kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-05-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
at least, you recognize it, even without the label.
|
| -Why are some Democrats so unhappy with their Party ? |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 09:56 PM |
#0 |
 -
it's not the "party", just some politicians elected under the party's name nt |
msongs |
Dec-05-09 09:58 PM |
#1 |
| -
- |
G_j |
Dec-05-09 09:59 PM |
#2 |
| -
Immaturity, lack of foresight, and laziness nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-05-09 09:59 PM |
#3 |
  -
On the part some of our party leaders? |
tekisui |
Dec-05-09 10:28 PM |
#26 |
| -
Hey, looks like you're asking questions, and then answering them yourself |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Dec-06-09 12:00 AM |
#42 |
| -
Because they do not understand the difference between campaigning and governing. |
Ozymanithrax |
Dec-05-09 10:00 PM |
#4 |
| -
There should be no difference. Obama should be making himself more popular by giving everyone HC |
anonymous171 |
Dec-05-09 10:08 PM |
#11 |
| -
There may be some progressive pages & office assistants in the White House, |
Vidar |
Dec-05-09 10:01 PM |
#5 |
| -
Actions speak louder than supposed intelligence or majorities. nt |
anonymous171 |
Dec-05-09 10:02 PM |
#6 |
| -
some people would never ever ever ever ever ever had been happy now matter who won. |
NYC_SKP |
Dec-05-09 10:04 PM |
#7 |
| -
Unless it was politicians who weren't right-wing, or cowards, or |
readmoreoften |
Dec-05-09 10:24 PM |
#24 |
| -
and the system is rigged such that these people have a significant advantage... |
NYC_SKP |
Dec-05-09 10:29 PM |
#27 |
| -
The system IS rigged. Your "choice" is between two |
pokercat999 |
Dec-06-09 08:06 AM |
#50 |
| -
You're right but on the matter of single payer. |
NYC_SKP |
Dec-06-09 09:33 PM |
#54 |
| -
Maybe not, but my point was his priority is not healthcare. |
pokercat999 |
Dec-07-09 05:10 AM |
#59 |
| -
this is sarcasm, right? |
Skittles |
Dec-05-09 10:04 PM |
#8 |
| -
right. |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 10:07 PM |
#10 |
| -
Sorry ..... but that label seems a necessity |
Stinky The Clown |
Dec-05-09 10:11 PM |
#13 |
| -
Definitely. I Unrecced This Before I Realized the OP Was Sarcasm. |
Toasterlad |
Dec-06-09 09:35 AM |
#52 |
| -
hard to tell around here, kentuck |
Skittles |
Dec-05-09 10:20 PM |
#18 |
| -
I know. |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 10:22 PM |
#22 |
| -
Need that label up there . . . |
defendandprotect |
Dec-05-09 10:34 PM |
#35 |
| -
Because the tools in Washington are more concerned about the party than they are with the issues |
Bjorn Against |
Dec-05-09 10:05 PM |
#9 |
| -
Because they'd rather be Republicans? |
gratuitous |
Dec-05-09 10:11 PM |
#12 |
| -
You'd think they can pass at least some of what we wanted them to pass |
Jamastiene |
Dec-05-09 10:13 PM |
#14 |
| -
Snarkasm DU style |
HughMoran |
Dec-05-09 10:16 PM |
#15 |
| -
It's an infuriating lost opportunity |
Lydia Leftcoast |
Dec-05-09 10:17 PM |
#16 |
| -
You're a sly one. |
JohnnyLib2 |
Dec-05-09 10:18 PM |
#17 |
| -
Whatever gets us to look in the mirror... |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 10:21 PM |
#19 |
| -
That whole 5 time deployment soldiers with PTSD, do-nothing congress thing |
readmoreoften |
Dec-05-09 10:21 PM |
#20 |
| -
They'll cheer up after the midterms |
leftstreet |
Dec-05-09 10:22 PM |
#21 |
| -
We are certainly encouraged to be unhappy |
hfojvt |
Dec-05-09 10:23 PM |
#23 |
| -
And what do we hope to accomplish with this moderate majority? |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 10:26 PM |
#25 |
| -
Useless to us; to their corporate paymasters, not so much. |
Jim Sagle |
Dec-05-09 10:30 PM |
#29 |
| -
Give money to banks and insurance companies? |
JVS |
Dec-05-09 10:32 PM |
#32 |
| -
Dissatisfied lefties should simply abandon those messy principles |
Individualist |
Dec-05-09 10:29 PM |
#28 |
| -
Or we can face the reality... |
kentuck |
Dec-05-09 10:32 PM |
#31 |
| -
"Some" . . .? Yes, we all want ponies -- !!! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-05-09 10:31 PM |
#30 |
| -
I will not be happy with the democrat party until they support |
liberal_at_heart |
Dec-05-09 10:33 PM |
#33 |
| -
I don't undersatnd.... |
unkachuck |
Dec-05-09 10:34 PM |
#34 |
| -
well said |
liberal_at_heart |
Dec-05-09 10:35 PM |
#36 |
| -
Exactly. Having power is one thing; |
StarfarerBill |
Dec-06-09 07:56 AM |
#49 |
| -
Most of the dis-satisfaction comes from our equivalent to |
doc03 |
Dec-05-09 10:47 PM |
#37 |
| -
Seen it submitted as a reversal: that the new DU pipers are piping to the new Obama Hamlin |
bridgit |
Dec-05-09 11:12 PM |
#38 |
| -
They dumped the working class and the poor two decades ago. |
ipaint |
Dec-05-09 11:51 PM |
#39 |
| -
Because it isn't doing shit so far and it is being blocked by a bunch of DINOs |
ddeclue |
Dec-05-09 11:52 PM |
#40 |
| -
A majority doesn't exist just to be a majority. |
donco6 |
Dec-05-09 11:58 PM |
#41 |
| -
Because a lot of dems weren't listening last year & not paying attention this year.... |
Tx4obama |
Dec-06-09 12:07 AM |
#43 |
| -
In a sincere response to your sarcasm |
deutsey |
Dec-06-09 05:42 AM |
#44 |
| -
Well said... hear, hear!! |
Flubadubya |
Dec-06-09 07:41 AM |
#46 |
| -
I'm a Democratic and unapologetic about it |
JustAnotherGen |
Dec-06-09 07:24 AM |
#45 |
| -
Yup! |
jpak |
Dec-06-09 07:42 AM |
#47 |
| -
Because the party has become just another corporately controlled party |
MadHound |
Dec-06-09 07:51 AM |
#48 |
| -
I suppose it's not so important to me what numbers we hold in the house and Senate or who occupies |
laughingliberal |
Dec-06-09 08:38 AM |
#51 |
| -
We do not have a progressive in the White House |
proud2BlibKansan |
Dec-06-09 09:37 AM |
#53 |
| -
"Just what do you expect the Democratic Party to do?" |
DireStrike |
Dec-06-09 09:37 PM |
#55 |
| -
I like what you did there. |
Edweird |
Dec-06-09 10:01 PM |
#56 |
| -
I'm a liberal . The Dems are the other side of the same coin |
blues90 |
Dec-06-09 10:06 PM |
#57 |
| -
I'm sorry, but in what poll was Kucinich leading in the primary? |
SemiCharmedQuark |
Dec-07-09 05:13 AM |
#60 |
| -
Because it is nothing more than the party of Wall Street. |
alarimer |
Dec-06-09 10:51 PM |
#58 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread