You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #160: good job, doc [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
160. good job, doc
I see my ignore list has come out for this one too. ;)
They're an ignorant bunch of anti-science people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Will you be ashamed? The Doctor.  Nov-29-09 01:27 AM   #0 
  - Unrec for unempirical histrionics  Dreamer Tatum   Nov-29-09 01:33 AM   #1 
  - No, you won't. These things are happening *NOW*.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:38 AM   #3 
     - So, it's happening *NOW*, but you're warning me about 50 years from now  Dreamer Tatum   Nov-29-09 01:44 AM   #8 
     - Empty?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:49 AM   #10 
     - Please, Doctor. Do you know with whom you are debating?  Greyhound   Nov-29-09 04:09 AM   #17 
     - In case you don't know, Doc, you're arguing with one named after a fictional football player who...  11 Bravo   Nov-30-09 09:14 PM   #179 
        - Well... isn't that sumpin'  The Doctor.   Dec-06-09 07:40 PM   #203 
     - EMPTY? what world are you living in?  sojourner   Nov-29-09 10:10 AM   #59 
        - It's bringing them out nicely.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:13 AM   #64 
           - i know. posted on a different topic and could not believe number of DUers who came out .  sojourner   Nov-29-09 10:21 AM   #68 
           - I guess I'm not a good enough person not to wish them harm, then.  Zhade   Nov-30-09 11:25 PM   #186 
           - I'm FURIOUS. They've helped destroy my son's future.  Zhade   Nov-30-09 11:24 PM   #185 
     - Even if we do something it won't look the as it does now. Be real.  Better Today   Nov-29-09 02:29 AM   #13 
  - I'm childless, therefore grandchildless. You WILL forget that.  NoSheep   Nov-29-09 01:37 AM   #2 
  - This IS to the freepers.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:40 AM   #5 
  - I guess you do! btw, your subject line didn't warn me you were talking to freepers.  NoSheep   Nov-29-09 01:44 AM   #7 
  - Sorry... I thought the part about the denialists was enough.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:46 AM   #9 
     - No need - There's enough denialists on DU  Dead_Parrot   Nov-29-09 03:18 AM   #16 
        - I'm shocked at the numbers just in this thread.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:53 AM   #52 
  - I think it's a safe assumption that you are speaking to us because you put it on  tavalon   Nov-29-09 03:04 AM   #15 
  - Apologies...  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:16 AM   #21 
  - Yes.  LWolf   Nov-29-09 09:40 AM   #43 
     - Is that a joke?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:42 AM   #46 
        - It's not a joke.  LWolf   Nov-29-09 10:04 AM   #54 
        - Did you really just ask that?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:15 AM   #66 
           - Yes. I think you should post this at FR, since that's where your audience is. nt  LWolf   Nov-29-09 10:46 AM   #84 
              - So there are no trolls or deniers on DU, huh.  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 10:15 AM   #163 
        - they walk among us. they 'claim' democratic values but they drank the kool-aid  sojourner   Nov-29-09 10:13 AM   #63 
  - I don't know about that...  Quantess   Nov-29-09 02:08 AM   #12 
  - +1  ShortnFiery   Nov-30-09 11:27 PM   #187 
  - I'll forget this op rather quickly.  emilyg   Nov-29-09 01:38 AM   #4 
  - Soooo... you don't believe Climate Change and the deniers are a problem?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:41 AM   #6 
  - What OP?  obliviously   Nov-29-09 09:49 AM   #51 
  - Well, if the "they" you speak of are 20 somethings.  lapfog_1   Nov-29-09 02:07 AM   #11 
  - Right now, today, I am much more concerned about shame regarding HCR and the issue  Better Today   Nov-29-09 03:01 AM   #14 
  - it's fairly guaranteed, then  MH1   Dec-02-09 08:11 PM   #196 
  - Nope. It is what it is and it shall be what it becomes.  cali   Nov-29-09 04:13 AM   #18 
  - This is an example of why the undecideds will break against global warming action. So over the top  timeforpeace   Nov-29-09 05:21 AM   #19 
  - If someone makes up their mind based on a post like this,  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:24 AM   #23 
     - If your OP was directed at freepers  Morning Dew   Nov-29-09 12:41 PM   #115 
        - It is. They're here.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:49 PM   #121 
  - Maybe a little geological perspective will help you.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 09:00 AM   #20 
  - Interesting.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:20 AM   #22 
     - I see. "Scientifically literate", but no clue about Geology.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 09:41 AM   #45 
        - 'No clue' indeed.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:48 AM   #50 
           - The earth is approx. 4.5 billion years old. Rapid geological events take place over thousands or  Edweird   Nov-29-09 10:43 AM   #81 
              - Wow.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:53 AM   #87 
                 - LOL. Cognitive dissonance much?  Edweird   Nov-29-09 11:17 AM   #97 
                 - So because YOU can't find an example of what's occurring now ever  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:23 AM   #101 
                    - It appears that your concept of 'scientific literacy' means calling those that use facts ignorant.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 11:48 AM   #107 
                       - LMAO! Wow. No, I call people that IGNORE the facts 'ignorant'. The way you've just  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:33 PM   #111 
                       - I'm providing actual facts and data to support my position, and all you are  Edweird   Nov-29-09 01:29 PM   #126 
                       - Yet not one of those 'facts and data' addresses the point.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 05:50 PM   #143 
                       - Just as I thought. You got nothin'. No facts. Just jackin' your jaw. How pathetic.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 05:56 PM   #145 
                          - According to your graphs, I'm exactly right. Thanks.  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 11:38 AM   #169 
                             - Blah blah blah. Where's the evidence of an anomaly? Just saying it doesn't make it so.  Edweird   Nov-30-09 10:03 PM   #182 
                                - Ok, got it...  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 10:13 PM   #183 
                                   - So you don't have evidence of an anomaly then? You keep posturing and spouting off, but no data...  Edweird   Dec-04-09 05:41 PM   #197 
                       - No, you're not. At all.  Zhade   Nov-30-09 11:29 PM   #188 
                          - "fucking liar"? Prove it!  Edweird   Dec-02-09 07:59 PM   #194 
                       - That's what I thought. Here's 420k years of ice samples  Edweird   Nov-29-09 02:43 PM   #131 
                       - Sorry, but your graph isn't convincing me to change my mind about climate change.  Quantess   Nov-29-09 04:31 PM   #136 
                          - Yeah, I know. It's only geology and all that.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 05:00 PM   #139 
                             - Calm down, please. I have done nothing of the sort.  Quantess   Nov-29-09 05:07 PM   #140 
                                - I'm calm :)  Edweird   Nov-29-09 05:38 PM   #142 
                                   - I'm not out to attack anyone who puts up a scientifically based rationale for questioning the OP  Quantess   Nov-29-09 05:54 PM   #144 
                                      - That's the thing. If you only focus on the last 50-100-200 years, you're not getting the whole  Edweird   Nov-29-09 06:01 PM   #146 
                                         - Sure, but how else can a graph emphasize the changes brought about  Quantess   Nov-29-09 06:06 PM   #147 
                                            - The graph shows CO2 rise followed by temperature rise, with a fall in both  Edweird   Nov-29-09 06:20 PM   #150 
                                               - The argument you are making is ridiculous. Essentially you are arguing that since  Imperialism Inc.   Nov-29-09 09:37 PM   #155 
                                                  - Sorry, but it takes more than "I'm right and you're wrong because you're stupid" or whatever.  Edweird   Nov-30-09 01:10 AM   #158 
                                                  - Well ain't you a one-trick pony.  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 10:24 AM   #164 
                                                  - When you have some, you know, SCIENCE to support your position, let me know.  Edweird   Nov-30-09 06:20 PM   #174 
                                                  - You might want to whip out a dictionary and look up the meaning of ignorant.  Imperialism Inc.   Nov-30-09 03:01 PM   #172 
                                                  - So, where's the evidence? All you're doing is crying about how the science doesn't support your  Edweird   Nov-30-09 06:10 PM   #173 
                 - The very same  billh58   Nov-29-09 04:21 PM   #133 
  - delete  Tejas   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #24 
  - I'm shocked at the number of scientifically illiterate folks here on DU.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:34 AM   #40 
     - Gosh, nothing like a condescending jerk to cheer people up.  Tejas   Nov-29-09 09:37 AM   #42 
        - I don't tolerate willfully ignorant people. If you feel I'm behaving intolerantly,  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:47 AM   #48 
  - Climate Change Deniers; Will you be ashamed?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #25 
  - Projection  notesdev   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #26 
  - What's with defending the deniers?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #29 
     - Absolutely not, and your choice of words is quite offensive  notesdev   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #32 
     - WTF are you talking about? Why are you talking about the Holocaust now?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #36 
     - He IS a denier  PaulaFarrell   Nov-29-09 10:49 AM   #86 
     - Managed to nab a bunch of them here.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:08 AM   #93 
     - ...take a good guess...  Quantess   Nov-29-09 04:35 PM   #137 
  - you already posted this.  cali   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #27 
  - A few people couldn't be bothered to recognize toward whom this was directed.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #28 
     - I don't think people here have sympathy for the deniers so much as  cali   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #31 
        - Well then;  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:01 AM   #53 
           - No. I'm saying you didn't put it well.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:07 AM   #56 
              - Ok, after you've re-written all of  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:19 AM   #67 
                 - What I'd love to know is how you live and what you're doing  cali   Nov-29-09 10:26 AM   #71 
                    - Change the subject much?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:38 AM   #78 
                       - now you're just babbling idiotically, sweetie.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:45 AM   #83 
                          - ???  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:04 AM   #92 
  - Difference between deny it and the cause of it (nt)  The Straight Story   Nov-29-09 09:30 AM   #30 
  - blah blah if you disagree with me you're ignirent blah blah you're illitirit blah blah blah  imdjh   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #33 
  - That's what funny about deniers; they think this is about identity, not science.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:40 AM   #44 
  - you may be scientifically literate but you ought to work on your  cali   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #34 
  - I tend to consider my target audience.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #38 
  - lol. defensive, huh? good. you should be.  cali   Nov-29-09 09:47 AM   #49 
     - Wow... another person that can't tell the difference between 'defensive' and 'offensive'.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:08 AM   #57 
        - oh, I can tell the difference. you, oth......  cali   Nov-29-09 10:12 AM   #62 
           - Why be so defensive?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:23 AM   #69 
              - "only hypocrites cannot forgive hypocrisy"  cali   Nov-29-09 10:29 AM   #73 
                 - No, of course you haven't been.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:43 AM   #80 
                    - continuing the fail, I see.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:44 AM   #82 
                       - Because you can't be substantive.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:00 AM   #90 
                          - let me ask you a substantive question:  cali   Nov-29-09 11:11 AM   #95 
                             - Neither.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:18 AM   #98 
                                - I disagree, but you've made it clear that your op was ill stated  cali   Nov-29-09 11:22 AM   #100 
                                   - That might be a fair clarification...  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:28 AM   #103 
                                      - seems to me that 'B' fits that criteria  cali   Nov-29-09 11:33 AM   #104 
                                         - Another unknown.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:41 PM   #116 
  - A grammar flame? Really? Quit posting stupid stuff Cali.  Tutankhamun   Nov-29-09 10:12 AM   #61 
     - I'll post what I please, dear.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:13 AM   #65 
        - It's inane and only serves to add "noise" while reducing the level of discourse.  Tutankhamun   Nov-29-09 10:31 AM   #74 
  - Here's your science. Have fun.  Edweird   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #35 
  - IS that like, "Don't adjust your TV set."? Cause the big picture is out of your control?  imdjh   Nov-29-09 09:31 AM   #37 
  - Time will tell  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 10:42 AM   #79 
  - It already has;  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:12 AM   #96 
     - A symptom is not a diagnosis  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 11:20 AM   #99 
        - Oh, because I didn't spend an hour pulling together the THOUSANDS of examples,  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:26 AM   #102 
           - Calling me  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 11:40 AM   #105 
              - How typical. You're ignorant, not necessarily stupid. Do you know the difference?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:45 PM   #119 
                 - Aha so not agreeing with you  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 02:32 PM   #130 
                    - Uninformed.  Quantess   Nov-29-09 04:25 PM   #135 
                    - Lovely  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 07:06 PM   #151 
                       - The "dumb" part is something you added, yourself.  Quantess   Nov-29-09 07:21 PM   #152 
                          - If only the science were settled......  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-29-09 07:23 PM   #153 
                             - I take it back. The word I was looking for was "misinformed".  Quantess   Nov-29-09 07:47 PM   #154 
                    - You have any idea how transparent you are?  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 09:48 AM   #161 
                       - So you're right  knightinwhitesatin   Nov-30-09 06:38 PM   #177 
                          - That's what you're not getting... you're not 'debating' at all.  The Doctor.   Dec-05-09 10:09 PM   #198 
  - Is being a  billh58   Nov-29-09 05:28 PM   #141 
     - Your point is very well taken.  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 11:13 AM   #165 
  - ClimateOMFGChange was a nice trendy fad,  Tejas   Nov-29-09 09:33 AM   #39 
  - A "nice trendy fad" that's "over"?  Tutankhamun   Nov-29-09 10:08 AM   #58 
     - "overwhelming majority of the world's scientists" - nice hyperbole there  Tejas   Nov-29-09 01:32 PM   #127 
        - What's so hyperbolic about that? It's true.  Quantess   Nov-29-09 04:40 PM   #138 
           - 4*C rise will wipe out BILLIONS  Tejas   Dec-01-09 08:51 AM   #193 
  - I honestly don't understand  LWolf   Nov-29-09 09:37 AM   #41 
  - Plenty of them;  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:11 AM   #60 
  - Good lord, just read this thread! Denial isn't just a river in Fresno.  Flaneur   Nov-29-09 12:29 PM   #110 
  - I wish this was on paper. I could line a catbox with it!  obliviously   Nov-29-09 09:46 AM   #47 
  - Wow... your mindlessness is impressive. User-name well-chosen!  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:04 AM   #55 
  - Your OP is spot on. To say that the overwhelmng majority of scientists are wrong,  Tutankhamun   Nov-29-09 10:24 AM   #70 
     - Thanks.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:27 AM   #72 
  - I wouldn't want to subject my cat to it.  NaturalHigh   Dec-05-09 10:38 PM   #200 
  - +1,000,000,000,000  Odin2005   Nov-29-09 10:35 AM   #75 
  - If I had grandchildren, I'd tell them salmon tasted okay, nothing great  NoPasaran   Nov-29-09 10:35 AM   #76 
  - lol. best response of the miserable thread.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:38 AM   #77 
  - Yeah, all those climate change pushers and their 'holier-than-thou' attitudes!  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 10:49 AM   #85 
     - This thread is obvious flamebait  NoPasaran   Nov-29-09 10:55 AM   #88 
     - Funny... the only ones it targeted are AGW *deniers*.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:02 AM   #91 
     - I'm finding your high dudgeon most amusing.  cali   Nov-29-09 10:55 AM   #89 
        - Ummm.... really?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 11:10 AM   #94 
  - Serious question. What is the optimum temperature for the earth?  Synicus Maximus   Nov-29-09 11:47 AM   #106 
  - the optimium temperature of the earth  Prometheuspan   Nov-29-09 12:39 PM   #114 
  - I think you mean 'optimal' for human-friendly climate.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:56 PM   #122 
  - I have no children  varelse   Nov-29-09 11:59 AM   #108 
  - They won't be sheltered and protected though  Lorien   Nov-29-09 12:36 PM   #113 
  - In the short term, they will be shielded  varelse   Nov-29-09 12:46 PM   #120 
  - the chicken littles don't care  Tejas   Nov-29-09 01:35 PM   #128 
     - Barking up the wrong tree if you think I'm ever llikely to land in the denial camp  varelse   Nov-29-09 03:49 PM   #132 
     - So what are you going to tell your grandchildren?  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 11:48 AM   #170 
  - ttt  Blue_Tires   Nov-29-09 12:00 PM   #109 
  - I wanted kids but didn't have them because my best friend's father is a  Lorien   Nov-29-09 12:35 PM   #112 
  - Climate Change is real but your predictions are stupid. nt  anonymous171   Nov-29-09 12:42 PM   #117 
  - They are not 'my' predictions. They are simple projections based on current trends.  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 12:58 PM   #123 
     - OK, explain how mass famines in the first world are going to become commonplace?  anonymous171   Nov-29-09 12:59 PM   #124 
        - Right... screw the balance of humanity. We got ours, right?  The Doctor.   Nov-29-09 01:21 PM   #125 
           - If anything, your predictions are understated  depakid   Nov-30-09 01:18 AM   #159 
              - The REALLY frightening part;  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 10:10 AM   #162 
  - the solution to the problem being...  Prometheuspan   Nov-29-09 12:42 PM   #118 
  - I don't believe some denialists will be ashamed for two reasons.  Uncle Joe   Nov-29-09 01:49 PM   #129 
  - Nope.  Iggo   Nov-29-09 04:23 PM   #134 
  - I forget what I was going to say  WilliamPitt   Nov-29-09 06:09 PM   #148 
  - No.  JVS   Nov-29-09 06:12 PM   #149 
  - I'm not in denial. I just think it's too late to reverse the changes.  Kaleva   Nov-29-09 09:51 PM   #156 
  - Wouldn't that include changing the behaviors that exacerbate Climate Change?  omega minimo   Dec-01-09 01:16 AM   #190 
  - this post is upsetting for NON deniers too  BlancheSplanchnik   Nov-29-09 10:09 PM   #157 
  - Can you imagine if everyone did as you do?  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 11:21 AM   #167 
     - no, no family whatsoever....  BlancheSplanchnik   Dec-01-09 07:51 AM   #192 
  - good job, doc  Duppers   Nov-30-09 01:36 AM   #160 
  - Seriously...  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 11:14 AM   #166 
  - Since I'm not a climate-change denier...  derby378   Nov-30-09 11:26 AM   #168 
  - so agree with me or your stupid, is that about right?  crazyjoe   Nov-30-09 12:07 PM   #171 
  - No, that's ignorant.  The Doctor.   Nov-30-09 09:02 PM   #178 
  - if the cap fits..  G_j   Nov-30-09 09:20 PM   #180 
  - "Don't forget this post. Ever."  Blue-Jay   Nov-30-09 06:21 PM   #175 
  - *Ever*!!  Bluebear   Nov-30-09 09:22 PM   #181 
  - Honestly, I don't know how anyone can deny it.  JNelson6563   Nov-30-09 06:25 PM   #176 
  - They better fucking be.  Zhade   Nov-30-09 11:19 PM   #184 
  - Or maybe, as we fish for salmon, I will tell them of the flappy armed death cultists of yesteryear.  Throd   Nov-30-09 11:55 PM   #189 
  - No. Because I don't have children.  REP   Dec-01-09 02:44 AM   #191 
  - k & r n/t  R. P. McMurphy   Dec-02-09 08:05 PM   #195 
  - I do not believe that human activity is causing climate change.  NaturalHigh   Dec-05-09 10:33 PM   #199 
  - Blah, blah, blah.  Zavulon   Dec-05-09 10:53 PM   #201 
  - "I don't do my best to stop it."  NaturalHigh   Dec-06-09 12:57 AM   #202 
     - You're on, friend.  Zavulon   Dec-06-09 11:06 PM   #205 
  - This just in: India STILL doesn't care.  Tejas   Dec-06-09 09:22 PM   #204 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC