Vickers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Nov-29-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 20. Not a problem... I also asked a question which thus far has not been answered. |
|
Give me a list of Professional Unrec Trolls© and then I'll give your concern a little more weight. I'm sure Skinner et al will be happy to provide you with a list of people who have Unrec'ed, say, 10 or more threads a day. Wait...you HAVE voiced your concerns to TPTB, right? 
|
| -So is DU being infiltrated by un-rec trolls who seek to influence our dialogue? |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 07:49 PM |
#0 |
-
Sometimes it looks like someone is wandering around un-reccing everything. |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 07:51 PM |
#1 |
-
I think it is one or two who just unrec EVERYTHING. |
HopeHoops |
Nov-29-09 07:51 PM |
#2 |
 -
Thinkin one or two who are still pissed they didn't get Skinner to give in to their demands |
havocmom |
Nov-29-09 08:25 PM |
#42 |
-
Well, now Skinner knows what it's like to have teenagers. |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 08:31 PM |
#44 |
-
KUYASUTNT |
Warren Stupidity |
Nov-29-09 07:52 PM |
#3 |
 -
I hope that doesn't mean something really important like, the Commies are coming or |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 07:54 PM |
#6 |
-
oh no! you made me laugh and snort coffee out my nose!!! |
sojourner |
Nov-29-09 08:09 PM |
#27 |
-
Its sort of late for coffee - must be west coast. |
Warren Stupidity |
Nov-29-09 09:02 PM |
#57 |
-
Hey, sojourner! Good to see you. |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 09:56 PM |
#67 |
-
hey you!!! |
sojourner |
Nov-30-09 08:36 PM |
#84 |
-
They seek to sap and impurify our precious bodily fluids. n/t |
QC |
Nov-29-09 07:52 PM |
#4 |
 -
That's just your wish, QC. |
cbayer |
Nov-29-09 08:03 PM |
#21 |
  -
Howdy! n/t |
QC |
Nov-29-09 08:10 PM |
#30 |
 -
OMG, that was a funny film. |
TexasObserver |
Nov-30-09 12:54 AM |
#81 |
-
I unrecced this thread because I only unrec threads |
MineralMan |
Nov-29-09 07:53 PM |
#5 |
 -
How sad that so many have to go to the "great page" to see what others |
question everything |
Nov-29-09 07:58 PM |
#14 |
-
Unrec |
Gman |
Nov-29-09 07:54 PM |
#7 |
-
K&U on principle. Take it up with Skinner. |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 07:54 PM |
#8 |
 -
Not complaining about the feature here. Wondering about unrec trolls. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 07:56 PM |
#11 |
  -
Give me a list of Unrec trolls. |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 07:57 PM |
#13 |
   -
Just asking a question. Is this a problem? |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 07:59 PM |
#15 |
  -
Not a problem... I also asked a question which thus far has not been answered. |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 08:03 PM |
#20 |
   -
That's the nature of my OP. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:15 PM |
#38 |
  -
Rec is ALSO anonymous...how do you feel about that? |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 08:22 PM |
#41 |
  -
As I said, I'm all for the unrec. feature. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:34 PM |
#45 |
  -
"low-post-count heavy un-rec users" How do you fucking KNOW? |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 09:10 PM |
#62 |
  -
calling Duers trolls IS against the rules. |
uppityperson |
Nov-29-09 08:45 PM |
#50 |
  -
So only trolls can disagree with an op |
MissDeeds |
Nov-29-09 08:04 PM |
#23 |
 -
Wonderful. Let's have a list of what one may or may not say |
question everything |
Nov-29-09 08:00 PM |
#16 |
  -
You consider Unrec'ing undemocratic? |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 08:05 PM |
#24 |
 -
+1 |
laconicsax |
Nov-29-09 08:00 PM |
#18 |
-
been here long enough to know better.....but sometimes i do`t |
madrchsod |
Nov-29-09 07:54 PM |
#9 |
-
Who cares? |
neverforget |
Nov-29-09 07:56 PM |
#10 |
-
Not necessarily. There are some who, as a matter of principle |
question everything |
Nov-29-09 07:56 PM |
#12 |
 -
'Which is why I recommend everything - almost everything - that has "less than 0." ' |
Vickers |
Nov-29-09 08:00 PM |
#17 |
 -
I agree. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:10 PM |
#33 |
 -
What about all of the |
Ms. Toad |
Nov-29-09 09:20 PM |
#64 |
-
And then I spot this thread... |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:00 PM |
#19 |
-
I'll bet Repukes are to blame for the anti-Obama promotion around here |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Nov-29-09 08:03 PM |
#22 |
-
Actually, we are in on it. |
cbayer |
Nov-29-09 08:08 PM |
#25 |
 -
Now you've gone and done it... |
SidDithers |
Nov-29-09 08:10 PM |
#34 |
 -
UMMMMM! |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 08:11 PM |
#35 |
 -
heh |
uppityperson |
Nov-29-09 08:47 PM |
#51 |
-
So here's the daily thread about the vast right wing conspiracy |
superduperfarleft |
Nov-29-09 08:08 PM |
#26 |
 -
Daily? They're practically hourly. (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-29-09 08:15 PM |
#37 |
-
Which discussion worthy threads have been aggressively unrec'ed? |
Kaleva |
Nov-29-09 08:09 PM |
#28 |
-
The converrgence of "unrec" and "tinfoil" |
ashling |
Nov-29-09 08:09 PM |
#29 |
-
Oh for God's sake. |
ohheckyeah |
Nov-29-09 08:10 PM |
#31 |
-
DU is full of people obsessed |
Raine |
Nov-29-09 08:10 PM |
#32 |
 -
They've lied to themselves to the point where they're convinced unrec is oppressive. (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-29-09 08:14 PM |
#36 |
-
Why would you say "lie"? I think part of the deal is, we only have a very few |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 08:19 PM |
#40 |
-
Because they're repeating demonstrably false statements. (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-29-09 08:57 PM |
#55 |
-
Really? Which ones are those? |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 09:06 PM |
#59 |
-
There's several, but any that get within a lightyear of the word "censorship" rank highly. (nt) |
Posteritatis |
Nov-29-09 10:41 PM |
#75 |
-
What? |
ashling |
Nov-29-09 08:16 PM |
#39 |
-
It looks that way |
BanzaiBonnie |
Nov-29-09 08:29 PM |
#43 |
-
If so..... |
Fla_Democrat |
Nov-29-09 08:41 PM |
#46 |
 -
Nah, the OP was unrec'd by those who wrongly thought I was against the unrec feature itself. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:42 PM |
#48 |
-
Nah, we Unrecc'd because you are WHINING about unrecc |
mtnester |
Nov-30-09 04:16 AM |
#83 |
-
Yup, since around May 4, 2007...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-29-09 08:41 PM |
#47 |
-
This thread itself refutes the OPs arguement. |
Kaleva |
Nov-29-09 08:45 PM |
#49 |
 -
People are discussing this thread rather than doing a drive-by unrec. |
Snarkoleptic |
Nov-29-09 08:54 PM |
#53 |
-
If a thread has little to no discussion, it's probably just not that interesting to many here. |
Kaleva |
Nov-29-09 09:18 PM |
#63 |
-
How does unrec "influence our dialogue"? this thread has unrecs, yet I can still read and reply and |
uppityperson |
Nov-29-09 08:49 PM |
#52 |
 -
It doesn't change the dialogue. |
Kaleva |
Nov-29-09 08:55 PM |
#54 |
-
Well, that's what the feature was intended to do and it seems to work well. |
EFerrari |
Nov-29-09 09:09 PM |
#61 |
-
Ditto. n/t |
Ms. Toad |
Nov-29-09 09:23 PM |
#65 |
-
I fergit: Have I UnrecKKKed THIS thread?!1 n/t |
UTUSN |
Nov-29-09 08:59 PM |
#56 |
-
K&U |
Morning Dew |
Nov-29-09 09:02 PM |
#58 |
-
I'm not concerned - the "unrekkers" don't seem to have much effect |
Canuckistanian |
Nov-29-09 09:09 PM |
#60 |
 -
I don't get the concern with unrec, its not like it erases the post. nt |
snagglepuss |
Nov-29-09 10:01 PM |
#68 |
-
I'm going to rec this thread, simply because I'm contrary....n/t |
unkachuck |
Nov-29-09 09:34 PM |
#66 |
 -
Me 2 |
notesdev |
Nov-29-09 10:39 PM |
#73 |
-
In reply: |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-29-09 10:03 PM |
#69 |
-
I dunno but I always unrec those who whine about unrec |
yodoobo |
Nov-29-09 10:29 PM |
#70 |
-
Wait -- wasn't UnRec supposed to be a Troll deterrent? |
omega minimo |
Nov-29-09 10:31 PM |
#71 |
 -
To cut down the drive by recs of flame bait threads. |
Kaleva |
Nov-29-09 10:40 PM |
#74 |
-
I don't know, but I don't like the un-rec button, so far. NT |
juajen |
Nov-29-09 10:38 PM |
#72 |
-
Another conspiracy? |
Lagomorph |
Nov-29-09 10:55 PM |
#76 |
-
No. |
aikoaiko |
Nov-30-09 12:05 AM |
#77 |
-
I think posting has more influence on the dialogue |
NYC Liberal |
Nov-30-09 12:09 AM |
#78 |
-
I feel virtually certain that the Duke lacrosse team is involved. |
saltpoint |
Nov-30-09 12:10 AM |
#79 |
-
un-rec |
TexasObserver |
Nov-30-09 12:52 AM |
#80 |
-
k i c k |
defendandprotect |
Nov-30-09 03:21 AM |
#82 |