You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: Nah, we Unrecc'd because you are WHINING about unrecc [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #48
83. Nah, we Unrecc'd because you are WHINING about unrecc
BTW, K&U for ANOTHER bemoaning of the evil unrecc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -So is DU being infiltrated by un-rec trolls who seek to influence our dialogue? Snarkoleptic  Nov-29-09 07:49 PM   #0 
  - Sometimes it looks like someone is wandering around un-reccing everything.  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 07:51 PM   #1 
  - I think it is one or two who just unrec EVERYTHING.  HopeHoops   Nov-29-09 07:51 PM   #2 
  - Thinkin one or two who are still pissed they didn't get Skinner to give in to their demands  havocmom   Nov-29-09 08:25 PM   #42 
     - Well, now Skinner knows what it's like to have teenagers.  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 08:31 PM   #44 
  - KUYASUTNT  Warren Stupidity   Nov-29-09 07:52 PM   #3 
  - I hope that doesn't mean something really important like, the Commies are coming or  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 07:54 PM   #6 
     - oh no! you made me laugh and snort coffee out my nose!!!  sojourner   Nov-29-09 08:09 PM   #27 
        - Its sort of late for coffee - must be west coast.  Warren Stupidity   Nov-29-09 09:02 PM   #57 
        - Hey, sojourner! Good to see you.  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 09:56 PM   #67 
           - hey you!!!  sojourner   Nov-30-09 08:36 PM   #84 
  - They seek to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids. n/t  QC   Nov-29-09 07:52 PM   #4 
  - That's just your wish, QC.  cbayer   Nov-29-09 08:03 PM   #21 
  - Howdy! n/t  QC   Nov-29-09 08:10 PM   #30 
  - OMG, that was a funny film.  TexasObserver   Nov-30-09 12:54 AM   #81 
  - I unrecced this thread because I only unrec threads  MineralMan   Nov-29-09 07:53 PM   #5 
  - How sad that so many have to go to the "great page" to see what others  question everything   Nov-29-09 07:58 PM   #14 
  - Unrec  Gman   Nov-29-09 07:54 PM   #7 
  - K&U on principle. Take it up with Skinner.  Vickers   Nov-29-09 07:54 PM   #8 
  - Not complaining about the feature here. Wondering about unrec trolls.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 07:56 PM   #11 
  - Give me a list of Unrec trolls.  Vickers   Nov-29-09 07:57 PM   #13 
  - Just asking a question. Is this a problem?  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 07:59 PM   #15 
     - Not a problem... I also asked a question which thus far has not been answered.  Vickers   Nov-29-09 08:03 PM   #20 
     - That's the nature of my OP.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:15 PM   #38 
        - Rec is ALSO anonymous...how do you feel about that?  Vickers   Nov-29-09 08:22 PM   #41 
           - As I said, I'm all for the unrec. feature.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:34 PM   #45 
              - "low-post-count heavy un-rec users" How do you fucking KNOW?  Vickers   Nov-29-09 09:10 PM   #62 
     - calling Duers trolls IS against the rules.  uppityperson   Nov-29-09 08:45 PM   #50 
  - So only trolls can disagree with an op  MissDeeds   Nov-29-09 08:04 PM   #23 
  - Wonderful. Let's have a list of what one may or may not say  question everything   Nov-29-09 08:00 PM   #16 
  - You consider Unrec'ing undemocratic?  Vickers   Nov-29-09 08:05 PM   #24 
  - +1  laconicsax   Nov-29-09 08:00 PM   #18 
  - been here long enough to know better.....but sometimes i do`t  madrchsod   Nov-29-09 07:54 PM   #9 
  - Who cares?  neverforget   Nov-29-09 07:56 PM   #10 
  - Not necessarily. There are some who, as a matter of principle  question everything   Nov-29-09 07:56 PM   #12 
  - 'Which is why I recommend everything - almost everything - that has "less than 0." '  Vickers   Nov-29-09 08:00 PM   #17 
  - I agree.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:10 PM   #33 
  - What about all of the  Ms. Toad   Nov-29-09 09:20 PM   #64 
  - And then I spot this thread...  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:00 PM   #19 
  - I'll bet Repukes are to blame for the anti-Obama promotion around here  Sarah Ibarruri   Nov-29-09 08:03 PM   #22 
  - Actually, we are in on it.  cbayer   Nov-29-09 08:08 PM   #25 
  - Now you've gone and done it...  SidDithers   Nov-29-09 08:10 PM   #34 
  - UMMMMM!  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 08:11 PM   #35 
  - heh  uppityperson   Nov-29-09 08:47 PM   #51 
  - So here's the daily thread about the vast right wing conspiracy  superduperfarleft   Nov-29-09 08:08 PM   #26 
  - Daily? They're practically hourly. (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-29-09 08:15 PM   #37 
  - Which discussion worthy threads have been aggressively unrec'ed?  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 08:09 PM   #28 
  - The converrgence of "unrec" and "tinfoil"  ashling   Nov-29-09 08:09 PM   #29 
  - Oh for God's sake.  ohheckyeah   Nov-29-09 08:10 PM   #31 
  - DU is full of people obsessed  Raine   Nov-29-09 08:10 PM   #32 
  - They've lied to themselves to the point where they're convinced unrec is oppressive. (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-29-09 08:14 PM   #36 
     - Why would you say "lie"? I think part of the deal is, we only have a very few  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 08:19 PM   #40 
        - Because they're repeating demonstrably false statements. (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-29-09 08:57 PM   #55 
           - Really? Which ones are those?  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 09:06 PM   #59 
              - There's several, but any that get within a lightyear of the word "censorship" rank highly. (nt)  Posteritatis   Nov-29-09 10:41 PM   #75 
  - What?  ashling   Nov-29-09 08:16 PM   #39 
  - It looks that way  BanzaiBonnie   Nov-29-09 08:29 PM   #43 
  - If so.....  Fla_Democrat   Nov-29-09 08:41 PM   #46 
  - Nah, the OP was unrec'd by those who wrongly thought I was against the unrec feature itself.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:42 PM   #48 
     - Nah, we Unrecc'd because you are WHINING about unrecc  mtnester   Nov-30-09 04:16 AM   #83 
  - Yup, since around May 4, 2007...nt  SidDithers   Nov-29-09 08:41 PM   #47 
  - This thread itself refutes the OPs arguement.  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 08:45 PM   #49 
  - People are discussing this thread rather than doing a drive-by unrec.  Snarkoleptic   Nov-29-09 08:54 PM   #53 
     - If a thread has little to no discussion, it's probably just not that interesting to many here.  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 09:18 PM   #63 
  - How does unrec "influence our dialogue"? this thread has unrecs, yet I can still read and reply and  uppityperson   Nov-29-09 08:49 PM   #52 
  - It doesn't change the dialogue.  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 08:55 PM   #54 
     - Well, that's what the feature was intended to do and it seems to work well.  EFerrari   Nov-29-09 09:09 PM   #61 
     - Ditto. n/t  Ms. Toad   Nov-29-09 09:23 PM   #65 
  - I fergit: Have I UnrecKKKed THIS thread?!1 n/t  UTUSN   Nov-29-09 08:59 PM   #56 
  - K&U  Morning Dew   Nov-29-09 09:02 PM   #58 
  - I'm not concerned - the "unrekkers" don't seem to have much effect  Canuckistanian   Nov-29-09 09:09 PM   #60 
  - I don't get the concern with unrec, its not like it erases the post. nt  snagglepuss   Nov-29-09 10:01 PM   #68 
  - I'm going to rec this thread, simply because I'm contrary....n/t  unkachuck   Nov-29-09 09:34 PM   #66 
  - Me 2  notesdev   Nov-29-09 10:39 PM   #73 
  - In reply:  MilesColtrane   Nov-29-09 10:03 PM   #69 
  - I dunno but I always unrec those who whine about unrec  yodoobo   Nov-29-09 10:29 PM   #70 
  - Wait -- wasn't UnRec supposed to be a Troll deterrent?  omega minimo   Nov-29-09 10:31 PM   #71 
  - To cut down the drive by recs of flame bait threads.  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 10:40 PM   #74 
  - I don't know, but I don't like the un-rec button, so far. NT  juajen   Nov-29-09 10:38 PM   #72 
  - Another conspiracy?  Lagomorph   Nov-29-09 10:55 PM   #76 
  - No.  aikoaiko   Nov-30-09 12:05 AM   #77 
  - I think posting has more influence on the dialogue  NYC Liberal   Nov-30-09 12:09 AM   #78 
  - I feel virtually certain that the Duke lacrosse team is involved.  saltpoint   Nov-30-09 12:10 AM   #79 
  - un-rec  TexasObserver   Nov-30-09 12:52 AM   #80 
  - k i c k  defendandprotect   Nov-30-09 03:21 AM   #82 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC