| 177. No. Not regardless. Only for right wingers. These are the only people you jump out on behalf of. |
|
If I'm wrong, link me to a post of yours in which you defend a liberal's First Amendment rights as vehemently.
|
| -Politics or sedition? Rush Limbaugh calls for military coup |
L. Coyote |
Nov-28-09 12:32 AM |
#0 |
 -
I don't think wishing something would happen meets the level necessary for prosecution. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 12:36 AM |
#1 |
 -
It really doesn't. But repeating it over and over normalizes the thought. |
EFerrari |
Nov-28-09 12:41 AM |
#2 |
| -
True. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 12:46 AM |
#3 |
| -
Yep. I don't know about the ethics of using public airwaves |
EFerrari |
Nov-28-09 01:07 AM |
#9 |
| -
There you go again, |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 01:21 AM |
#20 |
 -
Happy TG Day, bleever! |
EFerrari |
Nov-28-09 01:32 AM |
#36 |
| -
And to you too. |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 01:46 AM |
#52 |
| -
Of course, Rush is force fed to the troops via |
tblue37 |
Nov-28-09 06:03 AM |
#82 |
| -
Maybe "valorized" is a better word. Ug -- lee. |
EFerrari |
Nov-28-09 10:59 AM |
#89 |
| -
Do thye force feed that fact that he is a chickenhawk? |
jasi2006 |
Nov-29-09 01:08 AM |
#208 |
| -
WHY ARE SOME DEFENDING THUGS |
HowHasItComeToThis |
Nov-28-09 01:27 AM |
#27 |
| -
Why are some "who" defending thugs? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:31 AM |
#32 |
| -
Because "Ignored" is one of them? |
Lorien |
Nov-28-09 06:10 PM |
#117 |
| -
People, people. YOU CAN'T ALERT ON IGNORED POSTS! How do you think RW trolls get to survive so long? |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:35 PM |
#193 |
| -
^^^exactally |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Nov-28-09 12:49 PM |
#100 |
| -
The term "wishing" refers to a silent mental activity -- |
iamtechus |
Nov-28-09 01:04 AM |
#8 |
| -
The article referred to it as expressed hope. It does stretch his words to say he is urging anyone. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:13 AM |
#10 |
| -
two words: |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:17 AM |
#13 |
| -
"It held that government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 01:24 AM |
#23 |
| -
there are three triggers |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:36 AM |
#40 |
| -
Brandenberg is not the relevant case law here. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 12:20 PM |
#98 |
| -
So you believe a military coup is imminent specifically because of limbaugh's hope? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:33 PM |
#138 |
| -
Limbaugh is trying to incite violence, trawling for assassins--military or otherwise-- |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:45 PM |
#146 |
| -
Let's see the quote in which he specifically calls for violence against our President? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:47 PM |
#148 |
| -
To "detain" the President |
mix |
Nov-28-09 08:19 PM |
#161 |
| -
Except he didn't call for it he said he hoped it would happen. Protected by Brandenburg and Yates. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:23 PM |
#162 |
| -
I would call that "advocacy." See the original law. nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 08:43 PM |
#169 |
| -
Even if you call it advocacy, SCOTUS ruled in Yates that such advocacy was specifically permitted. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:45 PM |
#171 |
| -
show us nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 08:56 PM |
#175 |
| -
SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit “advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government" |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:01 PM |
#178 |
| -
nice to see the anti-1st amendment brigade is kickin' |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:16 AM |
#12 |
| -
I am WISHING that one of Jabba the Rush's fans would watch "Talk Radio" |
Cheap_Trick |
Nov-28-09 11:27 PM |
#204 |
| -
I am WISHING that god would "take him home". Maybe the sorry piece of shit will have |
bertman |
Nov-29-09 12:16 AM |
#205 |
| -
Unless it is done against bush* or another republican? |
me b zola |
Nov-28-09 01:15 AM |
#11 |
| -
Who was charged with sedition when bush was in office? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:25 AM |
#24 |
| -
i agree. it's frigging amazing |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:54 AM |
#63 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-09 03:04 AM |
#78 |
| -
if defending the 1st amendment means i hate democratic values |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 03:59 AM |
#79 |
| -
Sure it does. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 11:10 AM |
#90 |
| -
Sorry you are wrong, see Brandenburg v. Ohio. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:13 PM |
#131 |
| -
wrong case law nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:29 PM |
#134 |
| -
In what way does it not apply? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:31 PM |
#136 |
| -
figure that one out on your own nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:33 PM |
#137 |
| -
No need, Brandenburg V. Ohio is clearly the applicable case law. Thanks for your input though. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:40 PM |
#142 |
| -
Yates vs. United States even says Limbaugh is protected. Link included. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:51 PM |
#149 |
| -
you might want to read it more closely nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:55 PM |
#153 |
| -
SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit “advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government" |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:58 PM |
#156 |
| -
I'm not a lawyer and just want the low-down |
caraher |
Nov-28-09 07:57 PM |
#155 |
| -
1st Amendment Law is less relevant here than |
mix |
Nov-28-09 08:13 PM |
#159 |
| -
Yates specifically permits such advocacy. Although hoping something happens isn't advocating much. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:26 PM |
#163 |
| -
Thanks |
caraher |
Nov-28-09 08:31 PM |
#166 |
| -
Time to get this treasonous bastard off the air and in prison. |
Initech |
Nov-28-09 12:50 AM |
#4 |
| -
ah, the anti-1st amendment brigade |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:17 AM |
#14 |
| -
Hey I'm all for exercising 1st amendment rights. |
Initech |
Nov-28-09 01:19 AM |
#17 |
| -
no you aren't at all for exercising 1st amendment rights |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:21 AM |
#19 |
| -
Legal free speech ends when you incite riots like yelling |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:27 AM |
#26 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-09 01:29 AM |
#30 |
| -
Oh you are too much. |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:39 AM |
#41 |
| -
You think someone should go to jail for being anti-American? |
fishwax |
Nov-28-09 01:41 AM |
#44 |
| -
I certainly would go if I tried to get somebody to overthrow the government. |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:45 AM |
#49 |
| -
no, you wouldn't go anywhere except |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:49 AM |
#58 |
| -
Are you his lawyer or something? |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:53 AM |
#62 |
| -
i'm just somebody that believes in civil rights |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:55 AM |
#64 |
| -
How about my civil rights and my free speech? |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 02:09 AM |
#68 |
| -
What name did he call you? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 02:20 AM |
#72 |
| -
that's rubbish |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 02:41 AM |
#75 |
| -
You have civil rights and free speech |
metalbot |
Nov-28-09 06:03 PM |
#115 |
| -
well, that's not exactly equivalent |
fishwax |
Nov-28-09 01:52 AM |
#61 |
| -
it's also not illegal to say what limbaugh said |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 02:46 AM |
#77 |
| -
lol, you sound like a fundamentalist trying to get prayer into school |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:42 AM |
# |
| -
I would certainly be militant if Rush Limbaugh was played to children in |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:46 AM |
#50 |
| -
that wasn't the issue |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:47 AM |
#55 |
| -
To suggest that the military should "detain" the President is |
mix |
Nov-28-09 11:34 AM |
#94 |
| -
Exactly. It's like yelling fire in a crowded auditorium. |
Initech |
Nov-28-09 02:11 AM |
#69 |
| -
wrong both as to the first amendment and to the constitutional definition of treason |
onenote |
Nov-28-09 04:04 PM |
#110 |
| -
Doesn't a riot have to happen before you could possibly be indicted for inciting one? |
cherokeeprogressive |
Nov-28-09 07:36 PM |
#139 |
| -
Baloney |
skepticscott |
Nov-28-09 09:21 PM |
#189 |
| -
What is treason? |
JDPriestly |
Nov-28-09 10:18 PM |
#198 |
| -
You apparently aren't aware of the danger this exhibits. |
Initech |
Nov-28-09 02:16 AM |
#71 |
| -
Are you resorting to a comic book reference? Really? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 02:26 AM |
#74 |
| -
Inciting the rabble who listens to him to commit treason has nothing |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:22 AM |
#21 |
| -
your use of the word incitement |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:25 AM |
#25 |
| -
BS. I know incitement when I hear it. Limbaugh always says something |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:28 AM |
#28 |
| -
you can call it incitement |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:32 AM |
#34 |
| -
I see we have a defender of a traitor here |
fascisthunter |
Nov-28-09 01:10 PM |
#102 |
| -
defending the first amendment hardly makes one an apologist |
onenote |
Nov-28-09 04:08 PM |
#111 |
| -
You need to read your Constitution |
hack89 |
Nov-28-09 06:49 PM |
#123 |
| -
Weigh the options. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 11:23 AM |
#91 |
| -
so when I was marching in the streets against the vietnam war talking about revolution |
onenote |
Nov-28-09 04:18 PM |
#113 |
| -
Read the law. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 06:51 PM |
#124 |
| -
SCOTUS has ruled in both Yates and Brandenburg that you are incorrect. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:53 PM |
#150 |
| -
Still snortin' that Hillbilly Heroin Rushbo? |
Submariner |
Nov-28-09 12:50 AM |
#5 |
| -
He's not on drugs. Never met a fat junkie. |
lysosome |
Nov-28-09 01:41 AM |
#43 |
| -
I think the Fort Hood shooting pretty much nixes that idea n/t |
951-Riverside |
Nov-28-09 12:52 AM |
#6 |
| -
No military coup is a good thing, even if it had been done |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 12:59 AM |
#7 |
| -
another anti 1st amendment brigade post |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:18 AM |
#15 |
| -
The first amendment has nothing to do with suggesting that the military |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:20 AM |
#18 |
| -
brandenberg standard |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:24 AM |
#22 |
| -
You are using the First Amendment to justify overthrowing our government. |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:31 AM |
#31 |
| -
Suggestion. You have just admitted it wasn't incitement. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:32 AM |
#35 |
| -
no, it's not |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:34 AM |
#39 |
| -
You can't even use proper punctuation and you are trying to impress |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:40 AM |
#42 |
| -
trying to impress an authoritarian like you |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:46 AM |
#51 |
| -
Why don't you and your ilk like use punctuation? |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:52 AM |
#60 |
| -
my ilk is too busy opposing |
paulsby |
Nov-28-09 01:57 AM |
#65 |
| -
You have no understanding of the Constitution or federal law. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 03:52 PM |
#109 |
| -
how does the marine oath make what rush said illegal? |
onenote |
Nov-28-09 04:15 PM |
#112 |
| -
It doesn't. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 06:55 PM |
#127 |
| -
Both Limpballs' statements |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 08:12 PM |
#158 |
| -
His "hopes" are clearly protected, see Yates and Brandenburg. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:37 PM |
#168 |
| -
Yep, but |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 09:02 PM |
#179 |
| -
If a West Point grad ever tries to overthrow the Obama admin, Limbaugh may be in trouble. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:04 PM |
#181 |
| -
He didn't publicly call for anything of the sort. That's the problem. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:42 PM |
#143 |
| -
Care to cite case law that supports your drivel? |
Tejas |
Nov-28-09 01:42 AM |
#45 |
| -
Surely you are joking. I would put a bullet to my head if I had to listen |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:57 AM |
#66 |
| -
shouldn't he at the very least be booted off of armed forces radio...? |
dysfunctional press |
Nov-28-09 01:19 AM |
#16 |
| -
THUGS ARE A DISEASE |
HowHasItComeToThis |
Nov-28-09 01:28 AM |
#29 |
| -
Those "THUGS" have protections under the Constitution like everyone else. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:33 AM |
#37 |
| -
False. |
mix |
Nov-28-09 11:43 AM |
#95 |
| -
As has been stated here over and over limbaughs language doesn't meet cross the line. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 05:52 PM |
#114 |
| -
it goes over the line nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 06:52 PM |
#126 |
| -
I advise you call the FBI and Secret Service and tell them your opinion. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:03 PM |
#128 |
| -
The Supreme Court has ruled differently in Brandenburg v. Ohio. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:11 PM |
#130 |
| -
wrong case law nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:17 PM |
#132 |
| -
SCOTUS has ruled in both Yates and Brandenburg that you are incorrect. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:53 PM |
#151 |
| -
prove it nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:56 PM |
#154 |
| -
SCOTUS ruled that the Smith Act did not prohibit “advocacy of forcible overthrow of the government" |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:00 PM |
#157 |
| -
The First Amendment |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 09:45 PM |
#195 |
| -
Advocating the overthrow of the government |
mix |
Nov-28-09 09:55 PM |
#196 |
| -
All you have said is |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 10:13 PM |
#197 |
| -
at least!!!!! nt |
Tumbulu |
Nov-28-09 01:47 AM |
#54 |
| -
He "hopes" Obama will be detained by the military. |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 01:31 AM |
#33 |
| -
Nope. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:34 AM |
#38 |
| -
What's missing? n/t |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 01:44 AM |
#48 |
| -
Do you think it is likely to cause the military to try and stage a coup? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:48 AM |
#56 |
| -
Is it likely to incite it? |
bleever |
Nov-28-09 02:00 AM |
#67 |
| -
Do you think that a military coup is imminent? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 02:15 AM |
#70 |
| -
SARCASM - so when do we haul him to the detention camps? |
bikingaz |
Nov-28-09 01:04 PM |
#101 |
| -
It is, but his apologists say he isn't meeting the Brandenburg standard. |
Cleita |
Nov-28-09 01:43 AM |
#47 |
| -
The law is the law. Your suggestion would be wise, don't pay attention to him. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 01:46 AM |
#53 |
| -
Another instance of Negativity......Rush is Rash...wrong for so long means EVIL |
opihimoimoi |
Nov-28-09 01:42 AM |
#46 |
| -
Fortunately, as much as he yacks, no one actually bothers to... |
TreasonousBastard |
Nov-28-09 01:48 AM |
#57 |
| -
Limbaugh was for Gore in 2000 and Kerry in 2004? |
Fumesucker |
Nov-28-09 06:08 AM |
#83 |
| -
limbaugh has been the most potent political force last 20 yrs |
certainot |
Nov-28-09 01:36 PM |
#106 |
| -
If you support Limpballs |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 08:16 PM |
#160 |
| -
talk radio's why we're in iraq, why the GOP is doomed, why we're not talking single payer |
certainot |
Nov-28-09 08:28 PM |
#165 |
| -
Sorry for the |
billh58 |
Nov-28-09 08:57 PM |
#176 |
| -
exactly |
certainot |
Nov-29-09 02:51 AM |
#210 |
| -
I'm not sure what your |
billh58 |
Nov-29-09 12:47 PM |
#213 |
| -
they have the biggest soapbox and they shout over you every day |
certainot |
Nov-29-09 02:17 PM |
#214 |
| -
Meh... |
billh58 |
Nov-29-09 02:27 PM |
#215 |
| -
i never said a year- get your asses straight |
certainot |
Nov-29-09 04:11 PM |
#217 |
| -
Wow! |
billh58 |
Nov-29-09 04:30 PM |
#218 |
| -
about time! |
certainot |
Nov-29-09 04:35 PM |
#219 |
| -
my point is |
certainot |
Nov-29-09 04:51 PM |
#220 |
| -
He should be removed from public airwaves |
Tumbulu |
Nov-28-09 01:50 AM |
#59 |
| -
It bears mention here that armed forces radio carries Limbaugh. |
burning rain |
Nov-28-09 02:24 AM |
#73 |
| -
+1 |
JVS |
Nov-28-09 04:00 AM |
#80 |
| -
If you believe it to be a problem |
Sherman A1 |
Nov-28-09 02:41 AM |
#76 |
| -
Wow, after reading a lot of these posts I realize that authoritarianism is alive and well on DU. |
proteus_lives |
Nov-28-09 04:28 AM |
#81 |
| -
And by what they get annoyed about shall ye know them. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:40 PM |
#194 |
| -
I think where Rush fucked up, is when he got off of the pain killers |
Hubert Flottz |
Nov-28-09 06:15 AM |
#84 |
| -
Limbaugh should |
Enthusiast |
Nov-28-09 06:27 AM |
#85 |
| -
I'm sure AFRTN didn't put in a disclaimer... |
BlueCollar |
Nov-28-09 06:55 AM |
#86 |
| -
As long as you are willing to put your fat ass in the front line, Rush! |
DailyGrind51 |
Nov-28-09 06:57 AM |
#87 |
| -
No, only leftists are ever prosecuted for sedition; |
StarfarerBill |
Nov-28-09 08:30 AM |
#88 |
| -
Note to Rush: |
FarLeftFist |
Nov-28-09 11:25 AM |
#92 |
| -
He should be taken off Armed Forces Radio at the very least |
Kingofalldems |
Nov-28-09 11:30 AM |
#93 |
| -
YES |
L. Coyote |
Nov-28-09 11:56 AM |
#97 |
| -
He should be kicked off Armed Services Radio at the very LEAST. |
blm |
Nov-28-09 11:46 AM |
#96 |
| -
The Secret Service needs to have a little chat with OxyRush |
Kievan Rus |
Nov-28-09 12:45 PM |
#99 |
| -
nazi boy wants his brand of nazism to take over the country? |
fascisthunter |
Nov-28-09 01:13 PM |
#103 |
| -
When does a political joke become sedition? Oh, I dunno, when they put a noose around your neck... |
bridgit |
Nov-28-09 01:13 PM |
#104 |
| -
Not free speech protected. Calling for a Military coup is a threat on the President. |
berni_mccoy |
Nov-28-09 01:15 PM |
#105 |
| -
'obama's head needs to roll' said limbaugh sept 10, 2008 second hour |
certainot |
Nov-28-09 01:39 PM |
#107 |
| -
yes, Mike Malloy, Amy Goodman, Rachel and KO |
newspeak |
Nov-28-09 02:57 PM |
#108 |
| -
Brandenburg standard's pretty damn vague. |
BreweryYardRat |
Nov-28-09 06:07 PM |
#116 |
| -
Can you imagine what would have happened to any Democrat had they |
Lorien |
Nov-28-09 06:15 PM |
#118 |
| -
Reminds me of a Famous Henry II Quote |
malletgirl02 |
Nov-28-09 06:31 PM |
#120 |
| -
All kinds of people said it and wrote it about Bush. How many of them were imprisoned? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:04 PM |
#129 |
| -
Man--you seem to be a big fan of Rush |
Kingofalldems |
Nov-28-09 07:19 PM |
#133 |
| -
Your reading comprehension sucks. I'll defend the Constitution regardless, you don't have to. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:29 PM |
#135 |
| -
Rush will not be arrested and you know it |
Kingofalldems |
Nov-28-09 07:36 PM |
#140 |
| -
I love our nice big tent. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 07:39 PM |
#141 |
| -
He called for a coup-- publicly |
Kingofalldems |
Nov-28-09 07:43 PM |
#145 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-28-09 07:46 PM |
#147 |
| -
I'll need to see that quote. His speech is protected. I have no idea who decides what's on AFR. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 10:32 PM |
#200 |
| -
No. Not regardless. Only for right wingers. These are the only people you jump out on behalf of. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:01 PM |
#177 |
| -
Who was the last dem that openly hoped for the overthrow of a Repub admin? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:03 PM |
#180 |
| -
Well, since you replied with a non sequitur, it seems I'm not wrong. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:06 PM |
#182 |
| -
The case law here is specific to sedition type cases. Do you understand that? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:09 PM |
#183 |
| -
My point is about something else entirely. But you, of course, know that. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:17 PM |
#186 |
| -
Democrats, even during the Bush years, aren't known for making such inflammatory statements. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:21 PM |
#188 |
| -
No. Instead, they caught worse flak for speaking up in a much less inflammatory fashion. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:27 PM |
#191 |
| -
Nice strawman though. Especially trying to limit the Constitution to the 1st Amendment. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:11 PM |
#184 |
| -
OK, now I laughed. Involuntary comedy at its best! -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:15 PM |
#185 |
| -
You weren't drinking milk were you? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 09:18 PM |
#187 |
| -
Of course not. I was eating roasted blond Christian baby, like all evil Rush-censoring leftists. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-28-09 09:23 PM |
#190 |
| -
Burning Bush Guy? |
Caretha |
Nov-29-09 11:27 AM |
#212 |
| -
See this full-page ad |
billh58 |
Nov-29-09 12:33 AM |
#207 |
| -
This is just like when he incited rabid RWers to kill that census taker in KY |
JonQ |
Nov-28-09 06:26 PM |
#119 |
| -
Is he still being broadcast over Armed Forces Radio, in violation of the Hatch Act? |
havocmom |
Nov-28-09 06:32 PM |
#121 |
| -
Nothing new |
alp227 |
Nov-28-09 06:41 PM |
#122 |
| -
This is scary shit! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-28-09 06:51 PM |
#125 |
| -
Air Force Radio should stop carrying him completely |
martymar64 |
Nov-28-09 07:42 PM |
#144 |
| -
Instead of looking for sedition case |
Angry Dragon |
Nov-28-09 08:27 PM |
#164 |
| -
Limbaugh made no such threat. His speech is Constitutionally protected. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-28-09 08:44 PM |
#170 |
| -
Actually, it is not |
Politicub |
Nov-29-09 12:27 AM |
#206 |
| -
How does his opinion become unprotected by the fact it is being broadcast? |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-29-09 01:41 AM |
#209 |
| -
It may (MAY) be, but his "right" to be on AFR is most assuredly NOT. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Nov-29-09 07:45 AM |
#211 |
| -
There is no Constitutional protection in regards to AFR. |
Fire_Medic_Dave |
Nov-29-09 03:51 PM |
#216 |
| -
self delete nt |
mix |
Nov-28-09 07:54 PM |
#152 |
| -
NOW do you think they will take him off the list of programs heard |
jwirr |
Nov-28-09 08:36 PM |
#167 |
| -
Sounds like OxyRush wants civil war. |
roamer65 |
Nov-28-09 08:45 PM |
#172 |
| -
Gee, if rush is whining, why can't he do the fuckin' work of doing to coup himself? |
Deja Q |
Nov-28-09 08:46 PM |
#173 |
| -
Did the military radio station broadcast this stuff to our troops? |
JDPriestly |
Nov-28-09 08:52 PM |
#174 |
| -
May the fat f u c k e r rest in PIECES!!!! |
pitchforksandtorches |
Nov-28-09 09:30 PM |
#192 |
| -
He should be marked as a terrorist/insurgent and put on the Terror Watch List/NO-Fly List |
agentS |
Nov-28-09 10:30 PM |
#199 |
| -
That's it. Off with his head! |
RedCloud |
Nov-28-09 10:34 PM |
#201 |
| -
kick and recommend!!! This needs to go viral!!!! |
Douglas Carpenter |
Nov-28-09 10:47 PM |
#202 |
| -
Several people have said similar things |
The Wizard |
Nov-28-09 10:57 PM |
#203 |
| -
Lets start a coup |
Laura902 |
Nov-30-09 02:59 PM |
#221 |
| -
I call it treason .... |
gleaner |
Nov-30-09 03:15 PM |
#222 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore