Reply #32: I see you are using the MSM here and the PR firm

[sabrina 1]

her family hired. That is clear by your use of their talking points, now very recognizable, to try to distract from the mountain of evidence that actually does exist. Mignini, eg, is only one of many people there, several judges and lawyers who review the evidence. Even with him out of the picture, excluding anything he contributed to the case, she was a prime suspect having nothing to do with him, but with her own actions.

She lied and lied, over and over again, about almost everything and each time she was caught, moved on to another lie. If she is innocent, her phone records, the lies she and her boyfriend told about where they were that night, her initial confession, then retraction, the phone calls she made (or said she made) none of this required Mignini's involvement at all.


Rely on the MSM if you want, but if you want facts, then do some research. I did and it changed my mind completely as some things just cannot be explained away. It's interesting how the MSM focus only on Mignini and disregard everything else. Why do you think they are doing that? One thing is certain, once the facts are reported here as they have been in every other country, Mignini becomes a very minor issue and she looks very guilty as does her boyfriend.