09 11:32 AM |
#26 |
| -
Yeah sad to see so many right wing memes being pushed at DU |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 11:40 AM |
#35 |
| -
I didn't know the constitution was suddenly Right Wing or Left Wing |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 11:48 AM |
#39 |
| -
Deliberately misinterpretation certainly has right or left wing motives |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 12:00 PM |
#42 |
| -
Yes and I don't think that clause is the issue |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 12:02 PM |
#45 |
| -
You might find this article of interest |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 12:08 PM |
#46 |
| -
Translation it is going to the Supreme Court |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 12:11 PM |
#47 |
| -
It may or may not make it that far. I am sure there will be politically motivated lawsuits |
NJmaverick |
Dec-25-09 12:14 PM |
#48 |
| -
It is an unprecedented expansion of Federal Power |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 12:19 PM |
#49 |
| -
Pretending the 16th amendment doesn't exist is generally something the right wing does |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-26-09 12:34 AM |
#68 |
| -
I think the 10th amendment and the 4th amendment make better arguments |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 11:33 AM |
#27 |
| -
I agree there, too... |
ixion |
Dec-25-09 11:38 AM |
#31 |
| -
My 10th amendment argument would be |
AllentownJake |
Dec-25-09 11:46 AM |
#38 |
| -
Just two of a number of good reasons why the bill can only work |
JDPriestly |
Dec-25-09 01:26 PM |
#53 |
| -
K&R |
Odin2005 |
Dec-25-09 03:26 PM |
#58 |
| -
+10 |
amborin |
Dec-27-09 01:03 AM |
#75 |
| -
Sure that makes sense, if you completely ignore the 16th amendment |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-26-09 12:33 AM |
#67 |
| -
my, how gloriously you support our Great Corporations |
ixion |
Dec-26-09 04:35 AM |
#72 |
| -
So, I support our corproations because I tore your bogus constitutional argument to shreds? |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-26-09 03:15 PM |
#74 |
| -
uh, simply dismissing them is not "tearing them to shreds" |
ixion |
Dec-27-09 05:51 AM |
#76 |
| -
I refuted your arguments |
Hippo_Tron |
Dec-27-09 11:00 PM |
#77 |
| -
must read from "after downing street" : |
amborin |
Dec-26-09 01:26 AM |
#69 |
| -
excellent post |
ixion |
Dec-26-09 04:36 AM |
#73 |
| -
The mandate is totally unconstitutional. Don't let the naysayers lie that it isn't. nt |
earth mom |
Dec-26-09 02:26 AM |
#70 |
| -
It's forcing us to enter into private contracts, but coercion voids contracts. |
Waiting For Everyman |
Dec-26-09 02:47 AM |
#71 |
| -
K&R n/t |
amborin |
Dec-27-09 11:29 PM |
#78 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread